the lao chiao can hao lian.....cum MCF sibei stress.................want haolian also must pretend pretend................if not sure kena left right centre up down...............
![[laugh]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tYSWuvbpy4BOdpHe5wHyEcEUnhG3Wy26beRORIFSdNNdJF9OlZ9iU6EuzDTe9EtJbvDd-HuF_lRMpLtpi4p9IXtQoJ91DNBwDdws7sBgd_YZfD4SU2uZicF5zIpstQBRWPkvJbAA=s0-d)
Constructive is for the benefits of all drivers here :))
ehhh..if u can understand, it is impression i m talking about. Looks like u choose to absorb whats not. I dun blame u anyway.
�
The person didnt seem to get so angry but u did instead. Any relation in-between?
�
U mean u get anry when ppl ask u generally abt ur loved ones? Ehhh...I think I didnt get ur parents into discussion u must hv read wrongly. Looks like u can get sour over the mere mention of "parents"? Need help to get over that allergy? F...word has a meaning...u didnt use it correctly thou.
�
Cheers...
�
you have chosen not to answer my questions...........so be it...........not surprise anyway..........
�
I dont have to tell you if there is any relation anywhere...............or do I???............
�
so many ppl hamtam him................do you see me upset with everyone???................I am always objective............
�
Let me remind you to not get parents into any discussion.............
bro.....you have been a member for 10 yrs.....chill. Sometime we get misquoted othertimes people read and their opinion differs from others.....no need to go on and on. Its just a forum....ehhh..if u can understand, it is impression i m talking about. Looks like u choose to absorb whats not. I dun blame u anyway.
The person didnt seem to get so angry but u did instead. Any relation in-between?
U mean u get anry when ppl ask u generally abt ur loved ones? Ehhh...I think I didnt get ur parents into discussion u must hv read wrongly. Looks like u can get sour over the mere mention of "parents"? Need help to get over that allergy? F...word has a meaning...u didnt use it correctly thou.
Cheers...
Some times we just deserve it...bro.....you have been a member for 10 yrs.....chill. Sometime we get misquoted othertimes people read and their opinion differs from others.....no need to go on and on. Its just a forum....
Look at me
This time, maybe grandmother's C- class and grandfather's A4.
http://www.channelne...al/2953536.html
I think I hv answered ur qns within my capacity..again if u understand, I m not asking for an answer fr u if u understand. Thank you for being objective and maybe that qualify to be in haolian thread?
�
Thank you for the reminder but dun think you can do anything..again thank you for being more than a mod, than a mod.
�
Cheers..
�
i have spent the last 10mins reading tru your exchange with tianmo...�
�
i just find it immensely funny that you criticize other people for lack of decorum and etiquette on your first post on this topic�
�
and proceed to stir tianmo when he pointed out you should not bring in someone's parent into a discussion... just becoz you claim to have no intention does not mean it is not..�
�
your following thinly-veiled inference about tianmo is trying to illicit a response from him and you duely got it.. �
�
i have not disliked someone's comment for a LOONG time.. �get off your pedestal
�
�
Edited by SuPerBoRed, 14 July 2016 - 02:58 PM.
I don't know WTF is so special about Seletar Link. Used to frequent there for work.
�
�
Another 2 charged for racing at seletar link.
This time, maybe grandmother's C- class and grandfather's A4.
http://www.channelne...al/2953536.html
�
I don't know WTF is so special about Seletar Link. Used to frequent there for work.
Long straight road with no traffic at night perhaps?
Then the stretch beside Tengah is better leh...Long straight road with no traffic at night perhaps?
Another 2 charged for racing at seletar link.
This time, maybe grandmother's C- class and grandfather's A4.
http://www.channelne...al/2953536.html
�
power booked last year sia ... now den tio.�
�
but the merc looks not bad le. haha
i have spent the last 10mins reading tru your exchange with tianmo...�
�
i just find it immensely funny that you criticize other people for lack of decorum and etiquette on your first post on this topic�
�
and proceed to stir tianmo when he pointed out you should not bring in someone's parent into a discussion... just becoz you claim to have no intention does not mean it is not..�
�
your following thinly-veiled inference about tianmo is trying to illicit a response from him and you duely got it.. �
�
i have not disliked someone's comment for a LOONG time.. �get off your pedestal
Everybody has the right to like or dislike..it is one's call.
�
I m getting back only the person who commented ppl should hv done this or that, as I felt this is an unfair statement like the rest. Hence felt HE should be treated with his own medicine. IT is not to anger anyone else other than the person.�
�
I replied mainly to explain my stand..sorry for making anyone to read the exchanges.�
Edited by Unfazed, 14 July 2016 - 03:15 PM.
Might be confiscated...... confiscated means what? TP can slap on TP logo and use it to patrol the streets huh?
�
Another 2 charged for racing at seletar link.
This time, maybe grandmother's C- class and grandfather's A4.
http://www.channelne...al/2953536.html
�
It's long, but not as long as LCK i think?
�
As for traffic at night, yes hardly any traffic there after the mixer trucks and tipper trucks finish work for the night.
�
Personally I have seen street racers there. But I left them alone since they didn't disturb my humble kimchi car
�
Long straight road with no traffic at night perhaps?
�
Looks like a riced up Merc.
�
And most probably not a C63 AMG.
�
�
power booked last year sia ... now den tio.�
�
but the merc looks not bad le. haha
�
Either crushed or auctioned off.
�
Not sure if they would transfer the cars to other departments for use though. Like CID or CNB.
�
Might be confiscated...... confiscated means what? TP can slap on TP logo and use it to patrol the streets huh?
�
Looks like a riced up Merc.
�
And most probably not a C63 AMG.
�
yup looks that way. not an ugly bonnet though.�
Another kid runs in front of car, no drama, would have been worse if going faster:
�
lelong lor....Might be confiscated...... confiscated means what? TP can slap on TP logo and use it to patrol the streets huh?
This one more appropriate:
Welli apt. I thought I was the only one who saw this.
Where is jman photo...you have the super virus bro.....but on second thought....maybe you are the super virus...���
I read your first sentence...............and jumping with joy..............i want i want to dislike...............but I read the 3rd paragraph...........and tell myself..............KNN if I dislike this............I will have to praise you on the next post.............KNN better save my 10 points for others................
�
OK...............I agree 50%.................and I disagree 50%..............f**k you lah...............next time let me agree or disagree 100% can or not................�
�
Finally 65%. Not bad. Betterer than white team in 2011 but worserer than white team in 2015.
�
You really got the post you deserve, I don't want to hear any more complaining (or disliking)!!!.......................................
.............................................................................................................................
Ur car? What happen? U horn him he not happy?
Chey...
What is ICU?
�
I think u meant IU.�
� IU is meant In-vehicle Unit.
https://www.onemotor...earch.html?q=IU
�
�
�
The only ICU I know is Intensive Care Unit.
�
"In Cab Unit"?
you know why? The TP likes to go for these:
�
�
�
I'm likely in the minority on this, and I'm probably gonna get flamed and possibly "disliked" - that's OK - just remember to leave your name and not be an anonymous coward about it, I won't bite back.
�
But I don't agree with this relentless persecution of street racing. Yes, it's illegal. But if they're doing it away from other earthly traffic at ungodly hours on a deserted road, who, other than themselves (and possibly willing participants/spectators) are they really putting at risk?�
�
The TP are diverting resources to catching people at ungodly hours like these in addition to putting people on bridges (and yes, they do this to catch non-racing speeders on empty roads in the wee hours too). Meanwhile, road hazards during rush hour are allowed to continue - dangerously overloaded trucks, weaving and lane-splitting bikes, irresponsible pedestrians, cyclists and e-cyclists. I know it's fallacious to attribute the lack of enforcement of some important things to the enforcement of other things, but it does seem like they're "squeezing the balloon" of limited resources, or maybe even going for the low-hanging fruit. Revenue-generation, example-making, and all that.
�
Street racing should remain illegal. But catch the really egregious garang ones like those guys at Orchard Gudang mixing it up with "innocent traffic". Don't gun for these guys who are keeping it to the ulu places late at night and who don't put the innocent at risk. If and when you build a track in Singapore, I'll say you can go all out and catch people, but until then, a little restraint can be shown.
�
OK, flame away.
�
you know why? The TP likes to go for these:
�
�
�
�
Can't praise you, but so true!
Fever easy to treat..... psychological problems harder to treat... just saying
cfm is no take fever medicine..........
�
Fever easy to treat..... psychological problems harder to treat... just saying
He confuse ppl until they ask to go buangkok hotel
That's why he ally
Looks like Jurong? Must be all that chemical rain and air.
�
yup, its near IMM loading bay entrance/exit.
wasted! never take parang
drive until like that, must as well box the shit out of each other
There is a chinese saying.... use poison to counteract another poison...
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Just have to be extra careful when using poison.... this is the minimum spec to handle Joseph22
�
�
We al know Joseph22 legacy
He confuse ppl until they ask to go buangkok hotel
That's why he ally�
�
Edited by Vratenza, 15 July 2016 - 09:29 AM.
Yeah, sibhay anticlimax dio bo?
�
I was almost going to take out my popcorn liao...�
�
�
wasted! never take parang
drive until like that, must as well box the shit out of each other�
��
�
Edited by Vratenza, 15 July 2016 - 09:30 AM.
I think LTA needs to replace Give Way lines with double humps and Stop Line with 5" high hump.
I also kena near IMM area along Boon Lay Way last week, BMW decided to rush out from filter lane even though I was about 5M away from him, true enough, the BMW scraped into my left rear side. His argument was that I should have stopped my car for him to exit and he didn't see any Give Way line.
dunno to cry or laugh...
No sound in the VCR, but my guess is the taxi must have horn at the VW when the VW filtered out into the main road. The road ahead of the VW �(lane 3) was cleared, why did he jammed his brake twice? I suppose he bay song tio horn, so did it on purpose. Anyway, the taxi waited for the VW to clear so far ahead before moving off, I think that was good enough, he didn't gave chase. But as he filtered right and most likely wanting to turn right into toh guan east road, see what the VW did, he purposely cut ahead dangerously to block the Taxi.
�
A case of young, high ego new driver is my thought. And maybe he still has the mind set that you hit my back and I am protected. Interesting to see what is the outcome. I think this "you hit my back and you are wrong" concept has to change...
�
The taxi never wait lah. Can see that the taxi driver got out from the taxi when the car stopped. Assume to confront the polo but it ran away instead. Noticed the jerk in the recording, its caused by closing of the car door. Those in car cameras using suction cups type of holder will experience such jerking motion more than those that uses double sided tape.
At least the taxi driver never swerve to the other lane like my incident. He braked and stopped in his own lane.
I think LTA needs to replace Give Way lines with double humps and Stop Line with 5" high hump.
I also kena near IMM area along Boon Lay Way last week, BMW decided to rush out from filter lane even though I was about 5M away from him, true enough, the BMW scraped into my left rear side. His argument was that I should have stopped my car for him to exit and he didn't see any Give Way line.
dunno to cry or laugh...
i wish these type of drivers get run over and die
�
I wonder is there a TP rule on, "intention to cause an accident", and what would be the charges be...LOL
The taxi never wait lah. Can see that the taxi driver got out from the taxi when the car stopped. Assume to confront the polo but it ran away instead. Noticed the jerk in the recording, its caused by closing of the car door. Those in car cameras using suction cups type of holder will experience such jerking motion more than those that uses double sided tape.
At least the taxi driver never swerve to the other lane like my incident. He braked and stopped in his own lane.
�
I think you are right on the taxi driver alight part...LOL
�
But seriously, I am no saint, I think I would have alight also if I were the taxi driver...LOL
�
My point is, without the recording, taxi confirm is up lorry. Road condition dry, traffic moderate, traffic light red (i think), VW has come to stop already, and taxi bang direct from behind. But case in point is, there was an intention to cause an accident by the VW driver.
i think you call him a jerk is being polite already... �
�
from so far away can see the VW already fully in his lane.. he still go smack the butt..�
�
and still have the god damn cheek to post this video thinking that he can be justified to cause and accident... �
�
VW is a cb kia.. watever reason.. but cab driver is much worse imo�
I chose to differ....think the cab is a bad tempered driver(like most of us, maybe not u but me definitely, wifey complained that I become an angry man behind wheels
�). He most likely horned to show his 'displeasure' and I think he is driving quite fast as well. But u can c that he waited for a good distance b4 continuing his drive off and he went to the first lane. Meaning he wants to get on with his business and journey. The VW chap jus wanna play punk and cut his lane and jam break. This resulted in the accident. IMO u can horn, u can wind down ur window and scold, whatever but y wanna create accident. Cars in SG beri exp u know...buay xim tia meh? So conclusion the VW the bigger of the 2 jerks!
The taxi never wait lah. Can see that the taxi driver got out from the taxi when the car stopped. Assume to confront the polo but it ran away instead. Noticed the jerk in the recording, its caused by closing of the car door.�
�
�
Very good observation .�
�I didnt notice that.
�
Means the VW actually a pussy ; want to play brake check , but when other driver confront , he bo jie , run away .�
Just make insurance coverage like in Canada.
�
Any accident, ownself claim ownself.
I think LTA needs to replace Give Way lines with double humps and Stop Line with 5" high hump.
I also kena near IMM area along Boon Lay Way last week, BMW decided to rush out from filter lane even though I was about 5M away from him, true enough, the BMW scraped into my left rear side. His argument was that I should have stopped my car for him to exit and he didn't see any Give Way line.
dunno to cry or laugh...
For this type of accident, the insurance company for the cab will contest in court for a lower liability. Both lawyers will fight it out. I suspect the liability will be 50/50, reason being the VW has stopped repeatedly in a rash manner with the intention to cause accident. I won't be surprised if VW driver suffers higher liability to be honest if the judge reviews the whole recording.
�
As a very objective third-party who just viewed the recording 5 min ago, I hope the VW gets higher liability.
For this type of accident, the insurance company for the cab will contest in court for a lower liability. Both lawyers will fight it out. I suspect the liability will be 50/50, reason being the VW has stopped repeatedly in a rash manner with the intention to cause accident. I won't be surprised if VW driver suffers higher liability to be honest if the judge reviews the whole recording.
�
As a very objective third-party who just viewed the recording 5 min ago, I hope the VW gets higher liability.
�
�
totally agree! �Bloody VW driver shd be like that ahpui, licence gantong....nb
totally agree! �Bloody VW driver shd be like that ahpui, licence gantong....nb
�
I hope the VW driver suffers something else. Oops, I need to go confession tomorrow liao. Your fault lah
I think LTA needs to replace Give Way lines with double humps and Stop Line with 5" high hump.
�
I also kena near IMM area along Boon Lay Way last week, BMW decided to rush out from filter lane even though I was about 5M away from him, true enough, the BMW scraped into my left rear side. His argument was that I should have stopped my car for him to exit and he didn't see any Give Way line.
�
dunno to cry or laugh...�
�
GVGT .... I just installed a video cam for my car for obvious reason.
�
I was waiting at the slip road along Ulu Pandan Road into Clementi, a tipper truck tried to squeeze through and side wipe my car. I bo tai bo chi kena and insurance said 50/50 as the driver may claim that I cut into his lane and he cannot siam me. WTF.
�
Made claim, paid the excess and now waiting for the outcome.
�
�
I hope the VW driver suffers something else. Oops, I need to go confession tomorrow liao. Your fault lah
�
hahah..you cum tonight than i absolve you
�
Vratenza bring his 7 flower water and dunno what water he has....
�
This action also experience more jerking motion than those who do not....
�
The taxi never wait lah. Can see that the taxi driver got out from the taxi when the car stopped. Assume to confront the polo but it ran away instead. Noticed the jerk in the recording, its caused by closing of the car door. Those in car cameras using suction cups type of holder will experience such jerking motion more than those that uses double sided tape.
At least the taxi driver never swerve to the other lane like my incident. He braked and stopped in his own lane.
�
�
Edited by Vratenza, 15 July 2016 - 12:52 PM.
i go east coast park lagoon hawker centre buy coconut water from my favourite coconut supplier
�
�
works better than the 7 flower water.... machiam 7-flower water turbocharged!
hahah..you cum tonight than i absolve you
�
Vratenza bring his 7 flower water and dunno what water he has....�
��
�
Edited by Vratenza, 15 July 2016 - 12:53 PM.
Fever easy to treat..... psychological problems harder to treat... just saying
�
that's the issue..............his is psychological fever............he always need ppl to remind him take medicine.............then he feel song...........after that he will become normal liao.............
�
can tell us the insurance outcome or fella prefer private settlement.
�
70+ year old man... refused to exchange particulars and had no intention to give me his contact number and name until I 'strongly encouraged' him to do so. anyway, workshop says $250 for paint work, I decided to let it go since left less than 12 months to this car's life. I reported to my insurance and specifically said no claims unless kena b**tard.
I hope you were driving your elephant!
�
no lah... the scoob is my B&B.
if elephant most like rim scratched and the BMW will most likely get more than a dented in front bumper.
GVGT .... I just installed a video cam for my car for obvious reason.
�
I was waiting at the slip road along Ulu Pandan Road into Clementi, a tipper truck tried to squeeze through and side wipe my car. I bo tai bo chi kena and insurance said 50/50 as the driver may claim that I cut into his lane and he cannot siam me. WTF.
�
Made claim, paid the excess and now waiting for the outcome.
�
damn suay bro... �but if you were waiting your car should be stationary... did you explicitly indicate that in your accident report?
�
anyway I've always decided against video cam because most of the videos I've watched are self pawn and I always believe that if one practice defensive driving, 90% of the time you are safe. that day I very defensive liao as I anticipated the BMW would rush out so I just maintain speed and lift my foot off accelerator.
�
Just that this old uncle timing really bad, I past him already he still ngeh ngeh want to come scrape my bumper.
�
Hope your insurance got do the necessary leg work.
70+ year old man... refused to exchange particulars and had no intention to give me his contact number and name until I 'strongly encouraged' him to do so. anyway, workshop says $250 for paint work, I decided to let it go since left less than 12 months to this car's life. I reported to my insurance and specifically said no claims unless kena b**tard.
no lah... the scoob is my B&B.
if elephant most like rim scratched and the BMW will most likely get more than a dented in front bumper.
Old farts think they big fark.
�
I encountered so many, you never encounter before meh?
�
�
wah....70+ still act garang....what is happening to SG?
�
jam brake and jam brake...haiz�
�
polo finally met someone that taught him to realise the outcome of suck needless act.�
70+ year old man... refused to exchange particulars and had no intention to give me his contact number and name until I 'strongly encouraged' him to do so. anyway, workshop says $250 for paint work, I decided to let it go since left less than 12 months to this car's life. I reported to my insurance and specifically said no claims unless kena b**tard.
�
no lah... the scoob is my B&B.
if elephant most like rim scratched and the BMW will most likely get more than a dented in front bumper.
�
This is the real reason for not installing camera.
�
jam brake and jam brake...haiz
polo finally met someone that taught him to realise the outcome of suck needless act.
totally agree! Bloody VW driver shd be like that ahpui, licence gantong....nb
Kill peepur , 6 months jail nia
http://www.straitsti...ausing-death-of�
�
�
Slash peepur get 9 months
http://www.straitsti...-1-year-ban-for�
Edited by Mockngbrd, 15 July 2016 - 05:05 PM.
me second you.
I'm likely in the minority on this, and I'm probably gonna get flamed and possibly "disliked" - that's OK - just remember to leave your name and not be an anonymous coward about it, I won't bite back.
�
But I don't agree with this relentless persecution of street racing. Yes, it's illegal. But if they're doing it away from other earthly traffic at ungodly hours on a deserted road, who, other than themselves (and possibly willing participants/spectators) are they really putting at risk?�
�
The TP are diverting resources to catching people at ungodly hours like these in addition to putting people on bridges (and yes, they do this to catch non-racing speeders on empty roads in the wee hours too). Meanwhile, road hazards during rush hour are allowed to continue - dangerously overloaded trucks, weaving and lane-splitting bikes, irresponsible pedestrians, cyclists and e-cyclists. I know it's fallacious to attribute the lack of enforcement of some important things to the enforcement of other things, but it does seem like they're "squeezing the balloon" of limited resources, or maybe even going for the low-hanging fruit. Revenue-generation, example-making, and all that.
�
Street racing should remain illegal. But catch the really egregious garang ones like those guys at Orchard Gudang mixing it up with "innocent traffic". Don't gun for these guys who are keeping it to the ulu places late at night and who don't put the innocent at risk. If and when you build a track in Singapore, I'll say you can go all out and catch people, but until then, a little restraint can be shown.
�
OK, flame away.
Somehow, I agree with your comments, there are simply too many reckless motorists on the road nowadays and basically, practice defensive driving is the SOP for those sharing the roads with them! You will never know when you will encounter them even you drive safe!
��
1. Parents of such racers will kpkb why never intervene or conduct checks or prevent blah blah blah.....
2. These racers are likely to bring the fun to the next level... Street racings for more kicks and funner
3. Introduce more opportunities for gang related activities ie gambling and drinking and fights when poor losers are born. Then more trouble with having to look for killer(s) or missing face or limbs.
4. Encourage more illegal mods until Transformers also no chance
The kids of today are pretty useless... Because of useless parents of this generation. They leave the upbringing stuff to maids and everything that can go wrong goes wrong, they blame others and then migrate (thank God).jam brake and jam brake...haiz�
�
polo finally met someone that taught him to realise the outcome of suck needless act.�
�
He might not learn if the insurance company decides to fault the taxi driver instead. Got to hope that he can't claim against the taxi driver and still get charged by TP.
Turboflat4, the problem is allowing such illegal racing at quiet, secluded places have the following issues, real, imagined or waiting to happen or still in movie scripts or in movies :
1. Parents of such racers will kpkb why never intervene or conduct checks or prevent blah blah blah.....
2. These racers are likely to bring the fun to the next level... Street racings for more kicks and funner
3. Introduce more opportunities for gang related activities ie gambling and drinking and fights when poor losers are born. Then more trouble with having to look for killer(s) or missing face or limbs.
4. Encourage more illegal mods until Transformers also no chance
The kids of today are pretty useless... Because of useless parents of this generation. They leave the upbringing stuff to maids and everything that can go wrong goes wrong, they blame others and then migrate (thank God). �
I take a humorous view and will be a flame b4 you... � the pressure is mine.
Seriously, it is not something I personally am for. If they have more sense and burning desire to race please go to a safer place like racetracks. At the end of the day, why is a simple and easy way to do so not used?
Thanks for sharing your views. It's always refreshing and usually out of the law... I mean the norm type. You lead a fulfilling life... Kudos to that.
Safe ride
Cheers
With regard to racetracks, why do we still not have a single one, not even a dragstrip, but we have too damn many golf courses? I know the old fogeys in white love to waste their lives away on the green, but some of us prefer to waste our lives on the Green Hell. Or at least a local equivalent, watered down as it may be. I think there's definitely demand. As I said, once it's built, there will br absolutely no more excuse for any sort of public street racing or speed trials. There is room, by the way. CEC is frequently used for car events, they can just make it a dedicated setup. And there are even better options in the really ulu places.
(Don't talk about Malaysia, that's another country, we need one *here*).
Driver jin saki, kanna hit big time lao, both still can continue driving like nothing happened. Haha..
Parental Guidance or Pasir Gudang..
KNS
Why will someone change lane like that???
think he was trying to swerve to the next lane so he could avoid rear-ending the car in front of him.
�
but he ended up hitting a motorcyclist
think he was trying to swerve to the next lane so he could avoid rear-ending the car in front of him.
but he ended up hitting a motorcyclist
Edited by Joseph22, 16 July 2016 - 11:09 PM.
KNS�
�
Jialat
![[shakehead]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_u6Ej8hp6xpiGorkGBkBGO7aFMAUzhPHzbOjfUfkJA9yI8RIpCxWaGZtsc_yrUO7-H5nUhrU03LOmdAeJLf9dqpwE98gaM_P3wXeTqr0Gsx-NhvxOk9gSjeAVJPl7AwlLbhcF-iKpMELmA=s0-d)
Why will someone change lane like that???
Last minute lane change without checking blind spot.
KNS�
�
Stupid tailgater. End up causing others to get injured.�
Huh .... really can't see the plates clearly. Maybe heat from the tarmac or camera not suitable for such weather. Care to share which camera so that ppl can avoid getting it. LOL, just joking.
�
Lol. Just avoid those no brand ones. Mine is a free gift. No brand. Box only write HD car dvr.
KNS
Such sudden change! See ghost infront, is it?
Hope the motorcyclist is ok... Got to claim from this driver !
�
tats an S2000 right?
Taxi again..... I really do hope it is because of their significantly higher road presence rather than inherent problem with taxi driver skills and mentality.
�
I am quite lucky as just about 50m behind the taxi when accident happen !
�
i suspect the heat distort the distance between the lens vs the CCD sensors. Thereby altering the focus point on the CCD causing the phenomenon.
�
Huh .... really can't see the plates clearly. Maybe heat from the tarmac or camera not suitable for such weather. Care to share which camera so that ppl can avoid getting it. LOL, just joking.
�
Hope you can help yourself here in MCF....
�
Dio Boh RadX ?
�
�
Hi, guys!!!
I'm back on this Service again!!!
Those got black listed by bank having problem like,Getting car finance loan, bankruptcy personnel, needs helps on renewing vehicle COE or more...!! No more headaches because I'm back to solve all those problem U all have ya.
Call 8169-nine2nine2 for more info kindly drop a sms if my ph having lo batt sign apologize. Even Dealer U R always Welcome please thank you!�
Attached Thumbnails
Hope you can help yourself here in MCF....
Dio Boh RadX ?
�
dangerous driving... blood going to wrong head cannot think properly
Either passenger is dehydrated or she needs nourishment badly...
�
�
�
dangerous driving... blood going to wrong head cannot think properly
�
chiong some more lah�
�
Civic ESI - V TEC dam powerful
Either passenger is dehydrated or she needs nourishment badly...
Amazing... Is he the record holder to have receive 85 dislike points in one post?.. �
Screenshot_20160718-225653.png
�
dangerous driving... blood going to wrong head cannot think properly
�
If this is in Singapore, then we now know why there are hoggers on Lane 1 and why Lane 2 are always filled with trucks and other big vehicles!�
In that split second, he had to decide to move left or right. I guess he was hoping that the taxi driver stopped his car then the civic will zoomed past on the left.
The taxi should not just chiong out followed the car in front of him. He never checked properly before turning...
Actually I do feel taxi at fault.
Don't think he hogging lah, that stretch is the part where traffic from Telok Blangah Road all try to join the upramp to Keppel Viaduct from the extreme left of the 4 lane section. As the section is relatively short, a lot of them takes on more risky lane filtering manoeuvre �in order to make it to the right most lane in time.
�
From the video all those who seem to be "overtaking" are in fact from the left most lane from Telok Blangah Road
�
Hahaha...Bro Karlzeiss...what car you driving ? How come every car want to overtake you?�
�
Actually, if the civic just keep to his lane instead of swerving left, he would have made it even at that high speed also. I guess he panicked and didn't know what to do. Swerve left already then realise cannot make it so jam brake but the wheels locked up and couldn't swerve back to the right lane.
�
My guess (guess only hor) is the Civic was traveling at high speed on the right lane. Then the Estima was cruising at 55km/h also on the right lane which made the Civic filtered from the right to left. The Civic wanted to move back to the right lane but the Taxi came out. So at that point, he decided to move back to the left hoping that the Taxi would stopped. Guess that was why the Civic didnt brake until it was too late.�
�
As for the taxi, based on assumption again, he didnt really see the Civic because it could have been blocked by the Estima and until it was too late. Based on the two car cam video, it sure looked like a gloomy day. So gloomy day, f&f black colored car, the taxi turning busy looking out for the car turning in front of him and wanting to rush across.... accident
�
Another thing I noticed was the second cam car. It was moving off from the bus bay and made the Civic moved to the right lane to avoid it just in case it came out the bay without checking.
�
On hindsight, the Civic should have just brake the moment he saw the taxi. He could have stopped in time... �
�
(p.s. There was a mandatory give way to bus exiting from the bay - probably that was also one of the reason he was drifting from left to right)
30%/70%, civic take most of the blame?
�
Not sure. For me, I will give 50/50 or most blame to the Taxi for failure to look out for cars. But I will fine the Civic jialat jialat for excessive speed...
Mod engine.. mod suspension...mod exhaust....... end up did not mod the brakes and most importantly forgot to mod his driving skills.
chiong some more lah�
�
Sometime drive Too Long on the road will be a bit numb and body take over... Think this is what happen...
Actually I do feel taxi at fault.�
Of course, on hindsight, we can say anything. At the point in time, I probably will also try to accelerate when i see a car coming straight at me.�
Road hog spotted.
�
�
not road hog lah, there is only one lane going up the keppel�viaduct, all vehicle have to start filter in early cos you never know how soon the jam going to start queuing up.
There are 2 lanes to access Keppel up-ramp from day 1 leh.
�
Don't think he hogging lah, that stretch is the part where traffic from Telok Blangah Road all try to join the upramp to Keppel Viaduct from the extreme left of the 4 lane section. As the section is relatively short, a lot of them takes on more risky lane filtering manoeuvre �in order to make it to the right most lane in time.
�
From the video all those who seem to be "overtaking" are in fact from the left most lane from Telok Blangah Road
�
Nope. There are 2 lanes now.
�
not road hog lah, there is only one lane going up the keppel�viaduct, all vehicle have to start filter in early cos you never know how soon the jam going to start queuing up.
�
There are 2 lanes to access Keppel up-ramp from day 1 leh.
�
�
Nope. There are 2 lanes now.
�
�
i see now, but i remember it used to be one lane long ago, i hardly use this road but i know the jam can start even before it come down from the viaduct above harbourfront.
i see now, but i remember it used to be one lane long ago, i hardly use this road but i know the jam can start even before it come down from the viaduct above harbourfront.
�
i also remember used to be 1 lane and everyone kiasu. dont travel from that area much now, but good to know got 2 lanes liao
Its not VW polo lah, is golf.
Today Straits Times also report as Polo.
Cut and paste journalism. Haha ...
Road hog spotted.
�
I wouldn't call it roadhog lah bro... I'd say very cautious driver and judging by the way the cars filtering right are macam in a rush, there's cause to behave this way. But if all traffic going straight (e.g. expressway) then maybe slight hog. Piglet maybe.
Why will someone change lane like that???
Change lane like trying to take out the motorcyclist. Kokanathan!
Today Straits Times also report as Polo.
Cut and paste journalism. Haha ...�
MCF information credible mah.
�
dangerous driving... blood going to wrong head cannot think properly
�
�
Song song gao Jurong
�dangerous driving... blood going to wrong head cannot think properly
�
Duckduck, I think it is not what it seems to be.
�
Because the guy did not place�1 hand on the girl's head or tidying her hair. Natural reaction no?
literally................"shear driving pleasure"
He better not jam brake.
Duckduck, I think it is not what it seems to be.
Because the guy did not place 1 hand on the girl's head or tidying her hair. Natural reaction no?
In the first place ... Confirm its girl meh ?i see now, but i remember it used to be one lane long ago, i hardly use this road but i know the jam can start even before it come down from the viaduct above harbourfront.
�
It was 1 lane all the while...............only until as recent as last year I think...........then it was wider to 2 lane...............after they added an extra lane to the road............
TP must award the front passenger for still using her seat belt while cumming under strenuous circumstances.....
�
�
�
dangerous driving... blood going to wrong head cannot think properly
�
It was 1 lane all the while...............only until as recent as last year I think...........then it was wider to 2 lane...............after they added an extra lane to the road............
�
�
that explain why everyone rushing to filter into lane 1, cos all still thinking only 1 lane only �
that explain why everyone rushing to filter into lane 1, cos all still thinking only 1 lane only �
�
this area is always very messy one lor..............
�
I wouldn't call it roadhog lah bro... I'd say very cautious driver and judging by the way the cars filtering right are macam in a rush, there's cause to behave this way. But if all traffic going straight (e.g. expressway) then maybe slight hog. Piglet maybe.
Actually, if he stay in the right lane, he wouldn't have hit the taxi even if he never slow down. Can taxi driver argue the driver purposely aim his taxi? Lol.
�
Btw, The black car is a Honda? I thought should have ABS. Or he never maintain his car properly and ABS fail?
�
Taxi so badly damaged. The black car must have been going really fast.
�
Looks like a brake bias or wheel alignment issue.
failing to keep up with traffic flow = road hog in a way.
Song song gao Jurong
�
�
awwww �yeah
Bro Karlzeiss should consider the second lane because many cars will try to go straight to the first lane.
Bro thanks for the feedback.
�
With hindsight I should have stick to lane 2 since I was trying to be very caution during rush hour on this stretch of road. That is also the reason I shared this video hoping to create some awareness on the road condition in this area -especially this is not the first time i encountered such situation on this road except that this was the closest to being an accident.
Maybe this one......
SpoilerI thought I see bra lines leh.. anyway could still be a trans or guy
�
�
�
As for the taxi, based on assumption again, he didnt really see the Civic because it could have been blocked by the Estima and until it was too late.�
er no, that's just how taxis drive every other day.�
Actually, if he stay in the right lane, he wouldn't have hit the taxi even if he never slow down. Can taxi driver argue the driver purposely aim his taxi? Lol.
�
Btw, The black car is a Honda? I thought should have ABS. Or he never maintain his car properly and ABS fail?
�
Taxi so badly damaged. The black car must have been going really fast.
badly damaged meh? looks ok what.�
Er ........ more like honda man 100% leh ........
�
Speeding, Dangerous Driving, Reckless Driving and the USUAL .......NEVER SLOW DOWN/STOP when coming to a junction.
�
The impact is so great, the taxi turn 180 degree lor ...... - ALL wheel alignment finished.
�
If got injuries and police case, sure big big time.
�
�
�
30%/70%, civic take most of the blame?
�
Edited by Apple-Tree, 19 July 2016 - 11:35 AM.
Maybe car no power.. Want to accelerate also cannot?
�
Mazda 3 leh... where got no power?�
somemore on down slope....�
Er ........ more like honda man 100% leh ........
�
Speeding, Dangerous Driving, Reckless Driving and the USUAL .......NEVER SLOW DOWN/STOP when coming to a junction.
�
The impact is so great, the taxi turn 180 degree lor ...... - ALL wheel alignment finished.
�
If got injuries and police case, sure big big time.
�
I don't think that constitutes as a junction, though civic could face reckless driving charge.
Nope, Taxi will take majority of the blame. Civic's speed cannot be 100% determined, even with video.
Video does not show any recklessness on Civic's part. No weaving in/out, no dangerous lane cutting, just maybe going quicker than normal. But again, the speed cannot be 100% determined.
Even if the Civic was going fast, the fast driving did NOT cause the accident, it might have contributed as a factor, but the accident was entirely caused by Taxi driver's misjudgement and turning without checking for traffic.
Also, Taxi is turning while Civic going straight, it is also not a traffic junction, onus is on the taxi driver to check clear,�Taxi driver will take majority of fault. $10 bet.�
Edited by Mockngbrd, 19 July 2016 - 11:45 AM.
Also, Taxi is turning while Civic going straight, it is also not a traffic junction, onus is on the taxi driver to check clear,�Taxi driver will take majority of fault. $10 bet.�
�
�
majority mean above 50%?
�
ok who is taking the bet? �
majority mean above 50%?
�
ok who is taking the bet? �
�
yeap, taxi will take jiak than 50% imo.�
Edited by Mockngbrd, 19 July 2016 - 11:47 AM.
Nope, Taxi will take majority of the blame. Civic's speed cannot be 100% determined, even with video.
Video does not show any recklessness on Civic's part. No weaving in/out, no dangerous lane cutting, just maybe going quicker than normal. But again, the speed cannot be 100% determined.
Even if the Civic was going fast, the fast driving did NOT cause the accident, it might have contributed as a factor, but the accident was entirely caused by Taxi driver's misjudgement and turning without checking for traffic.
Also, Taxi is turning while Civic going straight, it is also not a traffic junction, onus is on the taxi driver to check clear,�Taxi driver will take majority of fault. $10 bet.��
Taxi so suay ah? but based on video, cannot determine that civic is speeding? and on two lane road, that speed can be considered reckless?
Taxi so suay ah? but based on video, cannot determine that civic is speeding? and on two lane road, that speed can be considered reckless?
Yes civic can be shown as speeding, but actual speed cannot be 100% determined, unless you think mata/insuran going to wanna spend $$$$$$$ csi the video, in most likelihood, they'll just make the taxi driver jiak the liability unless taxi driver got $$$ to fight.
Taxi turning without checking is clear cut in the video, speed of the Civic is not.�
��
�
�
Speeding is not always reckless driving. Reckless driving is not always speeding either.�
Edited by Mockngbrd, 19 July 2016 - 11:53 AM.
taxi lao made a bad call. Haiz....
�
�
On a side note, the latitude does look strong even when it is hit hard at the side.
Let see if honda airbag triggered lor,� if working,� airbag is armed after 45km/h.
�
The video cam car also at speed limit laaaa....... or faster ..... heee ...... Let also measure street lamp spacing ah .....
�
�
Yes civic can be shown as speeding, but actual speed cannot be 100% determined, unless you think mata/insuran going to wanna spend $$$$$$$ csi the video, in most likelihood, they'll just make the taxi driver jiak the liability unless taxi driver got $$$ to fight.
Taxi turning without checking is clear cut in the video, speed of the Civic is not.�
��
�
�
Speeding is not always reckless driving. Reckless driving is not always speeding either.�
�
Mazda 3 leh... where got no power?
somemore on down slope....
I don't think that constitutes as a junction, though civic could face reckless driving charge.
Yes civic can be shown as speeding, but actual speed cannot be 100% determined, and speeding action did not cause the accident. Taxi turning without checking caused it.�
Speeding is not always reckless driving. Reckless driving is not always speeding either.��
I agree with your last statement as I am always guilty of both, thus my own personal interest.
�
The authorities will judge according to the cause and effect of this case, which the cause is Civic speeding and Taxi turning without due consideration, effect of course is the accident.
�
So they will look at why the Civic is driving faster than the video speed of 53km/h(+/-), on a 2 lane road, speed limit probably 50-60km/h.
The higher the speed difference, the higher the responsibility of the Civic, that's what I assume.
�
I do not foresee the taxi taking larger share of the blame, regardless, because no.1 it is obvious Civic is speeding, no.2 Civic changed lane without signalling and no.3 if the authorities decides that if a person was jaywalking instead of a taxi turning, what would have been the consequences? I doubt Civic would be let off easy.
�
Oh Addendum: the reckless charge could arrive if the authorities questions the Civic decision to drive above speed limit in an area like this, endangering other road users and pedestrians, highly raising chances of accidents.
Edited by StefanK, 19 July 2016 - 12:04 PM.
Where got airbag? After-market light weight momo steering wheel on airbag one....
�
Let see if honda airbag triggered lor,� if working,� airbag is armed after 45km/h.
�
The video cam car also at speed limit laaaa....... or faster ..... heee ...... Let also measure street lamp spacing ah .....
�
That Honda driver is a nut case for driving at that speed along that stretch of road.� I always use that road whenever i visit my in-laws.� I would always drive cautiously at no more than 50km/h
Nope, Taxi will take majority of the blame. Civic's speed cannot be 100% determined, even with video.
Video does not show any recklessness on Civic's part. No weaving in/out, no dangerous lane cutting, just maybe going quicker than normal. But again, the speed cannot be 100% determined.
Even if the Civic was going fast, the fast driving did NOT cause the accident, it might have contributed as a factor, but the accident was entirely caused by Taxi driver's misjudgement and turning without checking for traffic.
Also, Taxi is turning while Civic going straight, it is also not a traffic junction, onus is on the taxi driver to check clear,�Taxi driver will take majority of fault. $10 bet.��
I still think taxi can push around 70% blame to the civic la. Their lawyer very good one. Seen taxi get out of getting 100% blame from rear end accident before also. If only got the first video from the car in the bus bay, hard for taxi driver to argue. But now with the new video from the car being overtaken by the civic, taxi can argue it was clear and he know can clear cuz civic was going to right lane but how he know the civic decided to change his path and aim for his taxi after he took the turn. The video does show clearly that if the civic did not change lanes so suddenly without signalling, he wouldn't have hit the taxi.
badly damaged meh? looks ok what.�
�
This Taxi the side very hard one leh. My dad ever drove this as a relief and t-boned by a bus that ran red light. Damage also not as bad as this even though the bus never even brake.
My guess (guess only hor) is the Civic was traveling at high speed on the right lane. Then the Estima was cruising at 55km/h also on the right lane which made the Civic filtered from the right to left. The Civic wanted to move back to the right lane but the Taxi came out. So at that point, he decided to move back to the left hoping that the Taxi would stopped. Guess that was why the Civic didnt brake until it was too late.�
�
As for the taxi, based on assumption again, he didnt really see the Civic because it could have been blocked by the Estima and until it was too late. Based on the two car cam video, it sure looked like a gloomy day. So gloomy day, f&f black colored car, the taxi turning busy looking out for the car turning in front of him and wanting to rush across.... accident
�
Another thing I noticed was the second cam car. It was moving off from the bus bay and made the Civic moved to the right lane to avoid it just in case it came out the bay without checking.
�
On hindsight, the Civic should have just brake the moment he saw the taxi. He could have stopped in time... �
�
(p.s. There was a mandatory give way to bus exiting from the bay - probably that was also one of the reason he was drifting from left to right)
�
Not sure. For me, I will give 50/50 or most blame to the Taxi for failure to look out for cars. But I will fine the Civic jialat jialat for excessive speed...
�
Nowadays they don't teach drivers where to swerve if really got to avoid an accident? My driving instructor did tell me that if really going to t-bone someone, best it to aim for the rear of their car at the boot area cuz that part won't be as hard as the middle or the front.�
Luckily no major injuries on this kind of bang ...
imo, both are losers ... cannot use cars and gonna have high premiums liao ..
Nope, Taxi will take majority of the blame. Civic's speed cannot be 100% determined, even with video.
Video does not show any recklessness on Civic's part. No weaving in/out, no dangerous lane cutting, just maybe going quicker than normal. But again, the speed cannot be 100% determined.
Even if the Civic was going fast, the fast driving did NOT cause the accident, it might have contributed as a factor, but the accident was entirely caused by Taxi driver's misjudgement and turning without checking for traffic.
Also, Taxi is turning while Civic going straight, it is also not a traffic junction, onus is on the taxi driver to check clear,�Taxi driver will take majority of fault. $10 bet.��
1. Based on the clip, I would say Civic's speed is about 10 to 15 km/h faster than the cam car. So if cam car is driving at 50, then civic maybe around 65.�
�
2. The taxi driver made a bad call. He took for granted there will be no car speeding that fast and assume cars going straight will slow down a bit when he is turning.�
�
3. Civic's driving skill not as good as it should be.�
1. Based on the clip, I would say Civic's speed is about 10 to 15 km/h faster than the cam car. So if cam car is driving at 50, then civic maybe around 65.
2. The taxi driver made a bad call. He took for granted there will be no car speeding that fast and assume cars going straight will slow down a bit when he is turning.
3. Civic's driving skill not as good as it should be.
I won't turn with such little allowance.
Wa bro, your malayu power sia. I only know jika anda... something something.. sembilan sembilan sembilan
The lawyer for the Civic can also argue that his client had to change lane in the last second to avoid the Taxi and that the Taxi shouldnt have make the turn. Upon seeing a (fast) car approaching should just stop
�
I think people horn you because your car is nice�
�
Next time, you step on it and let them smell smoke
�
too impatient la people. nth to do with the car. they expect me to hard accelerate 24/7 sia ... lol
i'm actually with Mockngbrd on this...
even IF the civic is speeding
even IF the civic is heavily modified
even IF the civic undertake the car cam
the onus is on the taxi driver to be ALERT, drive defensively. if you see a speeding car, or you know your lau pok chia cannot make it, why you still wanna attempt? the taxi driver failed to practise defensive driving ... when in doubt, DONT MOVE. wait for traffic to be clear if no confidence. he is turning from a minor to major, he has to give way regardless ... even driving instruction will say, "turn when it is SAFE to do so"... when you see a "speeding" car ... why risk it to save a few seconds.
The question here is: Did the taxi driver see he oncoming civic? If he did, why did he move? If he did not, why did he move?
On another note, did the taxi driver see he oncoming civic? If he did, why did he move? If he did not, why did he move?
�
�
most probably he only looked once when the car in front took the turn, that was when the civic was still further from the bus stop. By the time for him to make a turn, he probably assume the civic is not speeding or intend to slow down where the cam car was only at the bus stop.
�
�
�
I throw my 20 cent coin into the taxi at fault pool. Failing to give way etc etc
most probably he only looked once when the car in front took the turn, that was when the civic was still further from the bus stop. By the time for him to make a turn, he probably assume the civic is not speeding or intend to slow down where the cam car was only at the bus stop.
�
Singapore Reckless Drivers Videos part II Page 38 -1.png
�
�
�
and the Taxi driver could be too tired and just follow....
I throw my 20 cent coin into the taxi at fault pool. Failing to give way etc etc
�
The last I saw the minimum bet was $10�
If you cannot filter out safely it means you did not take into consideration the conditions of the vehicles on the main road notwithstanding the civic was most definitely speeding.
70/30 if I can apportion.
One thing is the type of "gar gar chut" taxi drivers....alot of them.
�
By virtue of the common age and propensity for many health-related issues for this vocation, �another contributing factor is poor depth/perspective judgement, lousy eyesight, poor reaction timing. Some of these uncle, eyesight not good also don't want to get them corrected. Corrected liao also reaction time habis. Combine all 3 and you have a recipe for disaster.
�
The worst thing is, all of them don't have good self awareness. Just because they spend alot of time on the road they think they are god of driving.
�
One anyhow chiong civic meet self-deluded god of driving with almost handicapped level of driving skills.......
�
�
I am with Mockngbrd Spawn and Fireball0088 on this. The primary cause of the accident was the taxi crossing the path of the Civic. The taxi should have yielded. We learn when turning right across traffic, give way to on coming vehicles. It does not have any other clauses such as unless it is speeding, or a modded civic or driven by an a**hole. You just give way.
The question here is: Did the taxi driver see he oncoming civic? If he did, why did he move? If he did not, why did he move?�
This accident would not have happened if (1) taxi had not turned so late, and/or (2) the civic�had not sped so fast on the 2nd lane (sometimes people wrongly assume left laners are slow coach).�
�
I say both are liable for damages. Maybe more to the taxi, but I'm not the judge and�never intended to become one.
agreed accident started by the taxi for not keeping a proper lookout... �
�
but this one i dare say i can avoid.. becoz i would zham brake when i see him turning out.. �and then all the profanities will fly out...�
�
not like the little boy and BMW case...�
�
i think to skewer the liability more to the taxi seems unfair...�
�
if the accident happened in lane 1.. �i think FAIR... �taxi shld kenna more.. �but.. lane 2... tad open for debate.. best let insurers settle...�
This accident would not have happened if (1) taxi had not turned so late, and/or (2) the civic had not sped so fast on the 2nd lane (sometimes people wrongly assume left laners are slow coach).
I say both are liable for damages. Maybe more to the taxi, but I'm not the judge and never intended to become one.
Yes but this accident would also have happened if (2a) the civic was travelling within speed limit. Imagine yourself as the civic driver driving safely, defensively and the MCF way when the taxi decided to cross your path last minute. Still bang.
Perhaps the severity of damage might not be as bad but that is another matter for the judge to think about. Which is not you.that is assuming Vehicle Y is driving sanely and responsibly right?
�
That's when the lawyers from both insurers come in to cho gang to justify their cases liao.
that is assuming Vehicle Y is driving sanely and responsibly right?
�
bro it says the turning car should exercise greater care in turning ... gotta use common sense.
�
you know the old saying ... "if you see one fool, dont let there be two."
�
if he is rushing to meet his maker / RadX, please let him be on his way without getting one's self involved
BOLA chart scenario 2. Even if honda was deemed to be speeding, taxi still takes majority of the blame.
�
�
Bro, these days seldom got 100/0% apportionment, unless 1 vehicle is going against the flow of traffic..
�
Just realized nobody posted the mandatory honda meme yet so here goes....
�
yeah lah... what I am saying is that that is the basis we start from.... that is 100% fault from the taxi and the percentages will be reduced from there based on other circumstances of the case
�
bro it says the turning car should exercise greater care in turning ... gotta use common sense.
�
you know the old saying ... "if you see one fool, dont let there be two."
�
if he is rushing to meet his maker / RadX, please let him be on his way without getting one's self involved
�
Bro, these days seldom got 100/0% apportionment, unless 1 vehicle is going against the flow of traffic..
�
got other scenario lah.
�
get hit by drunk driver�
�
100% in your "favour".�(and 100% from your pocket haha)
�
trust me, i know. lol
U Turn ah ?
�
�
�
�
that is assuming Vehicle Y is driving sanely and responsibly right?
�
yeah lah... what I am saying is that that is the basis we start from.... that is 100% fault from the taxi and the percentages will be reduced from there based on other circumstances of the case
�
Makes sense... so in this case, start at 100% for taxi and reduce to account for the Honda's crazy speed... but won't reduce culpability that much I think.
�
I think pity that when they apportion the percentage... the taxi will end up taking most of the blame. But that's the law I guess.
�
EDIT:
�
The few times I've taken transcab taxis, I've noticed the drivers are somewhat old... a cousin doing projects for them also said they are more inclusive and tend to hire oldies and disabled people more.
�
Feel sorry for the taxi driver... me having a soft spot for oldies and such...�
�
wonder if we can get stats for the average age of taxi drivers...�
Edited by ins1dious, 19 July 2016 - 03:40 PM.
I just remembered another case... the Si Gi Nah without license drove car, made a similar turn and whack into a motorcycle and subsequently a taxi that was going straight. The pillion, single mother of 2 died on the spot.
got other scenario lah.
�
get hit by drunk driver�
�
100% in your "favour".�(and 100% from your pocket haha)
�
trust me, i know. lol
�
Makes sense... so in this case, start at 100% for taxi and reduce to account for the Honda's crazy speed... but won't reduce culpability that much I think.
�
I think pity that when they apportion the percentage... the taxi will end up taking most of the blame. But that's the law I guess.
�
EDIT:
�
The few times I've taken transcab taxis, I've noticed the drivers are somewhat old... a cousin doing projects for them also said they are more inclusive and tend to hire oldies and disabled people more.
�
Feel sorry for the taxi driver... me having a soft spot for oldies and such...�
�
wonder if we can get stats for the average age of taxi drivers...�
�
Transcab also hire those rejected by comfort. I went to their office at defu before and they allow the drivers to pay rental by cash daily. Thats another good reason for old drivers to join them as most probably dont have a bank account and/or short on cash.�
To answer my own question...
�
�
�
Notice Paper No.�76 of 2015 Question No. 214 For Written Answer For Parliament Sitting On Or After�5�March 2015�
MP: Ms Irene Ng Phek Hoong
To ask the Minister for Manpower (a) how many taxi drivers, including relief taxi drivers, are there currently; (b) of these, how many are active taxi drivers on the roads; � what is their (i) average annual salary; (ii) average educational qualification; (iii) age profile; and (d) how many have been formerly working in PMET jobs and switched to driving taxis.
Answer�
- As at December 2014, about 98,000 Singaporeans held a Taxi Driver�s Vocational Licence. About 56,000 of them were registered with taxi companies. The average net monthly earnings (less expenses) of taxi drivers in 2014 was $3,173 for a single-shift operation, and $5,933 for a two-shift operation.
- Of the employed resident taxi drivers in 20141, about 8 in 10 were aged 50 and above, and over 9 in 10 possessed non-tertiary educational qualifications. We do not have data on how many taxi drivers were formerly in PMET jobs.
�
Looks like this is an old man's profession... guess I have to be more patient with them around.
It could have been avoided if the Civic braked instead of gunning for the gap in front of the Taxi.
the roof on driver side dented quite badly, likely driver kena head injuries
�
�
�
Wah so jialat... how come the traffic light breakdown after the accident? Did it detect accident and auto shut off?
Today Straits Times also report as Polo.
Cut and paste journalism. Haha ...�
I am not surprised lah.
�
Nowadays reporter just only know how to report without making any research on it, in the end making fool of themselves.�
t �hope the people in this car are OK
Is this something new with our traffic light. Got accident and immediately become hazard light for warning.. �Quite high tech stuff.
Wah so jialat... how come the traffic light breakdown after the accident? Did it detect accident and auto shut off?
You are sharp, did not notice it first time!
Persistent blinking lights means malfunction traffic lights? Possibly one of the traffic lights or the "control box" was hit by the vehicle during the accident, causing the "circuit" to malfunction.
Yes, in rollover seat belts minimise injuries.
Hope occupants ok.
Is this something new with our traffic light. Got accident and immediately become hazard light for warning.. �Quite high tech stuff.
If that's true, I'm impressed too!
But my guess is the control box kena smashed by the car liao...???
Is this something new with our traffic light. Got accident and immediately become hazard light for warning.. �Quite high tech stuff.
�
Saw what happened. The Evo knocked down a traffic light at the centre divider causing the traffic lights to malfunction
Saw what happened. The Evo knocked down a traffic light at the centre divider causing the traffic lights to malfunction
�
????
At a cross junction, green light in my direction of travel. A taxi bohue or bochap the red turn right arrow and happily made the turn and a white sedan happily followed suit.
Are we turning into a cowboy town with anything goes?
You can hear the impact and see the lights malfunction a split second before you see the car flipping over.
�
Most likely the car lost control and hit the lights on its side causing it to ownself flip ownself .�
Just got back from my "school bus" ferry service in heavy downpour and witnessed this.
At a cross junction, green light in my direction of travel. A taxi bohue or bochap the red turn right arrow and happily made the turn and a white sedan happily followed suit.
Are we turning into a cowboy town with anything goes?
There are more and more of these drivers... Just be careful and drive safely ourselves ...
Just got back from my "school bus" ferry service in heavy downpour and witnessed this.
At a cross junction, green light in my direction of travel. A taxi bohue or bochap the red turn right arrow and happily made the turn and a white sedan happily followed suit.
Are we turning into a cowboy town with anything goes?
Got this same mz2 for my wife. �Driven it a few times and noticed it has very bad blind spots. �Not very well designed mirrors, pillars and passenger seat. �Glad you reacted well.
�
�
�
Got this same mz2 for my wife. �Driven it a few times and noticed it has very bad blind spots. �Not very well designed mirrors, pillars and passenger seat. �Glad you reacted well.
�
Knowing these blind spots, then one should jolly well turn and look to ensure that there are no vehicles before filtering
U used google translate?
Can you sort out your thoughts before typing them?�
Dont understand what he was trying to say....
�
What is polis?
You can hear the impact and see the lights malfunction a split second before you see the car flipping over.
Most likely the car lost control and hit the lights on its side causing it to ownself flip ownself .
That goes without saying. �The pillars and seat are ill-designed too so less experienced drivers may not have checked their blind spot enough. � �
�
Just wanna alert other drivers to be a bit little more careful and play it a little more safe when approaching this car type. �
�
�
Knowing these blind spots, then one should jolly well turn and look to ensure that there are no vehicles before filtering
�
I was expecting godzilla to emerge right after the car finished rolling..
Edited by Pocy, 20 July 2016 - 09:40 PM.
LL driver at Pasir Ris MSCP. Should have added some shit to it.
�
What did this LL driver do?
�
Putting a rubbish bin cover on the roof and the bin in front of the car is hardly a punishment.
Yet another 'open door and whack motorcyclist' incident. Hope the bike uncle is OK. Wasted his tar-pau kopi-O. First thing car driver did was continue wiping his door panel�
�
�
SJS6034U also another impatient one. Turn left illegally instead of following the queue and turn left using the slip road.
That Honda driver is a nut case for driving at that speed along that stretch of road.� I always use that road whenever i visit my in-laws.� I would always drive cautiously at no more than 50km/h
Please keep to lane 2 for maximum 50km/hour
LL driver at Pasir Ris MSCP. Should have added some shit to it.
�
Should have spread the contents of the bin on the car as well.
�
Bike should not have cheong and try to beat the red light.
Obviously the biker fault.
What did this LL driver do?
�
Putting a rubbish bin cover on the roof and the bin in front of the car is hardly a punishment.
�
He park in the motorcycles lot
What did this LL driver do?
�
Putting a rubbish bin cover on the roof and the bin in front of the car is hardly a punishment.
�
What to do?� Complain to HDB, people say you can be more understanding or why you so f*. kpo?� �Smash car, you get charged for taking matters into your own hands because we are a civil society�and cannot condone hooliganism.
�
So the obnoxious person wins liao lor.� Game theory also say better be obnoxious or else you will lose.
What to do?� Complain to HDB, people say you can be more understanding or why you so f*. kpo?� �Smash car, you get charged for taking matters into your own hands because we are a civil society�and cannot condone hooliganism.
�
So the obnoxious person wins liao lor.� Game theory also say better be obnoxious or else you will lose.
nex time pcc on his door handle
nex time pcc on his door handle
�
Omg this got to be the most ultimate !!!�
LL driver at Pasir Ris MSCP. Should have added some shit to it.
�
�
Really inconsiderate to park at motorcycle lots ... oh well, he deserved the treatment ...
Luckily, never ganna wheel�clamp ....
30%/70%, civic take most of the blame?
�
Taxi fail to give way should take more of the blame isn't it?�
eh..bro...how come 1st sentence you say you are not anybody's child....thus wan i confuse!Isis
�ish lyrics of a song?
ish lyrics of a song?
I'm nobody's child
I'm nobody's child
Nobody wants me
I'm nobody's child
I stopped in time, but still got pushed to hit the front car. How is it that it is always the front car claim the back car?
Will see how the insurance claiming goes.
Omg this got to be the most ultimate !!!�
�
provided the pcc got STD materials in them.�
So the obnoxious person wins liao lor.� Game theory also say better be obnoxious or else you will lose.
�
who dares, wins
who dares, wins
�
Legalise guns please, pretty please.
�
Drove past this morning, not sure how it happened..
Attached Thumbnails
Drove past this morning, not sure how it happened..
�
From this angle look like police car forced the bus up the kerb haha
nex time pcc on his door handle
�
Lol, what happens if we are still halfway through and someone sight us?
�
LL driver at Pasir Ris MSCP. Should have added some shit to it.
�
This is really inconsiderate, i wonder what is on the driver's mind when they park into the lots meant for motorbikes...
�
Drove past this morning, not sure how it happened..
Sorry no video. But car in front stopped suddenly on a clear road (presumably to look at which way to go), and forced me to jam brake. I am inches away from hitting. Then Whamp! And Whamp! Chain collision. My car was pushed forward to dent the bumper of the front car, twice. Total 5 cars involved. I heard from workshop that it is ALWAYS the back car fault. So the one in front who stopped suddenly on a clear road will claim my insurance.
I stopped in time, but still got pushed to hit the front car. How is it that it is always the front car claim the back car?
Will see how the insurance claiming goes.�
No video then cannot prove what you said is true.....
In chain collision, as long as you are not the last car.� You are OK.
�
The claim procedure is "very standard". You are better off to go A-WS for repair lor. As you will be assign a portion of the total liability.
�
�
Last car ownself claim ownself lor.
�
For your case, just claim the car behind lor. And you don't have to pay excess.
�
I also kenna before.� But Income released me of all liability lor.� ????
�
�
�
�
Sorry no video. But car in front stopped suddenly on a clear road (presumably to look at which way to go), and forced me to jam brake. I am inches away from hitting. Then Whamp! And Whamp! Chain collision. My car was pushed forward to dent the bumper of the front car, twice. Total 5 cars involved. I heard from workshop that it is ALWAYS the back car fault. So the one in front who stopped suddenly on a clear road will claim my insurance.
I stopped in time, but still got pushed to hit the front car. How is it that it is always the front car claim the back car?
Will see how the insurance claiming goes.�
Sorry no video. But car in front stopped suddenly on a clear road (presumably to look at which way to go), and forced me to jam brake. I am inches away from hitting. Then Whamp! And Whamp! Chain collision. My car was pushed forward to dent the bumper of the front car, twice. Total 5 cars involved. I heard from workshop that it is ALWAYS the back car fault. So the one in front who stopped suddenly on a clear road will claim my insurance.
I stopped in time, but still got pushed to hit the front car. How is it that it is always the front car claim the back car?
Will see how the insurance claiming goes.�
That's why must learn to multitask.
�
Fcuk the car in front with horn (hold it as long as possible) while step on brake.
�
Sorry no video. But car in front stopped suddenly on a clear road (presumably to look at which way to go), and forced me to jam brake. I am inches away from hitting. Then Whamp! And Whamp! Chain collision. My car was pushed forward to dent the bumper of the front car, twice. Total 5 cars involved. I heard from workshop that it is ALWAYS the back car fault. So the one in front who stopped suddenly on a clear road will claim my insurance.
I stopped in time, but still got pushed to hit the front car. How is it that it is always the front car claim the back car?
Will see how the insurance claiming goes.�
if can prove no car �in front and jammed brake for no reason, scam is the word.
Sorry no video. But car in front stopped suddenly on a clear road (presumably to look at which way to go), and forced me to jam brake. I am inches away from hitting. Then Whamp! And Whamp! Chain collision. My car was pushed forward to dent the bumper of the front car, twice. Total 5 cars involved. I heard from workshop that it is ALWAYS the back car fault. So the one in front who stopped suddenly on a clear road will claim my insurance.
I stopped in time, but still got pushed to hit the front car. How is it that it is always the front car claim the back car?
Will see how the insurance claiming goes.Our insurance ruling is such ....last car insurance pay for everyone
Our insurance ruling is such ....last car insurance pay for everyone
�
�
sure or not? last car pay for all the cars in front?
Edited by Jellandross, 21 July 2016 - 07:28 PM.
this happened on 17/7/2016 in South Korea.
three cars totally smashed, four people were killed.
Bus driver accused of falling asleep
1st car: Kia K5
2nd car: Audi Q5
3Rd car: Hyundai Sonata i45
4th car: Samsung SM5
5th car: BMW 5GT
From the other video of the accident, all car's, except for the 5GT, are total lost case. The impact is huge!OH.MY.GOD
sure or not? last car pay for all the cars in front?
Who pay for damages not important,Cars are very cheap in Korea,the worst part of this chain collision is lost of 4 persons
�
�let's hope drivers of heavy vehicles...DRIVE safely...Esp in S'pore.
No video then cannot prove what you said is true.....
In chain collision, as long as you are not the last car. You are OK.
The claim procedure is "very standard". You are better off to go A-WS for repair lor. As you will be assign a portion of the total liability.
Last car ownself claim ownself lor.
For your case, just claim the car behind lor. And you don't have to pay excess.
I also kenna before. But Income released me of all liability lor. ????
Also agree on better to go A-WS. On this, let me share for awareness. ... the workshop touts arrived swiftly to accident scene and make me very pissed off. Have to spend half my energy to ask them to **** off, while handling the situation (raining, 4 cars owners to exchange details, huge traffic jam). They are VERY persistant. I can understand, because I heard that they will receive 3k commission immediately by bringing victims to their friend's workshop. The touts got about 3 of the victims. If I have followed the tout and not gone to my insurance assigned premium workshop, I may not have gotten the right deals, including a replacement car.
Bro Appletree, did your NCD get affected? If so, how much? I wonder how u managed to be released of all liability. Thx
Our insurance ruling is such ....last car insurance pay for everyone
Just to add... something is not morally and technically sound regarding the front car claim back car rule in chain collision. It will not discourage illicit touts from workshop and bad driving habits (stop suddenly to change direction, view road signs or taxi pick up passenger). They all can do so with zero insurance and legal cost. DISAGREE!
If can prove front most car is at fault, all cars behind should claim that one car in front.
All get camera please.
Edited by ECONOMIC, 22 July 2016 - 12:04 PM.
i wonder why the Altis driver wanted to open his door.??
to pui pui pui... My colleague got this bad habit.. I scolded him b4.. open car door to pui his spit.. knn..�
bro.. u heard of BOLA system not? now no such thing as last car pay all.. the rules has changed.. last car bear the highest liabliity will depend on how the accident happened..
Our insurance ruling is such ....last car insurance pay for everyone
�
TP now cannot reply email asking us to submit video in VCR already. It's an outdated technology and now the last man standing also decided to throw the towel and stop production lao. Haha..
Then when loss Liao.. Front car expense load in second car... Then second car try to put the front loading and own car claim to the one behind... So on and so for....
So technically it's still last car bear whole cost if proven the last car is liable for all the rest of the accident...
I was involve in a chain collision before and I am the second car... Total 4 car... All I know is I am clear of liability for the first car damage and my own car damage.
Problem is even if they break suddenly... They will say why u tail gate... Didn't dollow safety distant.Was told that that's the previous old rule. New one is as per what one bro described above.
Just to add... something is not morally and technically sound regarding the front car claim back car rule in chain collision. It will not discourage illicit touts from workshop and bad driving habits (stop suddenly to change direction, view road signs or taxi pick up passenger). They all can do so with zero insurance and legal cost. DISAGREE!
If can prove front most car is at fault, all cars behind should claim that one car in front.
All get camera please.
I clearly remember it was VCD. Not VCR.
�
�
https://sg.news.yaho...-143343722.html
TP now cannot reply email asking us to submit video in VCR already. It's an outdated technology and now the last man standing also decided to throw the towel and stop production lao. Haha..�
I clearly remember it was VCD. Not VCR.
Oops.. Psps..
Was told that that's the previous old rule. New one is as per what one bro described above.
Just to add... something is not morally and technically sound regarding the front car claim back car rule in chain collision. It will not discourage illicit touts from workshop and bad driving habits (stop suddenly to change direction, view road signs or taxi pick up passenger). They all can do so with zero insurance and legal cost. DISAGREE!
If can prove front most car is at fault, all cars behind should claim that one car in front.
All get camera please.�
I rem someone here did say that camera will promote bad driving behaviour.� I wonder what will he do in your situation despite having a 9 yr old car.
�
Was told that that's the previous old rule. New one is as per what one bro described above.
Just to add... something is not morally and technically sound regarding the front car claim back car rule in chain collision. It will not discourage illicit touts from workshop and bad driving habits (stop suddenly to change direction, view road signs or taxi pick up passenger). They all can do so with zero insurance and legal cost. DISAGREE!
If can prove front most car is at fault, all cars behind should claim that one car in front.
All get camera please.�
The reasoning behind why the back car always at fault is because the front car could be stopping for any reason but it is the back car's responsibility to keep a safe distance to ensure that there is time to react and stop. There is no reason to rear-end someone unless the driver never keep safe distance.
The reasoning behind why the back car always at fault is because the front car could be stopping for any reason but it is the back car's responsibility to keep a safe distance to ensure that there is time to react and stop. There is no reason to rear-end someone unless the driver never keep safe distance.
�
No wonder there are wonderful road hoggers who really ensure ample space in front of them
No wonder there are wonderful road hoggers who really ensure ample space in front of them
�
If its a 2s gap, I don't think considered hogging unless its on the overtaking lane. The car infront is still a hogger if he doesn't give way to a car approaching fast, even if there is another hogger in front.
No wonder there are wonderful road hoggers who really ensure ample space in front of them
If its a 2s gap, I don't think considered hogging unless its on the overtaking lane. The car infront is still a hogger if he doesn't give way to a car approaching fast, even if there is another hogger in front.
�
The road hogger doesnt need to give way what, if based on what you said
�
�
�
it is the back car's responsibility to keep a safe distance to ensure that there is time to react and stop.�
Attached Thumbnails
My case very straight forward lor ...... the moment I got out the car.
�
a) Drivers A & B "seem" to know each other as their acting skill very poor. �Even TCS will not take them as carrefare.
b) Both are smiling. They are sure very happy that day.
c) Both refuse to provide full name, particulars, insurance or as per GIA Framework.
d) Both drive off in a hurry.
�
I reported item c and d lor. Item a and b, no proof, no report. �You only reported things which you are in the know lor. �This report, very important as all parties can see and can be use as evidence in courts for you or against you. �So if judge find your essay very bad, then good luck lor.
�
Only me, Driver D & E very sian.
�
Lucky for me ??? Accident after 8 days into a new insurance cycle lor, because this type of case can pend a long time. �I got 1 year to settle lor. �I settle behind car within 2 weeks - I accept all offer anyhow lor. I very flexi one.
�
By year end renewal, I notice the premium was actually cheaper than last year. �I tot Income made a mistake. �Then they said I was released from all liabilities lor. �Not reason given.
�
NCD not affected, I got NCD protection anyway - FREE. �Was told there would be a "slight" increase premium lor if 3rd P claim successful.
�
If car usage is not high for you, suggest you take loss of use claim by money rather than courtesy car. �I got about 3K for loss of use. $120 per day for CAT B car.
�
I can take taxi everyday ....... heeeee ....... I took MRT.
�
Income has the Orange Force to take care EVERYTHING. �That why I ONLY buy Income.
�
Pray when you see a good temple, and learn and wise up lor .....
�
�
�
The 'very standard' and 'always front car claim back car' are what the A-WS told me too.
Also agree on better to go A-WS. On this, let me share for awareness. ... the workshop touts arrived swiftly to accident scene and make me very pissed off. Have to spend half my energy to ask them to **** off, while handling the situation (raining, 4 cars owners to exchange details, huge traffic jam). They are VERY persistant. I can understand, because I heard that they will receive 3k commission immediately by bringing victims to their friend's workshop. The touts got about 3 of the victims. If I have followed the tout and not gone to my insurance assigned premium workshop, I may not have gotten the right deals, including a replacement car.
Bro Appletree, did your NCD get affected? If so, how much? I wonder how u managed to be released of all liability. Thx�
The road hogger doesnt need to give way what, if based on what you said
�
Err, English not your first language? In an accident, its the rear car's fault. He chose to take the risk and tailgate/don't keep safe distance. I don't see how keeping a safe distance is being a hogger. A hogger is someone that doesn't give way to a faster car behind. Nothing to do with safe distance or not.
Edited by Nzy, 22 July 2016 - 08:59 PM.
Err, English not your first language? In an accident, its the rear car's fault. He chose to take the risk and tailgate/don't keep safe distance. I don't see how keeping a safe distance is being a hogger. A hogger is someone that doesn't give way to a faster car behind. Nothing to do with safe distance or not.
�
Yes you are right. But usually a road hogger will keep a big distance from the car in front, and doesnt really care what is going on behind him, becaue he knows that if anything, it is always the rear car's fault.�
Yes you are right. But usually a road hogger will keep a big distance from the car in front, and doesnt really care what is going on behind him, becaue he knows that if anything, it is always the rear car's fault.�
�
So? It still doesn't mean that a person who keeps a safe distance is a hogger. A hogger is just someone who doesn't want to give way to cars behind. Most hoggers know that there are cars behind. They just don't want to give way cuz they think they are travelling at the speed limit already.
You are right. �Our visibility is only the claim behind us and we claim us, that is, we claim behind and we get to choose to accept the offer to close the case. Hence a "standard" procedure.
�
After that, there is another round between insurers lor, they will assign the liabilities. If you are assign with a fault liabilities of less than 30%, then your NCD is not affected lor.
�
�
�
�
According to chain collision scenario in BOLA. Back car only claim immediate front car and so forth. No more last car bao ga liao. Even if all got car videos to show it's solely last car's fault, not sure if the insurers will deviate from guideline and all claim last car.
�
WATCH OUT !! for men in black !!
Not like this meh
or the real Men In Black
Attached Thumbnails
Edited by Toothiewabbit, 22 July 2016 - 10:52 PM.
My case very straight forward lor ...... the moment I got out the car.
a) Drivers A & B "seem" to know each other as their acting skill very poor. Even TCS will not take them as carrefare.
b) Both are smiling. They are sure very happy that day.
c) Both refuse to provide full name, particulars, insurance or as per GIA Framework.
d) Both drive off in a hurry.
I reported item c and d lor. Item a and b, no proof, no report. You only reported things which you are in the know lor. This report, very important as all parties can see and can be use as evidence in courts for you or against you. So if judge find your essay very bad, then good luck lor.
Only me, Driver D & E very sian.
Lucky for me ??? Accident after 8 days into a new insurance cycle lor, because this type of case can pend a long time. I got 1 year to settle lor. I settle behind car within 2 weeks - I accept all offer anyhow lor. I very flexi one.
By year end renewal, I notice the premium was actually cheaper than last year. I tot Income made a mistake. Then they said I was released from all liabilities lor. Not reason given.
NCD not affected, I got NCD protection anyway - FREE. Was told there would be a "slight" increase premium lor if 3rd P claim successful.
If car usage is not high for you, suggest you take loss of use claim by money rather than courtesy car. I got about 3K for loss of use. $120 per day for CAT B car.
I can take taxi everyday ....... heeeee ....... I took MRT.
Income has the Orange Force to take care EVERYTHING. That why I ONLY buy Income.
Pray when you see a good temple, and learn and wise up lor .....
Car ram into Bangkok Four Face Buddha Temple
https://m.facebook.c...id=267309952320
The reasoning behind why the back car always at fault is because the front car could be stopping for any reason but it is the back car's responsibility to keep a safe distance to ensure that there is time to react and stop. There is no reason to rear-end someone unless the driver never keep safe distance.
Anyway, not keen for a debate as I am more concerned about whiplash now.
Ya I know that theory. Only good as a general guide, as there are exceptions. So, your last sentence is not true. I rear ended the front car even though I kept a safe distance and thus able to stopped in time. You know why? Because after I have stopped, the car behind me pushed me to hit the front car. So how is your last statement true?
�
You should be able to claim from the car behind since you stopped in-time. Btw, if the car behind you is tailgating, keep a bigger gap from the car infront so that there will be more time to slow down gradually. Or just get out of his way. Lol. That is taught in driving school. So it is still the responsibility of the car behind to ensure that there is enough space. The car infront can't increase the space so not his fault if there is not enough time for the cars behind to stop.
�
So, if you can prove that you stopped in-time but the car behind pushed you forward, you'll be able to claim from the car behind for your medical bills and damages and whatever the first car is claiming from you also.
Edited by Nzy, 22 July 2016 - 11:33 PM.
So? It still doesn't mean that a person who keeps a safe distance is a hogger. A hogger is just someone who doesn't want to give way to cars behind. Most hoggers know that there are cars behind. They just don't want to give way cuz they think they are travelling at the speed limit already.
Thanks bro for sharing. Surprise that this day and age still got pple refuse to exchange particulars and ID. Sibei Kah. ...
Just take some pix especially with the license plate and go, change particulars for what?
Let the insurance co handle all these.
Singapore drivers and bikers alike like to chiong red light. This biker deserved it. Look at the speed he was travelling to chiong the light. Must have seen amber and went faster but light already changed when he crossed.
Don't know why SG still don't implement controlled turning for all junctions.. this will minimise all risk..
If already going at speed limit, should not be considered a road hogger even behind vehicle coming at a higher speed exceeding the speed limit.
�
here we go again ......�
No wonder there are wonderful road hoggers who really ensure ample space in front of them
�
Encountered one idiot silver Merc C180 on CTE going south towards AYE. �Fella left about 300m clear in front of him. �I overtook him on the left at AMK Ave 5 area and after I drove off, saw him blocking an ambulance the same way all the way to the PIE/Serangoon Rd exit area. �
Don't know why SG still don't implement controlled turning for all junctions.. this will minimise all risk..
�
Too used to current rules. A change also not simple.
here we go again ......�
�
Lazy educate these buggers liao.. Later become flame war again.
�
Cannot argue with stupidity one.. They will drag you down to their level & beat you with experience.
Lazy educate these buggers liao.. Later become flame war again.
Cannot argue with stupidity one.. They will drag you down to their level & beat you with experience.
stubborn ones especially those old farts, ego bigger than the sky one....
cano never understand road hoggers means roger hog even if u stick to speed limit.
Encountered one idiot silver Merc C180 on CTE going south towards AYE. Fella left about 300m clear in front of him. I overtook him on the left at AMK Ave 5 area and after I drove off, saw him blocking an ambulance the same way all the way to the PIE/Serangoon Rd exit area.
I know their mentality. If based on what Nsy said, they will not bother to give way at all coz if rear ended its the fault of the rear car. And they keep a big space in front so that they won't hit any car in front. Selfish mentality to the max.
Lazy educate these buggers liao.. Later become flame war again.
�
Cannot argue with stupidity one.. They will drag you down to their level & beat you with experience.
�
I agree with you.
�
Actually i feel Singapore is too well regulated, resulting in extreme intolerance..("hey thats illegal you know!!")
As can be evidenced by sooo many bo liao websites like stomp and also so many minor things on the road..
all post big big on social media to name and shame..
�
Really...let who has not sinned cast the first stone..
Ironically thats the actual reason why got so much ungracious and guai lan behaviors.
As long as legal can liao.
Let me illustrate my point.
�
In JB, if got car tailgate super close.. Come very fast from behind. Will you give way? I would. Why? Who knows if the guy behind is up to no good or trying to rob me..
In SG, KNN, i am legal... bloody tailgater .. you cannot do anything to me. If i angry i jam brake.. cos if accident is your fault..
�
�
In the US, not happy with anyone on the road.. you play jam brake? Or 3rd finger? Or cut people off? Or would you , suah.. just overtake and ignore. I most likely just ignore.
Why? Who know if the fella is armed with a gun?
Or maybe he is driving like an a**hole cos he is a drug dealer running from police?
Wait if i give him the finger or piss him off, he start shooting at me?
�
In my opinion, the potential threat of violence with very little or limited recourse actually makes people more tolerant.�
I agree with you.
Actually i feel Singapore is too well regulated, resulting in extreme intolerance..("hey thats illegal you know!!")
As can be evidenced by sooo many bo liao websites like stomp and also so many minor things on the road..
all post big big on social media to name and shame..
Really...let who has not sinned cast the first stone..
Ironically thats the actual reason why got so much ungracious and guai lan behaviors.
As long as legal can liao.
Let me illustrate my point.
In JB, if got car tailgate super close.. Come very fast from behind. Will you give way? I would. Why? Who knows if the guy behind is up to no good or trying to rob me..
In SG, KNN, i am legal... bloody tailgater .. you cannot do anything to me. If i angry i jam brake.. cos if accident is your fault..
In the US, not happy with anyone on the road.. you play jam brake? Or 3rd finger? Or cut people off? Or would you , suah.. just overtake and ignore. I most likely just ignore.
Why? Who know if the fella is armed with a gun?
Or maybe he is driving like an a**hole cos he is a drug dealer running from police?
Wait if i give him the finger or piss him off, he start shooting at me?
In my opinion, the potential threat of violence with very little or limited recourse actually makes people more tolerant.
Not just violence
Threat of anything also![[sly]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tPPDUtwJdWjZHxQM5mkVa-pWbJ8qq9E7YFDASWN2-cq6OUjK3jb7YjtWvTVquv8fSVkLIqm6_srT6OHlhMZtncL6T_GBjLPRkiW1VtVWCQVLXIIq9GG60wv2X3163wig8BxEY=s0-d)
Be aware of ur surroundings.. Someone wants to go faster than you.. Yield lane 1. It's called being considerate..
Knn, I have no idea why those self righteous ego farts trying to argue about?
Seem too many, ignored way too many.
signal left, overtake and bye bye to u.
Driver's legs impaled after car crash in Bukit Timah
http://www.straitsti...-in-bukit-timah
SINGAPORE - A driver's legs were impaled by a road divider after he crashed his car on Upper Bukit Timah Road on Saturday (July 23) morning.
The 26-year-old man was trapped and officers from the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) extricated him from the car with hydraulic rescue tools.
The accident, involving one car, happened near Springdale Condominium in the early hours of Saturday morning at about 3.30am.
The crash victim was conscious when he was taken to the National University Hospital, SCDF said.
It is understood that a metal rod from the road divider had penetrated both his thighs.
Eyewitnesses told Shin Min Daily News that the car flipped over when it crashed.
Five passers-by stopped to help, the report said. They turned the car over and waited with the driver for help to arrive.
They also kept the driver awake by talking to him while they waited, one witness said.
SCDF said it sent one fire engine, a Red Rhino, one ambulance and a support vehicle to the scene.
Edited by Jellandross, 23 July 2016 - 08:50 PM.
Reminder to all drivers who had passes their BTT eons ago
Keep left
50.��When driving along, keep well to the left and as near as practicable to the edge of the road, except when you intend to overtake or turn right. Do not hog the middle of the road. This applies to dual carriageways as well.
�
Looks like he lost control and crash. Its a lancer.
Driver's legs impaled after car crash in Bukit Timah
http://www.straitsti...-in-bukit-timah
SINGAPORE - A driver's legs were impaled by a road divider after he crashed his car on Upper Bukit Timah Road on Saturday (July 23) morning.
The 26-year-old man was trapped and officers from the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) extricated him from the car with hydraulic rescue tools.
The accident, involving one car, happened near Springdale Condominium in the early hours of Saturday morning at about 3.30am.
The crash victim was conscious when he was taken to the National University Hospital, SCDF said.
It is understood that a metal rod from the road divider had penetrated both his thighs.
Eyewitnesses told Shin Min Daily News that the car flipped over when it crashed.
Five passers-by stopped to help, the report said. They turned the car over and waited with the driver for help to arrive.
They also kept the driver awake by talking to him while they waited, one witness said.
SCDF said it sent one fire engine, a Red Rhino, one ambulance and a support vehicle to the scene.�
�can only imagine the shock and trauma�
�
Was there this morning. Thought they would have erected barrier
�
Was there this morning. Thought they would have erected barrier
IMG_20160724_101450.jpg
wtf happened? fight ah
�
Heard got about 6 vehicles involved in the accident.
Hope the people is fine and the main culprit to be punished heavily
The cam guy very happy....
�
Give running commentary... walk here..walk there.... snigger and laughing....
�
If there are no injured to help, move aside. Want to gawk, gawk from the side, don't act as if he is the TP walk around the accident site freely.
�
Some people just have too much time on their hands.
�
�
Fatal Accident this morning KJE....blue tent come out...
�
�
SINGAPORE - A massive jam formed on Kranji Expressway (KJE) on Monday (July 25) morning following a serious accident between a car and a motorcycle.
The accident during the morning rush hour took place in the direction of the Pan Island Expressway (PIE) after the Brickland Road exit.
�
In a tweet at 5.54am, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) advised motorists to avoid lanes 1 and 2 on the affected stretch of KJE.
�
In a subsequent tweet at 8.36am, it said the accident had caused congestion up to the entrance of the Bukit Timah Expressway (BKE).��Police said in a Facebook post at 8.58am that all roads had been opened back up to traffic.���
�
�
�
�
The cam guy very happy....
�
Give running commentary... walk here..walk there.... snigger and laughing....
�
If there are no injured to help, move aside. Want to gawk, gawk from the side, don't act as if he is the TP walk around the accident site freely.
�
Some people just have too much time on their hands.
�
I hear so many "wah wah WAH"
wtf happened? fight ah
�
Fatal Accident this morning KJE....blue tent come out...
�
�
SINGAPORE - A massive jam formed on Kranji Expressway (KJE) on Monday (July 25) morning following a serious accident between a car and a motorcycle.
The accident during the morning rush hour took place in the direction of the Pan Island Expressway (PIE) after the Brickland Road exit.
�
In a tweet at 5.54am, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) advised motorists to avoid lanes 1 and 2 on the affected stretch of KJE.
�
In a subsequent tweet at 8.36am, it said the accident had caused congestion up to the entrance of the Bukit Timah Expressway (BKE).��Police said in a Facebook post at 8.58am that all roads had been opened back up to traffic.���
�
Was caught in the jam this morning.. the accident caused all road leading out of CCK to jam up.. normal commute to my mom's place turn out to be 30 mins instead of the normal 10 mins
�
SKS645J Civic
Dangerous driving in Malaysia after pump petrol (Without Paying)
This kind of idiot really bloody spoil market, next time they will want sg cars to put deposit too if more of this kind of things happen.�
SKS645J Civic
Dangerous driving in Malaysia after pump petrol (Without Paying)
This kind of idiot really bloody spoil market, next time they will want sg cars to put deposit too if more of this kind of things happen.
Edited by uniquely_ad, 25 July 2016 - 11:46 AM.
This is the Civic that was stolen in Malaysia last year leh
�
�
�
SKS645J Civic
Dangerous driving in Malaysia after pump petrol (Without Paying)
This kind of idiot really bloody spoil market, next time they will want sg cars to put deposit too if more of this kind of things happen.�
�
wtf happened? fight ah
If fight and hurt�people, the jail terms may be higher then a traffic accident...
�
SKS645J Civic
Dangerous driving in Malaysia after pump petrol (Without Paying)
This kind of idiot really bloody spoil market, next time they will want sg cars to put deposit too if more of this kind of things happen.�
�
Very old video. Posted before already.
The cam guy very happy....
�
Give running commentary... walk here..walk there.... snigger and laughing....
�
If there are no injured to help, move aside. Want to gawk, gawk from the side, don't act as if he is the TP walk around the accident site freely.
�
Some people just have too much time on their hands.
�
If he's there at that kind of timing, probably have too much free time lo.
Saw someone post this
Punggol area (beside SPC)
�
Edited by Mcf777, 25 July 2016 - 12:47 PM.
Saw someone post this
Punggol area (beside SPC)
�
�
Looks like distracted and going quite fast.
Looks like distracted and going quite fast.
�
yes i agree. the lorry must be driving too fast and not keeping lookout for oncoming traffic.
Driver got time to honk but did not try to siam at all.....
�
Fatal Accident this morning KJE....blue tent come out...
�
�
�
SINGAPORE - A massive jam formed on Kranji Expressway (KJE) on Monday (July 25) morning following a serious accident between a car and a motorcycle.
�
The accident during the morning rush hour took place in the direction of the Pan Island Expressway (PIE) after the Brickland Road exit.
�
In a tweet at 5.54am, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) advised motorists to avoid lanes 1 and 2 on the affected stretch of KJE.
�
In a subsequent tweet at 8.36am, it said the accident had caused congestion up to the entrance of the Bukit Timah Expressway (BKE).��Police said in a Facebook post at 8.58am that all roads had been opened back up to traffic.���
�
It's Monday morning blues.
�
Fatal Accident this morning KJE....blue tent come out...
�
�
SINGAPORE - A massive jam formed on Kranji Expressway (KJE) on Monday (July 25) morning following a serious accident between a car and a motorcycle.
The accident during the morning rush hour took place in the direction of the Pan Island Expressway (PIE) after the Brickland Road exit.
�
In a tweet at 5.54am, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) advised motorists to avoid lanes 1 and 2 on the affected stretch of KJE.
�
In a subsequent tweet at 8.36am, it said the accident had caused congestion up to the entrance of the Bukit Timah Expressway (BKE).��Police said in a Facebook post at 8.58am that all roads had been opened back up to traffic.���
�
OMG!� RIP!
�
Looks like distracted and going quite fast.
Camera
Cartrain dreaming man -Speed is hard to judge, but didn't try to siam at all,
and it was obvious that the lorry wasn't slowing down...
�
Another "my road" clueless driver...
�
Of course - the lorry will loose in the insurance claim (as he should)
Driver got time to honk but did not try to siam at all.....
Local driver mentality. Anything, horn first, then 'father/mother' come out from mouth, then pray hard the other party do the siam manoeuvre for them...
Looks like distracted and going quite fast.
Full impact, never apply brake until impact
RadX haven't announce gate open yet already got some slip through liao?
�
Saw someone post this
Punggol area (beside SPC)
�
�
cam car hit the hardest part of a lorry. The corner.
�
why the need to chiong at a junction even though you may have the right of way.
White car bumper looks like there's blood. Maybe hit a pedestrian.
I think is oil ...you can see quite a big pool of "vital car fluid" beside the taxi
100% Guaranteed No Top No Rebate.
�
+ Airbag Triggered + Total Loss + Injuries.
�
Speeding ? What Speeding ?
�
�
Unless got 3rd Party Video.�
�
Every week seems like 3~4 COE got recycled.
�
�
�
�
Saw someone post this
Punggol area (beside SPC)
�
�
�
White car looks like Uber car. Recently so many Sienta, Altis, Vezel and Axio added onto the road as Uber. Could likely be one of them.
100% Guaranteed No Top No Rebate.
�
+ Airbag Triggered + Total Loss + Injuries.
�
Speeding ? What Speeding ?
�
�
Unless got 3rd Party Video.�
�
Every week seems like 3~4 COE got recycled.
�
It should be 3-4 COE lost every week.
Unless otherwise, all COE get to be reborn as another cat ?
�
�
It should be 3-4 COE lost every week.
�
�
�
The junction traffic lights got accident detection system? All started blinking when the impact happened!
cam car hit the hardest part of a lorry. The corner.
why the need to chiong at a junction even though you may have the right of way.
Unless otherwise, all COE get to be reborn as another cat ?
�
Going forward, very likely these COE will dissappear.� Unlikely to be re-born.
Going forward, very likely these COE will dissappear.� Unlikely to be re-born.
You gave LTA another idea. Maybe next time, cars that are written off due to accident, COE will not recycle. Lol. Then can go carlite.
Edited by Nzy, 25 July 2016 - 07:13 PM.
Saw someone post this
Punggol area (beside SPC)
�
�
Another angle.
�
The airbags never activate??
You gave LTA another idea. Maybe next time, cars that are written off due to accident, COE will not recycle. Lol. Then can go carlite.
�
Darwinian selection for COE? Ha! Good idea!
Another angle.
�
�
spruce up like racer but without racer reflexes?
Another angle.
�
�
It pays to adopt defensive driving. Yes, no doubt the car is in right of way and lorry should have have been more vigilant, this accident can be avoided if defensive driving has been adopted. At the end of the day, it is a lose lose for both of them
You gave LTA another idea. Maybe next time, cars that are written off due to accident, COE will not recycle. Lol. Then can go carlite.
�
I did not give LTA any idea.� Look at the data i put in Car-Lite.� COE is disappearing as & when cars are scrapped.
Saw someone post this
Punggol area (beside SPC)
I did not give LTA any idea. Look at the data i put in Car-Lite. COE is disappearing as & when cars are scrapped.
It pays to adopt defensive driving. Yes, no doubt the car is in right of way and lorry should have have been more vigilant, this accident can be avoided if defensive driving has been adopted. At the end of the day, it is a lose lose for both of them
�
�
Agreed ... no need to chiong chiong all the way across traffic lights�even though�you have the right of way ...
Some idiots who have no right of way, also chiong ... in the end, both suffered ...
�
Just drive safe and let go accelerator upon reaching near traffic lights ...
Another angle.
�
Hahaha.. Been curious what car is it that go head on with the lorry. Though the Hyundai will win the case, but he will not drive an "original" car anymore. Anyway, this Hyundai car also damn stupid, see it coming but don't want to slow down, or no attempt to slow down. My car, even 9 year 11 months I also won't go and head on like that. Win doesn't mean head on and is ok. Or maybe his front already chui, need new spray paint. Or radiator already going to spoil, go and bang and change a new one. If because of that, then I say he is smart to "leech" on the insurance. Anyway, sticker until like that, I don't think he drive like a saint. * General stereotype for people who tia sticker and think their car can from Lancer become Evo and Civic become Type R*
Hahaha.. Been curious what car is it that go head on with the lorry. Though the Hyundai will win the case, but he will not drive an "original" car anymore. Anyway, this Hyundai car also damn stupid, see it coming but don't want to slow down, or no attempt to slow down. My car, even 9 year 11 months I also won't go and head on like that. Win doesn't mean head on and is ok. Or maybe his front already chui, need new spray paint. Or radiator already going to spoil, go and bang and change a new one. If because of that, then I say he is smart to "leech" on the insurance. Anyway, sticker until like that, I don't think he drive like a saint. * General stereotype for people who tia sticker and think their car can from Lancer become Evo and Civic become Type R*
some time there is alot other factor.
�
out of job?
�
maybe his burget damn tight?
, but the car radiator leak,
a/c fail ,
lower arm ball joint break.
�
1 lorry want to go against the law ,, lai lo buang loh.�
�
anyway no job now, insurance claim gao gao, car repair swee swee, spare car some more,
no job relax in hospital bed loh.
Darwinian selection for COE? Ha! Good idea!
�
spruce up like racer but without racer reflexes?
�
The car look ugly, Iron man wannabe....
The driver is too slow to react (did not anticipate the lorry turning)
�
Sounds like a lady, if not the passenger must be a lady.
�
Does not look like it banged purposely. If not, there would not be any screaming
�
I've seen that white van with it's gaudy golden body kits many times around Bedok and Tampines... imho... the look is somewhat
�
�
I suspect that new Toyota's driver was stunned upon seeing that and reacted more violently than me... all the cabs and the beemer in-between are just collateral damage of someone throwing up.
�
Screamed like orgasm coming.
It pays to adopt defensive driving. Yes, no doubt the car is in right of way and lorry should have have been more vigilant, this accident can be avoided if defensive driving has been adopted. At the end of the day, it is a lose lose for both of them
�
I think the driver distracted. The reaction time really slow.
The junction traffic lights got accident detection system? All started blinking when the impact happened!
�
Interesting observation. Why did the lights flash at point of accident?
�
driver doing initial D ah. in wet weather some more. bloody idiot.
�
edit: wait looks like he mount kerb all the way? wtf sia
Edited by Sp4wn, 26 July 2016 - 04:38 PM.
Saw someone post this
Punggol area (beside SPC)
�
�
My guess is that the driver was probably not concentrating on the road, probably distracted by handphone or something, from the car plate number, the car should have another 3 years to go, it makes no sense to try to claim insurance... Anyway, hope that both parties are all ok.
Tyre no good in wet? Brakes no good in wet? Car suspension no good so cannot take corner on wet? Most prob lousy driver in wet weather!
seems like car�skidded for no reason??
�
�
�
Got reason ah. Cock driver is the reason.
A case of road hogger giving his explanation to TP officer when asked to stop over in Taiwan. Sorry to those who dun speak Mandarin or non-chinese. The driver is dissatisfied that he is being booked.
F10 polis car wor.
A case of road hogger giving his explanation to TP officer when asked to stop over in Taiwan. Sorry to those who dun speak Mandarin or non-chinese. The driver is dissatisfied that he is being booked.
Bloody typical Road Hogger & his self serving lame excuses.
TP should give him an additional summon for being argumentative.
TP should give him an additional summon for being argumentative.
Wah, like that many of the locals will get the summons lei.
You know lar, our locals will NEVER ever admit they are wrong, even if caught red-handed one.
This is call "pak-see-mai-jin" aka "kena beaten till death also don't admit".
Edited by Kingkong, 28 July 2016 - 01:24 PM.
seems like car�skidded for no reason??
�
�
Is there anyone else who noticed that this joker did not brake at all? Only until the very end then he/she remembered to brake. Seems like tio stunned like a vegetable!
Is there anyone else who noticed that this joker did not brake at all? Only until the very end then he/she remembered to brake. Seems like tio stunned like a vegetable!
�
IMO, the driver did the right thing. Braking when the tires got no grip and already sliding won't help much. Might even make it worse. Better to just leave the pedals alone and try to steer in the direction the car is sliding and hope the front tires regain traction.
IMO, the driver did the right thing. Braking when the tires got no grip and already sliding won't help much. Might even make it worse. Better to just leave the pedals alone and try to steer in the direction the car is sliding and hope the front tires regain traction.
�
Yes, it true.
It similar to braking during a sharp corner at fast, car can lose control easily.�
Should always brake before entering the corner.
IMO, the driver did the right thing. Braking when the tires got no grip and already sliding won't help much. Might even make it worse. Better to just leave the pedals alone and try to steer in the direction the car is sliding and hope the front tires regain traction.
�
True if driver brakes really hard. But shouldn't it be better to brake slightly as compared to no brake at all?
�
Anyway my guess is (still) the driver was totally stunned... you look at the end of the video, car was going straight at a slow speed on the left most lane and it had traveled for some distance before the brake was depressed.
�
Edited by Madtari, 28 July 2016 - 03:01 PM.
maybe just do a full lock and pull the hand brake.....
�
spin the car in circles..
maybe just do a full lock and pull the hand brake.....
�
spin the car in circles..
�
�
skali flip and turn the car a few round �
�
True if driver brakes really hard. But shouldn't it be better to brake slightly as compared to no brake at all?
�
Anyway my guess is (still) the driver was totally stunned... you look at the end of the video, car was going straight at a slow speed on the left most lane and it had traveled for some distance before the brake was depressed.
��
You are totally wrong.
�
I had lost traction before in gravel road.� I had lift-off throttle and keep my steering wheel straight.� The more you try to do anything, the worse it will be.
�
Eventually, when the car is slow to a crawl, i slowly step on the brake until stationery.
�
maybe just do a full lock and pull the hand brake.....
�
spin the car in circles..
�
Calling RadX to do body collection
Is there anyone else who noticed that this joker did not brake at all? Only until the very end then he/she remembered to brake. Seems like tio stunned like a vegetable!
I call this Lau Lan, want to take corner but end up "drifting" like shit.
A case of road hogger giving his explanation to TP officer when asked to stop over in Taiwan. Sorry to those who dun speak Mandarin or non-chinese. The driver is dissatisfied that he is being booked.
http://im1.shutterfl...00AZMWrNkzcN2Lg
A case of road hogger giving his explanation to TP officer when asked to stop over in Taiwan. Sorry to those who dun speak Mandarin or non-chinese. The driver is dissatisfied that he is being booked.
Drive on overtaking lane when other lanes are empty - checked
Insist nothing wrong with driving at speed limit on overtaking lane even when not overtaking- checked
Clueless about hogging a long chain of cars behind - checked
See police kancheong jam brake - checked
After much explanation, still don't understand why his action is road hogging - checked
Every response to police is "but but but..." and "becos.. becos.. becos..." - checked
Suppose to "rush" home after work so he can't understand why he is hogging goondu logic - checked
Cannot differentiate between keeping within speed limit and road hogging - checked
Ownself say ownself as law-abiding safe driver - checked
Seems like road hogs everywhere give same excuses one leh.
Overall I find the officer was quite nice n patient.
The driver made known he didnt exceed speed limit and asked if it was a routine random road check when pulled over. The officer acknowledged the first point n said he will let him know soon.
Officer then clearly explained reason of pulling him over simply bcos he traveled in the wrong lane with inappropriate speed causing a long tail of vehicles behind. Officer stressed that he had been observing driver for a while then decided to pull him over inconsideration of safety.
Officer educated that the extreme left lane should be used only for overtaking purpose n speed in this lane normally hovers between 100 to 110 km/h, but officer said he had already gave chance to driver by lowering to 90km/h.
Officer went on to explain that he had to pull driver over as a last straw when driver further tapped his brake upon seeing officer bringing the speed even lower in the leftmost lane to 88km/h as that is far too slow.
What happened later in the video was the driver trying to justify that it was purely logically human nature to brake whenever they see an officer so he should not be booked just bcos of that n went on (gentlemanly, actually hypocritically) to stress that should not be a way to treat law abiding citizen. Driver stressed to officer that 2km/h slower should not get him a ticket. Officer said its not 2km/h but 12km/h dropping fr 100km/h. 90km/h was the speed that officer lowered n wanted to give some chance.
Driver explained he has no opportunity of moving bk to inner lane as it was occupied with cars exceeding speed limit (if I m not wrong), officer said the vehicles had to exceed speed limit to overtake him on wrong lane bcos he is far too slow by taking up that overtaking lane. In addition to that braking was a potential accident hazard to others.
Driver then requested for a warning but officer said (this is the best part) if no amount of education can cultivate, then a summon had to be in place. Officer stressed that he had to do his job as a road enforcer.
Driver insisted he had been wronged n stated he will not sign. Officer said driver has all the right not to sign as driver can decide to appeal or not.
Driver later post this video up on web to air his fustration.
Hope my summary is clear as it could for non-chinese or non-mandarin speaker.
umbrella flew out from lorry, taxi e-brake .
cam car slow to react
his/her scream sounds like another porker
Just run over it lah!
Umbrella fly out need to brake one meh?
Just run over it lah!�
�
�
panic mah, people do funny thing when they are panic �
True if driver brakes really hard. But shouldn't it be better to brake slightly as compared to no brake at all?
�
Anyway my guess is (still) the driver was totally stunned... you look at the end of the video, car was going straight at a slow speed on the left most lane and it had traveled for some distance before the brake was depressed.
��
Already answered but no, you don't want to transfer any more weight off the rear.
�
FWD car so a driver who knew what he/she was doing/was and was confident enough would probably just power out of it.
�
But then again a driver who knew what he/she was doing wouldn't have gotten into that situation in the first place.
panic mah, people do funny thing when they are panic
Because gong see chia
umbrella flew out from lorry, taxi e-brake .
cam car slow to react�
his/her�scream sounds like another porker�
�
�
I have to say cam driver is really slow and possibly is not aware of the traffic beyond the car directly in front of him.�
�
Accident is totally and easily avoidable if cam driver pays more attention to the wider surrounding.�
don't think is an umbrella. more like a folded tarpaulin cover that got unfurled by the air turbulence generated when the lorry drove pass the chemical tanker.
�
�
umbrella flew out from lorry, taxi e-brake .
cam car slow to react�
his/her�scream sounds like another porker�
�
�
I have to say cam driver is really slow and possibly is not aware of the traffic beyond the car directly in front of him.�
�
Accident is totally and easily avoidable if cam driver pays more attention to the wider surrounding.�
�
huh ? you mean he supposed to have bionic eyes to know about falling umbrellas ?�
�
Which accident is not avoidable ? And what do you mean by "wider surroundings"�
�
When a vehicle in front jams brake, nothing the car behind can do except to hope the distance is far enough and he have 6 Pot Brembos
��........... that said, i agree that the cam car driver reaction a bit slow. Perhaps distracted cos he wants to switch lanes thus when he looked back in front BAM too late�
don't think is an umbrella. more like a folded tarpaulin cover that got unfurled by the air turbulence generated when the lorry drove pass the chemical tanker.
�
umbrella lah, you can see the centre "stick" �
Edited by Othello, 29 July 2016 - 10:46 AM.
I beg to differ...cam car was probably still in the midst of completing his lane changing. His eyes might be looking at the blindspot or side mirror at the split second when the taxi jammed brake.�
umbrella flew out from lorry, taxi e-brake .
cam car slow to react�
his/her�scream sounds like another porker�
�
�
�
Cam car seems to be straddling the lane? Like undecided whether to change lane or not?
Cam car seems to be straddling the lane? Like undecided whether to change lane or not?
�
just very slowmo lane change. those kind take 10years to change lane ones....
http://www.straitsti...angi-coast-road
�
1 killed, 5 injured after accident on Changi Coast Road.� Accident this morning.
umbrella flew out from lorry, taxi e-brake .
cam car slow to react�
his/her�scream sounds like another porker�
�
�
maybe hot kopi spill on LP during impact lor ...�
maybe hot kopi spill on LP during impact lor ...�
�
aiyo. very unfortunate.
�
How to do claim?
�
edited "ops...I meant the accident of the taxi and car" hahaha
Edited by Jthl, 29 July 2016 - 12:19 PM.
aiyo. very unfortunate.
�
How to do claim?
�
cam car already got issues of his own by hitting back of teksi ... hot coffee spill on LP is lan lan lor ...�
�
anyways, not a good idea to have open drinks in the car.
�
noticed some cars have cup holders situated above the HU ... not a good design me thinks ...
aiyo. very unfortunate.
How to do claim?
edited "ops...I meant the accident of the taxi and car" hahaha
So? It still doesn't mean that a person who keeps a safe distance is a hogger. A hogger is just someone who doesn't want to give way to cars behind. Most hoggers know that there are cars behind. They just don't want to give way cuz they think they are travelling at the speed limit already.
And 50% of hoggers are�usually�using/looking at their handphone/tablet.
Umbrella fly out need to brake one meh?
Just run over it lah!ehh .. ehhh .... ehhh . . . my um um um brella
�
http://www.straitsti...angi-coast-road
�
1 killed, 5 injured after accident on Changi Coast Road.� Accident this morning.�
�
�
Looks like a forrester?
Looks like a forrester?
That stretch is haunted.
Why not blame it on driver's fatigue?
�
If ppl say it's haunted....I say there got aliens.
Edited by Watwheels, 29 July 2016 - 03:48 PM.
Why not blame it on driver's fatigue?
If ppl say it's haunted....I say there got aliens.
http://www.straitsti...angi-coast-road
1 killed, 5 injured after accident on Changi Coast Road. Accident this morning.
So far never encounter any ghosts, fairies, aliens, vampires or werewolves there. Speedsters quite a few. Pls be considerate to beings from alternate dimensions. Don't always blame them for problems caused by humans.
Edited by Jellandross, 29 July 2016 - 04:22 PM.
Looks like a forrester?
�
Forester 2.0 NA
That stretch is haunted.
�
When Terminal 5 comes up this stretch will be no more.
Hmmm, accident don't look that bad. No seatbelt perhaps?
�
pretty bad according to Channel 8's news..SCDF needed to use hydraulic cutter
�
I beg to differ...cam car was probably still in the midst of completing his lane changing. His eyes might be looking at the blindspot or side mirror at the split second when the taxi jammed brake.�
�
Analyze-schmanalyze - at the end of the day, still the camera vehicle's fault for ramming the taxi.�
�
http://www.straitsti...angi-coast-road
�
1 killed, 5 injured after accident on Changi Coast Road.� Accident this morning.�
�
�
all 6 in the same car? �
Cam car should check rear and sides (also blind spots) then the lane he wanted to filter before starting to filter lane. Careless driving.
Well, all the checking in the world is useless if the car IN FRONT jams brake
the report only states 1 car lehall 6 in the same car?
Edited by Othello, 29 July 2016 - 06:39 PM.
all 6 in the same car? �
Should be. Since article say car crash into tree. Never mention any other car or pedestrians involved.
all 6 in the same car?
Just watched Ch8 news. Yes. All in one car. Age from 20 to 30 years old.
Drive on overtaking lane when other lanes are empty - checked
Insist nothing wrong with driving at speed limit on overtaking lane even when not overtaking- checked
Clueless about hogging a long chain of cars behind - checked
See police kancheong jam brake - checked
After much explanation, still don't understand why his action is road hogging - checked
Every response to police is "but but but..." and "becos.. becos.. becos..." - checked
Suppose to "rush" home after work so he can't understand why he is hogging goondu logic - checked
Cannot differentiate between keeping within speed limit and road hogging - checked
Ownself say ownself as law-abiding safe driver - checked
Seems like road hogs everywhere give same excuses one leh.�
That must be my bil you are quoting.
Just watched Ch8 news. Yes. All in one car. Age from 20 to 30 years old.
�
So early, that age range and all men ....... hmmmm�
�
Maybe from Navy�
Edited by Othello, 29 July 2016 - 08:25 PM.
No this is not a movie.
�
simi car so chiu�
�
�
�
lane splitting some more lah�
No this is not a movie.
�
wah piang !!! i wonder whether the cam car is lucky or he moved off cos he looked at his rear mirror�
Edited by Othello, 29 July 2016 - 08:43 PM.
simi car so chiu�
�
All I can say is it looked like a Rolls Royce in the end.
No this is not a movie.
what did he crash into?
�
Car skidded and crashed into center kerb. Likely speeding.
No this is not a movie.
I think this car should be a RWD car,in excess speed of at least 120km/hwhen the driver took this right hander,it look like 'oversteer'.
Forester 2.0 NA
Forester has 5 stars crash rating
Thought it is a safer car to drive
Or the drive was speeding...
Forester has 5 stars crash rating
Thought it is a safer car to drive
Or the drive was speeding...
If Driver is Speeding,hit a tree when skidded,10 stars crash rating also useless...
Just 1 death is consider very lucky....
All I can say is it looked like a Rolls Royce in the end.
�
Looks too small to be RR. Door handle also wrong. Maybe its the mitsuoka.
recently like a lot of skidding accidents....pls try to minimize this by checking your tyres....if treadwear is low, pls get it change. Esp if u like to speed. Not only for your own safety but other road users own safety.
�
You might want to be cheapskate and refuse to change, but pls do not drag other road users into your accident.
pretty bad according to Channel 8's news..SCDF needed to use hydraulic cutter
�
Looks like the car hit the tree really hard. The engine flew out.
No this is not a movie.
�
Look a bit like a Camry...??
Look a bit like a Camry...??
�
I think it's Chrysler 300C.
I enjoy taking the longer route sometimes to drive on changi coast rd. Very relaxing and easy drive during light traffic. At that hour and traffic, can't imagine how to get into such a car wreck.
So far never encounter any ghosts, fairies, aliens, vampires or werewolves there. Speedsters quite a few. Pls be considerate to beings from alternate dimensions. Don't always blame them for problems caused by humans.
Vampire?
Forester has 5 stars crash rating
Thought it is a safer car to drive
Or the drive was speeding...
Idiot driver reduce it to 1 star.
I think it's Chrysler 300C.
i think so, with chrome wheels and red caliper brakes!
look like the driver takes the slight �R hand bend corner too fast (?speeding)
hope driver ok and no one else/pedestrian injured
and yes, cam car was very fortunate to have move off.
Edited by alphard96, 30 July 2016 - 02:35 AM.
Look a bit like a Camry...??
More like old model Toyota Mark-X.
i think so, with chrome wheels and red caliper brakes!
look like the driver takes the slight �R hand bend corner too fast (?speeding)
hope driver ok and no one else/pedestrian injured
and yes, cam car was very fortunate to have move off.
�
this is the road leaving Sin Ming industrial estate, small road and in the direction of residential area.
�
crazy to be driving at such speed at this stretch�
this is the road leaving Sin Ming industrial estate, small road and in the direction of residential area.
�
crazy to be driving at such speed at this stretch�
�
i wonder if the black car will be charged for beating the red light�
�
Anyway cam car is damn lucky, apparently it is an Uber car with passenger on board.�
i wonder if the black car will be charged for beating the red light�
�
Anyway cam car is damn lucky, apparently it is an Uber car with passenger on board.�
�
maybe black car driver enjoyed the duck rice at sin ming and then fell asleep at the wheel ...�
�
think the guy not only beat red light, probably crashed into it too ...�
No this is not a movie.
LTA hotspot area, probably got illegal mod.. Saw LTA officer speed up to run... Speed is Gg quite fast at that small road area
LTA hotspot area, probably got illegal mod.. Saw LTA officer speed up to run... Speed is Gg quite fast at that small road area
�
LTA hotspot is understatement .......... LTA just 10s away !!!!!!�
No this is not a movie.
or was that just sunlight reflection
Yep, safety + smelly + hygiene distance behind a dump truck. In all cases, will switch lane and zoom ... zoom off.
Wanna gate crash LTA, minimum also need a dump truck full of cement Hahahahahahahamaybe intention was to crash into LTA office ... but GPS map not updated so build up speed at wrong junction ...
can see car black car was building up speed and getting ready to turn right towards LTA direction ...
Lol officers always lurk ard that area
Agreed,too many WorkShops doing illegal modification there..
Re : Sin Ming Road Accident
�
Another video from another car cam
�
https://web.facebook...207321126486413
�
And it gets even juicier�
�
Apparently, inside the Saab were 3 mechanics !!!�
If Driver is Speeding,hit a tree when skidded,10 stars crash rating also useless...
Just 1 death is consider very lucky....
Agree, ...so far, not many can win a tree...
Re : Sin Ming Road Accident
�
Another video from another car cam
�
https://web.facebook...207321126486413
�
And it gets even juicier�
�
Apparently, inside the Saab were 3 mechanics !!!�
�
Embedded.
�
Just a normal straight road. Except for suicide, I can't think of another possibility of crashing a car like this.
�
Oh wait.. there's idiocy too.
�
Edited by Jellandross, 30 July 2016 - 03:52 PM.
Re : Sin Ming Road Accident
�
Another video from another car cam
�
https://web.facebook...207321126486413
�
And it gets even juicier�
�
Apparently, inside the Saab were 3 mechanics !!!�
�
aiyo .. hope for their own sake its their car and not customer's car ...�
No this is not a movie.
�
bugger trying to drift the corner but epic failure.
cam car damn fortunate to miss that by seconds
bugger trying to drift the corner but epic failure.
cam car damn fortunate to miss that by seconds
Super lucky...
Re : Sin Ming Road Accident
Another video from another car cam
https://web.facebook...207321126486413
And it gets even juicier
Apparently, inside the Saab were 3 mechanics !!!
either taking a joyride or unintended acceleration arh?
This is the reason why I always hang around the workshop while my car is being serviced.�
Look a bit like a Camry...??
�
after seeing another time, my best guess would be a mark x
�
er3682 also mentioned that it is a RWD so it fits.
audi driver is just a super idiot.
there are just situations where there is no way u can win, no matter what, u need to let the other guy go first.
�
this example describe it best, merc just see show, let audi do 1000 point turns also LL have to wait for merc to complete his parking
�
that being said, merc head in parallel lot is a noob mistake.
at the end of the day, is 2 kuku drivers creating the joke of the day
![[smash]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sZ5balaiNvbhw4-AG6SR-00mlhTTdJpiJ6boG8PjPfbEBnvpL3VvHnqFKsCZi-l-FNCDW02nLBPHpR4JJQzzee3ZBOcB5MaFSbuI1Nm0DVxSQlQ7-ki1PqxEYNoNdDxOSk6vIa=s0-d)
�
if I am the merc (as if I can afford one), I would take my own sweet time to park at the lot in front instead reversing into the lot initially taken by the audi.
Wanna gate crash LTA, minimum also need a dump truck full of cement HahahahahahahaCreative car body works
��and super clear
Creative car body works
Hahahahaha
Coe bites the dustRe : Sin Ming Road Accident
Another video from another car cam
https://web.facebook...207321126486413
And it gets even juicier
Apparently, inside the Saab were 3 mechanics !!!
Workshop how to pay?
Sin ming one
Hahahahaha
Coe bites the dust
Workshop how to pay?Car washer see the cement
��throw away the water pale
��and go to buy acid for the cleaning �
Sin ming one
Hahahahaha
Coe bites the dust
Workshop how to pay?
Car washer see the cement
Just set fire claim insurance
OwnerDoes not matter. Add one to the recycled Coe.
Edited by Mustank, 30 July 2016 - 07:57 PM.
i think so, with chrome wheels and red caliper brakes!
look like the driver takes the slight R hand bend corner too fast (?speeding)
hope driver ok and no one else/pedestrian injured
and yes, cam car was very fortunate to have move off.
Power is nothing without control.
Sorry, not being black hearted but I do not hope the driver is ok. This kind of f**ked up and reckless driver, I hope he injured himself. Driving so fast on small roads, it's lucky he didn't injured innocent people.
Power is nothing without control.
Embedded.
�
Just a normal straight road. Except for suicide, I can't think of another possibility of crashing a car like this.
�
Oh wait.. there's idiocy too.
�
The driver deserved a Jail sentence,God Bless there are no people on the other side of the road,or else when this car crash over the other side of the road,so got people got killed.
Re : Sin Ming Road Accident
Another video from another car cam
https://web.facebook...207321126486413
And it gets even juicier
Apparently, inside the Saab were 3 mechanics !!!Creative car body works
�
this fella will buy the car..suits him
�
�
For the Changi Coast Road accident I think the NS boy and friends had finish an excercise and were on their way home. During my NS time we were told not to ride or drive to camp becoz they were instances where NSF lost their life due to fatigue. Driver could have doze off while the rest of the NS boys are already fast asleep. No one to keep the driver awake.
�
I do not support the "haunted" theory coz we know there are a lot of logistics and contruction vehicles using that stretch of road. Why the accidents are always passenger cars? Why not tipper trucks, lorries, vans or pickups? Why are they immune to the "haunted" stretch of road?
For the Changi Coast Road accident I think the NS boy and friends had finish an excercise and were on their way home. During my NS time we were told not to ride or drive to camp becoz they were instances where NSF lost their life due to fatigue. Driver could have doze off while the rest of the NS boys are already fast asleep. No one to keep the driver awake.
I do not support the "haunted" theory coz we know there are a lot of logistics and contruction vehicles using that stretch of road. Why the accidents are always passenger cars? Why not tipper trucks, lorries, vans or pickups? Why are they immune to the "haunted" stretch of road?
Class 4 class 5
No joke
Ghost don't touch no professional chaps
Lorry people are pros, make a living out of lorrying
Class 4 class 5
No joke
Ghost don't touch no professional chaps
�
Lorry ppl are aliens lah.
Lorry ppl are aliens lah.
Because they are pros
Hear 1st person account of private clerk driving Ferrari/maserrati to base... reason being that is the only available car in the family for him to drive.
�
Even the Generals and rear admirals drive B&B cars....i guess it is for modesty sake.
�
ASK....drive car during NS time. very satki.
�
Hear 1st person account of private clerk driving Ferrari/maserrati to base... reason being that is the only available car in the family for him to drive.
Even the Generals and rear admirals drive B&B cars....i guess it is for modesty sake.
Got things one, don't wanna show
No thing one, wanna show
�
Years ago, when I send my new car for servicing, I caught the mechanics having a good time in my car.
The radio was switched to chinese station (I don't listen to chinese prog), the aircon was full blast and they were enjoying their time there.
Years ago, when I send my new car for servicing, I caught the mechanics having a good time in my car.
The radio was switched to chinese station (I don't listen to chinese prog), the aircon was full blast and they were enjoying their time there.
Nothing wrong with ASK. If I am rich, I would also buy a car for my son to drive to camp.
�
If i am rich, i will hire 1 maid & 1 driver outside of the camp waiting for my son.
If i am rich, i will hire 1 maid & 1 driver outside of the camp waiting for my son.
Please drive safe people!
Edited by Jellandross, 01 August 2016 - 12:09 PM.
Mother (maid) and father (driver) already waiting outside the camp. Haha ..........
�
That's the peasant version.
�
Which elite mother and father wait outside camp?
If i am rich, i will hire 1 maid & 1 driver outside of the camp waiting for my son.
Rich ?
You must have high taste and extra ordinary standard, despatch these to camp fetching your son
��in Singapore with the help of �
�Stomp and Social Media spiralling effects �
Attached Thumbnails
Rich ?
You must have high taste and extra ordinary standard, despatch these to camp fetching your son
�
Can used on the road meh?
�
That's the peasant version.
�
Which elite mother and father wait outside camp?
�
Have lah .... you never watch Ah Boy to Man ?
�
Lim Peh and Irene Ang always fetch Chow Ken to/from camp in their Ma C Dee.
I'm pretty numb to various driver antics on the road but I can't stand red-light beaters. Nowadays, whether you're driver or pedestrian, don't proceed blindly just because the light turns green.
Please drive safe people!
Ah Neh standing at traffic light so cool watching the speeding truck passing in green man favour and stepping out onto the road like nothing "unusual" �
Very brave indeed �
Have lah .... you never watch Ah Boy to Man ?
�
Lim Peh and Irene Ang always fetch Chow Ken to/from camp in their Ma C Dee.
�
Ma C Dee is for peasants lah
�
Elite use My Bach.
Ma C Dee is for peasants lah
�
Elite use My Bach.
�
Ma C Dee S class is very elite for me liao.
Can used on the road meh?
Request OTP aka One Time Permit from your MP
Edited by 2BDriver, 01 August 2016 - 12:44 PM.
Ma C Dee S class is very elite for me liao.
�
Ma C Dee S class in Sg is as common as Corolla.� Where got elite?
Request OTP aka One Time Permit from your MP
�
Thanks for enlightening me.
�
I nvr know PAP MP so powderful.
Ma C Dee S class in Sg is as common as Corolla. Where got elite?
Thanks for enlightening me.
I nvr know PAP MP so powderful.
Ma C Dee S class in Sg is as common as Corolla.� Where got elite?
This is "get real" elite choices of car �
Attached Thumbnails
He say request... Didn't say will approve... Send to wrong party by the time approve Son pop liao
My MP always helps us to write letter
��and say
Rich ?
You must have high taste and extra ordinary standard, despatch these to camp fetching your son
This one leh? Hehehe
Ah David look them
��no up lah ��
? ? ? ? ? ? � ? ? ? ? � �
Edited by 2BDriver, 01 August 2016 - 01:11 PM.
Can used on the road meh?
There used to be horse carriage ride in Sentosa. I patok with my ex gf and we rode in it ard Sentosa.
There used to be horse carriage ride in Sentosa. I patok with my ex gf and we rode in it ard Sentosa.
Excuse
��me Mr.Li, I got confused �
May I
Ah David look them
大 � � � � � � � 马 � � �
This one leh
If David uses these ? �
Not his son
��he himself will become very famous ��
Attached Thumbnails
Edited by 2BDriver, 01 August 2016 - 01:33 PM.
My MP always helps us to write letter
Unless u Heng Heng.. Get a legal train "volunteer" letter writer to serve u while u go meet the MP session.ABD: Mr LTY, does it mean next time I can ask the AD to state in the repair bill that my steering wheel cannot control properly if I accidentally did a illegal U turn sir?
LTY: As long as your car have no hairline crack, why not.
Honestly, LTY found to be friendly and helpful, I voted for him in last GE but couldn't save him remain in power�
I meant "Tickle Ah Huat"
Edited by 2BDriver, 01 August 2016 - 02:23 PM.
Honestly, LTY found to be friendly and helpful, I voted for him in last GE but couldn't save him remain in power�
I meant "Tickle Ah Huat"
�
"this person keeps coming to see me. can you just waive it off so he can leave me alone? otherwise, every time he see me, i'm going to come see you ..."
�
(added "..." for dramatic pause and effect)
How can i be satki than PM?
This 1 for my son
My Bach S600
Honestly, LTY found to be friendly and helpful, I voted for him in last GE but couldn't save him remain in power
I meant "Tickle Ah Huat"
Anyway... No problem is a small problem... Everyone hell is different. Just don't call for people to meet up to catch rat but on that destinated timing off phone and go missing can Liao.
Edited by Joseph22, 01 August 2016 - 02:36 PM.
"this person keeps coming to see me. can you just waive it off so he can leave me alone? otherwise, every time he see me, i'm going to come see you ..."
�
(added "..." for dramatic pause and effect)
I assumed, he wrote at below �
This resident in my constituency found to be too poor
�and close both
�eyes ? �
Huat, tickle you with my previous experience from one of my monday 8pm. MPS. �
�
My MP was LTY and he'd seen me thrice to cancel one TP summon of "Fail to Signal Turning" into TPY Lor 6.
LTY: Mr.F..., you had committed a traffic offence ! You know ?...........................
�
wah, this offence everyday can see hundreds of times ..... you are very lucky !!!�
wah, this offence everyday can see hundreds of times ..... you are very lucky !!!�
YarLor, speeding
�SAAB at Sin ming Road and hell driving Heavy Truck along East Coast Service Road never catch, chased me 2 km for "failed to signal in turning" in TPY Lor 6 �
That's why I must use my wit
�to squeeze out of narrow escape within our bestest of best Monday 8pm. MPS system
��loop hole lor �
Edited by 2BDriver, 01 August 2016 - 03:26 PM.
YarLor, speeding
That's why I must use my wit
I believe u write yourself and send them invoice together will also can waive one lah
Just plainly wanted to maximise the usefulness of their GE slogan "We Care for YOU" �
��
For the Changi Coast Road accident I think the NS boy and friends had finish an excercise and were on their way home. During my NS time we were told not to ride or drive to camp becoz they were instances where NSF lost their life due to fatigue. Driver could have doze off while the rest of the NS boys are already fast asleep. No one to keep the driver awake.
�
I do not support the "haunted" theory coz we know there are a lot of logistics and contruction vehicles using that stretch of road. Why the accidents are always passenger cars? Why not tipper trucks, lorries, vans or pickups? Why are they immune to the "haunted" stretch of road?
�
Not just driving to camp, I ever had 2 instances as a vehicle commander where my drivers almost fall asleep while driving. One was driving a 3 tonner and I had to shake his shoulder to keep him awake. The other time was in despatch car where I had to hold on to the steering when last minute I noticed the driver falling asleep and the vehicle was not keeping in lane. This one more dangerous coz we were on expressway.�
YarLor, speeding
That's why I must use my wit
�
Next time, write a complaint letter on your summon.� You might also get waiver.� Civil servant scares complain letter.
"this
personidiot keeps coming to disturbing me in every monday MPS. can you just waive it off so he and me can move on ? otherwise, every time he see me in MPS, i'm going to miss National issues such as MRT breaksdown..."�
(added "..." for dramatic pause and effect)
What a beautiful Monday �
��
I believe u write yourself and send them invoice together will also can waive one lah
My personal experience, attached hospital invoice to show but was rejected by TP with a standard reply. MP just one letter, next my traffic light offence put on record, 12 demerit points waived, fine also waived. Very Heng!! Really depends who signed off the letter.
His case is more straight forward.
Next time, write a complaint letter on your summon.� You might also get waiver.� Civil servant scares complain letter.
David, in Singapore....we must know how to "play dead", kindly recall those "High profile" insane who got into deep shit for nothing, my Monday evening MPS is a tactical movement learned from SAF to act dead and let enemies pass then shoot into their back side �
David, in Singapore....we must know how to "play dead", kindly recall those "High profile" insane who got into deep shit for nothing, my Monday evening MPS is a tactical movement learned from SAF to act dead and let enemies pass then shoot into their back side �
�
How much you spend?
�
I rather take those time to piak piak
How much you spend?
�
I rather take those time to piak piak
The sensation from MP saying "Congratulation"
�Bravo ! My didi stands like hard rock to plays the wet valley �
wah, this offence everyday can see hundreds of times ..... you are very lucky !!!�
�
See your luck one lo. I have been warned by TP for not stopping at stop line also. I slowed down but main road totally no cars so I just drove out. Just nice one TP rode out from bus bay and caught up with me to give me a warning.
Edited by Nzy, 01 August 2016 - 07:02 PM.
chio bu bm driver
chio bu bm driver
�
waist and legs a bit thick lei ...�
�
Stuttgart vs Munich
Edited by Blueray, 01 August 2016 - 08:22 PM.
You sure is not auntie bus driver?
�
confirm bm driver, saw it with my lausai eyes :)
waist and legs a bit thick lei ...�
�
Stuttgart vs Munich
�
aiyoh, forget to bring measuring tape to measure :)
�
aiyoh, forget to bring measuring tape to measure :)
�
use eye power lor ...�
No face no talk
Man in long sleeves these days are most likely pte hire vehicle driver than banker, lawyer lor.
�
Woman pte hire captain too, dress in this manner lor.
�
�
Men in this type of long sleeves on Sunday, imply Property Agents.
�
�
And every last weekend of the month, you get to see many people in suitcase roaming the street lor.
�
�
�
�
�
�
You sure is not auntie bus driver?
�
Lol... Didn't know LTY so humorous
Saya kahwin sama dia lor, simpang dia di JB Skudai rumah untuk spare alat alat
you all should focus on accident not the not so chio bu...
�
�
sotong driver.. don't know kena accident
actually nothing happen leh. the car only almost bump together but hasn't bumped yet. I think the red car know about that, he/she did slow down but eventually move off as nothing happen.
Was driving 1st lane last weekend on SLE near Lentor Exit, then this white honda civic cut from 3rd lane to my lane even though I was going a high speed and had no intention of letting him cut. Somemore the gap between my car and the car in front was just 2 car space.
He sensed that i was accelerating to prevent him from cutting, and he accelerated even faster
Perhaps sensing that he was in the wrong, he tried to get away from my car and accelerated damn fast towards the car in front before braking hard.
As my family was in the car, i just let it go.
Have you encountered such rude and senseless drivers?
If I don't increase my defensive mode, and continue my speed, who knows something might happen, either me or him or together
When one is driving at lane 1, one must close the gap. I think he is doing that, not because he sense he is in a wrong and want to get away from your car.
You did the right thing. But even if your family is not inside, you can also let it go. Coz it is really nothing.
Frankly speaking 2 car space can also cut in. But must be good at it in terms of safety and timing so that it minimize the interruption to the flow of traffic. When I am in a rush I do a lot of overtaking and cornering so I don't see why the civic can't do that.
But what I want to know is, did the civic signal when going from 3rd to 1st
you "easy meat" mah....or some will say "low hanging fruit"
�
YarLor, speeding
That's why I must use my wit
�
I think what MPs are most scared of at MPS are those retirees/semi-retirees with time to prove their point!
�
�
Just plainly wanted to maximise the usefulness of their GE slogan "We Care for YOU" �
�
Was driving 1st lane last weekend on SLE near Lentor Exit, then this white honda civic cut from 3rd lane to my lane even though I was going a high speed and had no intention of letting him cut. Somemore the gap between my car and the car in front was just 2 car space.�
�
He sensed that i was accelerating to prevent him from cutting, and he accelerated even faster�
�
Perhaps sensing that he was in the wrong,�he tried to get away from my car and accelerated damn fast towards the car in front before braking hard.�
�
As my family was in the car, i just let it go.�
�
Have you encountered such rude and senseless drivers?�
�
ego bruised so come here to seek refuge.....
Was driving 1st lane last weekend on SLE near Lentor Exit, then this white honda civic cut from 3rd lane to my lane even though I was going a high speed and had no intention of letting him cut. Somemore the gap between my car and the car in front was just 2 car space.�
�
He sensed that i was accelerating to prevent him from cutting, and he accelerated even faster�
�
Perhaps sensing that he was in the wrong,�he tried to get away from my car and accelerated damn fast towards the car in front before braking hard.�
�
As my family was in the car, i just let it go.�
�
Have you encountered such rude and senseless drivers?�
�
Road hogger should get off lane 1.�
Was driving 1st lane last weekend on SLE near Lentor Exit, then this white honda civic cut from 3rd lane to my lane even though I was going a high speed and had no intention of letting him cut. Somemore the gap between my car and the car in front was just 2 car space.�
�
He sensed that i was accelerating to prevent him from cutting, and he accelerated even faster�
�
Perhaps sensing that he was in the wrong,�he tried to get away from my car and accelerated damn fast towards the car in front before braking hard.�
�
As my family was in the car, i just let it go.�
�
Have you encountered such rude and senseless drivers?�
�
Regardless of the car I drive, I make it a point to be faster than a car on my right if I am changing into their lane. So if there is a gap and I am slightly in front or alongside but the car is not speeding up, I do the speeding up.
�
I close THAT gap between this car and the other car in front, to me that's driving to traffic conditions. If my back is close to your front, I am cutting you. If my front is close to the back of the car in front, I am giving you time to react so you don't bloody rear end me.
�
Because you boh bian LL "suay suay" let a White Civic jip-ed your 'Conti' (assumption), you buay song?�
�
Road hogger should get off all lanes.� �
�
Refined the statement for you.
Was driving 1st lane last weekend on SLE near Lentor Exit, then this white honda civic cut from 3rd lane to my lane even though I was going a high speed and had no intention of letting him cut. Somemore the gap between my car and the car in front was just 2 car space.�
�
He sensed that i was accelerating to prevent him from cutting, and he accelerated even faster�
�
Perhaps sensing that he was in the wrong,�he tried to get away from my car and accelerated damn fast towards the car in front before braking hard.�
�
As my family was in the car, i just let it go.�
�
Have you encountered such rude and senseless drivers?�
�
�
Based on your 1st para, you have 2 cars length in-between, and seeing that someone want to come in-between, you speed up as you have no intention of letting him in ...
�
Why? Sometimes, just let go a bit, won't delay your journey by more than�a few�mins, right?
Let go, and drive with less stressful and enjoy your rest of the journey, isn't this better? :)
I think what MPs are most scared of at MPS are those retirees/semi-retirees with time to prove their point!
�
It was damn funny events that I will never forget in my entire lifetime but too bad video recording wasn't allowed at his Towner Road RC office, if not....I'll show you LTY facial and candid reactions.
He stood up from his chair in "setiya" position raised his right hand to shake my hand, male RC assistant sitting beside him follows his stand-up and sit down motions.
While both of us exchanging in conversations, his assistant keep notes and moving his head forward to backward like the Jew's praying.
My 3 times MPS meeting with LTY is just like NSF days meeting my camp OC except without stamping foot and salute.
It was damn funny events that I will never forget in my entire lifetime but too bad video recording wasn't allowed at his Towner Road RC office, if not....I'll show you LTY facial and candid reactions.
He stood up from his chair in "setiya" position raised his right hand to shake my hand, male RC assistant sitting beside him follows his stand-up and sit down motions.
While both of us exchanging in conversations, his assistant keep notes and moving his head forward to backward like the Jew's praying.
My 3 times MPS meeting with LTY is just like NSF days meeting my camp OC except without stamping foot and salute.Read up some of the recent posts. Some people are not fit to drive.
99% of the time
�
ownself pwn ownself when posting own videos
�
Came in to post a video... i am utterly pissed at this driver. Similar case like yours,�Wanted to filter to the middle lane but saw this White Volkswagen SJV8755T filtering from the right most lane so i filter back to my lane. Who knows he drove next to me to try and cut into my lane even though there is less than half a car length of gap for him to do so.. Normally i don't post video but this guy really last warning. Am i at fault? yes, maybe. You guys be the judge ba...
�
�
P.S: no. i am not gung ho. neither was my ego affected also. I am simply just utterly pissed that this driver can ignore others safety and simply do what he wants to.
�
I think maybe the driver was pissed when you tried to filter, hence must die die cut you. This type of driver just have to ignore and hope one day he meet Mr Dump Truck lor.�
99% of the time
ownself pwn ownself when posting own videos
You're at fault
�
Be so rude and inconsiderate for what?� You didn't notice the roadworks in front - which was the reason for him needing to filter?
�
Be trying to block, you're just slowing down all traffic, and making life more dangerous for all of us.� The road is a shared space, there was no need to insist on stopping him from merging - if you had taken no action at all, he could have merged safely...
I dont think the cam car is rude. You crazy or what? That white Volk cut in so abruptly. If i am the cam car, i also dont let him pass.
He know in front is roadwork then he must slow down and follow behind ma.�
Edited by Dscheng, 02 August 2016 - 03:51 PM.
u asked ppl to be the judge.. then tell people you dont want to start a war of words when others ask you why so inconsiderate...�
�
to me.. at the 17~20secs mark.. he already in your lane liao.. you encroach into the bus bay on your left to try and cut him out one last time.. .�
�
you slow down 1~2 secs.. everyone can go smoothly.. case close... � �kpkb abit in the car... �then let it go ....... you dont need to waste your time uploading the video...�
�
life goes on...�
�
he is not happy with someone cutting into his lane but doesn't want to block people properly... there were a few opportunities to "cut" him back... bus bay was one of them...
�
i just realised that he said he is not a gung ho person then all the more should just let it go...
�
in the end, LL still lost. So better to just let it go and don't post here. It just make you more angry...
I dont think the cam car is rude. You crazy or what? That white Volk cut in so abruptly. If i am the cam car, i also dont let him pass.
He know in front is roadwork then he must slow down and follow behind ma.�
Except he didn't cut in abruptly - there was tonnes of space - and it was obvious he was merging.�
�
the cam car didn't want to give up "his" road...
All he need is lift off gas for a second or two and everything merge...instead try to use bus bay to block the white car...why?� prove what?
�
When got one lane blocked like this, you "block" the lane, just ends up delaying everyone.� Why?� So you can feel better about yourself that you "won" the road?
u asked ppl to be the judge.. then tell people you dont want to start a war of words when others ask you why so inconsiderate...�
�
to me.. at the 17~20secs mark.. he already in your lane liao.. you encroach into the bus bay on your left to try and cut him out one last time.. .�
�
you slow down 1~2 secs.. everyone can go smoothly.. case close... � �kpkb abit in the car... �then let it go ....... you dont need to waste your time uploading the video...�
�
life goes on...�
�
sigh.. post a video nia.. become my fault his fault. I inconsiderate i 70% blame whatsoever. Ok lah.. i take the bitter pill and swallow. Anyway being the video uploader, may i request all to just discuss on this matter amicably and don't get so work up. pls....�
�
If i don't waste time uploading video, then what is this thread for? Anyway, please ALL don't get so work up.
�
PS: it's my last post since i'm a newbie. �
Looks like the driver either had to avoid cam car or cam from lane 1.
�
When he started trying to filter there was more than 2 car lengths (the full width of the side road and then some)...
�
Cam car either oblivious or deliberately trying to block .� Then tries to claim 1/2 car length?� No there wasn't - when white SUV starts to filter there was plenty of space, but cam car took attitude of "my road" - never giving any sort of allowance for roadworks in front.� Which he didn't even notice until he cut out in an effort to overtake the white car again.
�
If apportioning blame, I would put 70% on cam car and 30% on white SUV
�
It's obvious here that the white car is trying to merge...no enough space? 1/2 car length?�
�
I think it's a 50/50. It was a quick filtering all the way from the Lane 1
Except he didn't cut in abruptly - there was tonnes of space - and it was obvious he was merging.�
�
the cam car didn't want to give up "his" road...
All he need is lift off gas for a second or two and everything merge...instead try to use bus bay to block the white car...why?� prove what?
�
When got one lane blocked like this, you "block" the lane, just ends up delaying everyone.� Why?� So you can feel better about yourself that you "won" the road?
�
You watch properly... the white car was really rude. He was forcing his way in. At the beginning, the cam car already wanted to filter to the middle lane but moved back because the white car was also filtering. In this sense, the cam car already "let" the white car in. Then the white car went on to force himself into the left lane because:
1. He can clearly see the road works ahead
2. He needed to turn left after the road works
�
The cam car was just angry and reacting that way...
If you really need to go middle lane, just let VW filter in front of you and you filter to middle lane behind him at the same time. �Leverage on each other's manoeuvre, both achieve objective and win-win situation. �
�
This manoeuvre is very effective when there are two cars needing to filter into each other's lane at the same time. �Once both parties see each other's signal, experience will determine who takes the front or back and just switch lanes like a dance. �I'm sure many experienced drivers do this on a daily basis with no fuss.
�
There are many ways to achieve your objective and sometimes being in front may not be the best way. �This is true on the road as well as in life.
�
Seriously, if i am going straight for a long while, i would have filtered to the right and zoom far far away already.... but that's just me�
You watch properly... the white car was really rude. He was forcing his way in. At the beginning, the cam car already wanted to filter to the middle lane but moved back because the white car was also filtering. In this sense, the cam car already "let" the white car in. Then the white car went on to force himself into the left lane because:
1. He can clearly see the road works ahead
2. He needed to turn left after the road works
�
The cam car was just angry and reacting that way...
Totally agree with Fireball0088 lo. Big F Volkswagen thinking he is big shot die die want to cut in. Big ego.
video poster said he is gone liao
�
can stop the discussion already
�
You watch properly... the white car was really rude. He was forcing his way in. At the beginning, the cam car already wanted to filter to the middle lane but moved back because the white car was also filtering. In this sense, the cam car already "let" the white car in. Then the white car went on to force himself into the left lane because:
1. He can clearly see the road works ahead
2. He needed to turn left after the road works
The cam car was just angry and reacting that way...
I think this sums up what happened perfectly.
To put another spin on it...
From the point where white car tried to merge to left lane....who had to take a "bigger action" to make it work?
Who would have been more "inconvenienced" in giving way to the other?
Seriously, if i am going straight for a long while, i would have filtered to the right and zoom far far away already.... but that's just me�
�
cannot, cos that is a turning lane�
You watch properly... the white car was really rude. He was forcing his way in. At the beginning, the cam car already wanted to filter to the middle lane but moved back because the white car was also filtering. In this sense, the cam car already "let" the white car in. Then the white car went on to force himself into the left lane because:
1. He can clearly see the road works ahead
2. He needed to turn left after the road works
�
The cam car was just angry and reacting that way...
�
all these can be non issue... if car cam juz ease up 1~2 secs.... �
�
ps.. no one saying white car angel la.. ��
�
sometimes.. bigger man... �easier..�
You watch properly... the white car was really rude. He was forcing his way in. At the beginning, the cam car already wanted to filter to the middle lane but moved back because the white car was also filtering. In this sense, the cam car already "let" the white car in. Then the white car went on to force himself into the left lane because:
1. He can clearly see the road works ahead
2. He needed to turn left after the road works
�
The cam car was just angry and reacting that way...
�
IMO, the white car was behaving normally till the cam car decided to block him off. There was more than enough space for the white car to filter in without slowing down the cam car but cam car decided to speed up so that there will be less than 1/2 car gap. White car also got angry when cam car block him so start to play also...
Edited by Nzy, 02 August 2016 - 04:14 PM.
Realised many drivers not gracious enough to give way lol.
�
Then claim not ego problem.. but ming ming jiu shi.
You only have to punch the information into a computer once.
What's the rulebook say on getting out of a hole?
Chapter 1....stop digging.
Is good for your health and re all tasty
The cam car was just angry....
I think this sums up what happened perfectly.
To put another spin on it...
From the point where white car tried to merge to left lane....who had to take a "bigger action" to make it work?
Who would have been more "inconvenienced" in giving way to the other?�
The big white SUV knows he is going to turn left. So next time, filter much earlier. It would be a much happier for everyone
cannot, cos that is a turning lane�
�
Oh is it....
actually I don't want to reply one. But since you ask if you are at fault, then yes you are. He signal to come to lane 2, you not fast enough you let him in. Since you�can't get in, you sibei tulan. See him wanna come into lane 3, you jit tao lut but your don't know what car, cannot out accelerate a Turbo DSG VW. Then kan pua tulan this time round, zip here and there. Actually, match up to his side so what? He hiu lan you totally. Like that ownself ego bruised. People wanna cut let them cut lor. Cut lose to people then buy more powerful car next time. No point come here post video say how lousy the other party is when you ownself neh si chiong to cut him off.
�
I'm in this situation many times. I went into other's lane and move on. Drive like normal but the driver behind both hands gesturing "simi lan bird", trying to zip around heavy traffic to catch up to my side. Finally, he did. I'm happy for him cause he finally caught up. When I saw him, I shake my head and accelerate and off I go. he is way behind and still cursing and swearing.
�
Moral of the story? That driver don't give a shit about you when you chase him, he lagi won't care about you even you post a video of him cutting into his lane.
�
you da man lah !!!�
all these can be non issue... if car cam juz ease up 1~2 secs.... �
�
ps.. no one saying white car angel la.. ��
�
sometimes.. bigger man... �easier..�
�
maybe the white car should ease up and go behind the cam car...�
�
signal does not mean the cam car has to let him in... and it was clear that the cam car was not letting him in, so the white car should just ease up and go behind...�
maybe the white car should ease up and go behind the cam car...�
�
signal does not mean the cam car has to let him in... and it was clear that the cam car was not letting him in, so the white car should just ease up and go behind...�
�
That why most of us also say white car not totally at fault la. But also not totally his fault. It is his reaction after the cam car decide to block him off that makes him partly wrong also. Both drivers ego very big. Cam car cannot let the white car in, white car cannot accept that cam car want to block him off.
Both cam car driver and VW driver not gracious lah... one dont want to give way one die die want to cut in.. since no bang bang no need to determine who is at fault...
That why most of us also say white car not totally at fault la. But also not totally his fault. It is his reaction after the cam car decide to block him off that makes him partly wrong also. Both drivers ego very big. Cam car cannot let the white car in, white car cannot accept that cam car want to block him off.
Cam car, by own admission want to block, want to inconvenience.
At worst white car caught out by road works and not signal long enough.
The blocked lane caused an unusual situation. The teeniest bit of accommodation from cam car is all that's needed.
And he could even feel good about being nice instead of feel angry about being blocked
Took another look at the video... seems like cam car high beamed the white car too... can see the bright headlights in the reflection of the cars after the cut in.�
There was road works right in the middle lane - white car saw it and wanted to filter left.
�
Cam car (like most Sg drivers) instinctively accelerate to close the gap, then lost out, moved to centre lane (to overtake white car of course) but kena blocked by the road works.� LLST move left again.
�
No one angel here.� Both can leave their cars at home, make the road emptier for us.
Let's cut the turtle some slack
He msg me and is really apologetic and he knows he was I wrong
Let's not assassinate la... Turtles are in extinct list haaaa
Thks all
Ok folks
Let's cut the turtle some slack
He msg me and is really apologetic and he knows he was I wrong
Let's not assassinate la... Turtles are in extinct list haaaa
Thks all
if he wants to declare then be prepared to face different opinions. Same goes to the site he uploded either bey chia lor or other reckless driver site.
Man should live like a man with big heart. Leave the petty part in this world to the...ahem...
flame suit is on.
Not just driving to camp, I ever had 2 instances as a vehicle commander where my drivers almost fall asleep while driving. One was driving a 3 tonner and I had to shake his shoulder to keep him awake. The other time was in despatch car where I had to hold on to the steering when last minute I noticed the driver falling asleep and the vehicle was not keeping in lane. This one more dangerous coz we were on expressway.�
�
�
I also had related experience but i was the driver in NS instead.
Normally i was vehicle commander in our M113. In the middle of one exercise in Wallaby, for some reason my driver was not feeling well, and so only me and my sec 2i/c had to decide betw us who to drive (as the rest of the section troopers don't have license).
And cos he wasn't so confident, asked me to drive.
�
(btw, i should mention that the we the NCOs had driving license, but it was for training purpose only, which is unlike the vocational drivers whose license was a full license and could also drive during convoy on main roads, etc.)
�
Anyway, since we didn't wanna get stuck in the wilderness and didn't want to wait for replacement driver, i took over. And it was after some mission (when i led the section went flanking), so it was damned tiring. And unlike SGP where m113 moved 5 min in Area D will reach destination, Wallaby travelling time is easily 5-10 times longer as area much bigger.
�
So at one point, with all the dust flying at my face after driving for a long distance, it was so tiring that i almost fell asleep. My 2 i/c had to shout loudly through the intercom to 'wake' me up to avoid having to do overturn drill !!!
�
Almost 2 decades on and still feel fortunate that nothing disastrous happened....
Ok folks
Let's cut the turtle some slack
He msg me and is really apologetic and he knows he was I wrong
Let's not assassinate la... Turtles are in extinct list haaaa
Thks all�
Turtle tio jiak liao. Obliterated. On the road and on the forum.. until you show up�
I also had related experience but i was the driver in NS instead.
Normally i was vehicle commander in our M113. In the middle of one exercise in Wallaby, for some reason my driver was not feeling well, and so only me and my sec 2i/c had to decide betw us who to drive (as the rest of the section troopers don't have license).
And cos he wasn't so confident, asked me to drive.
(btw, i should mention that the we the NCOs had driving license, but it was for training purpose only, which is unlike the vocational drivers whose license was a full license and could also drive during convoy on main roads, etc.)
Anyway, since we didn't wanna get stuck in the wilderness and didn't want to wait for replacement driver, i took over. And it was after some mission (when i led the section went flanking), so it was damned tiring. And unlike SGP where m113 moved 5 min in Area D will reach destination, Wallaby travelling time is easily 5-10 times longer as area much bigger.
So at one point, with all the dust flying at my face after driving for a long distance, it was so tiring that i almost fell asleep. My 2 i/c had to shout loudly through the intercom to 'wake' me up to avoid having to do overturn drill !!!
Almost 2 decades on and still feel fortunate that nothing disastrous happened....
Only 18 yo young man can tahan this type of siong
Bro i feel you. I am full lic m113 driver. Yes did straight 16 hours drives in wallaby n crescendo (thailand).
Only 18 yo young man can tahan this type of siong�
wah, ha ha ... tks...
�
yah lah. in Area D, you all (drivers) always got to coma after driving 5 min, as reached destination and the troops had to go flanking for 2 hr...
�
then in wallaby (more siong than crescendo), land so big, can drive 2 hr then hit destination. during that time, the troops all hid behind coma...�
�
that time i already almost 30, bit buay tahan liao...�
actually if turtle is the cam car, he doesnt have to spell out when he post the video if he wants to see the respond from the forum, and probably learn something from it.
if he wants to declare then be prepared to face different opinions. Same goes to the site he uploded either bey chia lor or other reckless driver site.
True and like we say, agree to disagree
Ok all turtle saving exercise over
Get back to turtle sup haaaaa
Turtle tio jiak liao. Obliterated. On the road and on the forum.. until you show up
7 mth Liao so I let them live haaaa
I'm
The turtleminator lol
Tks bro. Think sometimes we shd be more mindful of our own selves. It's a learning journey
True and like we say, agree to disagree
Ok all turtle saving exercise over
Get back to turtle sup haaaaa
7 mth Liao so I let them live haaaa
I'm
The turtleminator lol
Tks bro. Think sometimes we shd be more mindful of our own selves. It's a learning journey�
Actually we all also not saints lah. We make mistakes. Very normal one. Just learn from it.�
�
And forums very harsh place lah. The judgement we pass here, tiagong more harsh than Supreme Court.
actually if turtle is the cam car, he doesnt have to spell out when he post the video if he wants to see the respond from the forum, and probably learn something from it.
if he wants to declare then be prepared to face different opinions. Same goes to the site he uploded either bey chia lor or other reckless driver site.
Same thing I tell my son as I whack his backside LOL
????????????
Edited by Jellandross, 02 August 2016 - 07:29 PM.
Actually we all also not saints lah. We make mistakes. Very normal one. Just learn from it.
And forums very harsh place lah. The judgement we pass here, tiagong more harsh than Supreme Court.
Now hv wildlife conservation too haaaaaaa a
It's ok bro turtlebroth like all say, we here to learn
Do continue to participate la
I also had related experience but i was the driver in NS instead.
Normally i was vehicle commander in our M113. In the middle of one exercise in Wallaby, for some reason my driver was not feeling well, and so only me and my sec 2i/c had to decide betw us who to drive (as the rest of the section troopers don't have license).
And cos he wasn't so confident, asked me to drive.
(btw, i should mention that the we the NCOs had driving license, but it was for training purpose only, which is unlike the vocational drivers whose license was a full license and could also drive during convoy on main roads, etc.)
Anyway, since we didn't wanna get stuck in the wilderness and didn't want to wait for replacement driver, i took over. And it was after some mission (when i led the section went flanking), so it was damned tiring. And unlike SGP where m113 moved 5 min in Area D will reach destination, Wallaby travelling time is easily 5-10 times longer as area much bigger.
So at one point, with all the dust flying at my face after driving for a long distance, it was so tiring that i almost fell asleep. My 2 i/c had to shout loudly through the intercom to 'wake' me up to avoid having to do overturn drill !!!
Almost 2 decades on and still feel fortunate that nothing disastrous happened....That's why I very scared of bikes riding near me. Better siam far far.
Ownself cam also hard to proof innocence with bikes. Lucky got 3rd party evidence in this case.
Obviously not the Mercedes fault in braking to avoid colliding van at the front, it's the motorcyclist slip into unbalanced and fall all by his own after passing the Mercedes.
Opens Mercedes driver door to blame the driver for braking that caused his fall and sat down again to show he's hurt is about compensation motive.
The Mercedes driver move his vehicle is a grave mistake in Traffic accident with someone suffered injury.
Edited by 2BDriver, 02 August 2016 - 08:59 PM.
Huat, tickle you with my previous experience from one of my monday 8pm. MPS.
My MP was LTY and he'd seen me thrice to cancel one TP summon of "Fail to Signal Turning" into TPY Lor 6.
LTY: Mr.F..., you had committed a traffic offence ! You know ?
Me: Mr.LTY, my signal lighting system was broken down and on the same day of the offence, I did repaired in AD WS.
LTY: Okay. I am writing to TP for appeal on your behalf, you await for their reply.
NEXT MPS IN ONE WEEK LATER.
LTY: They had replied but not in your favour, can you prove your car signal lights system was faulty on the day of traffic offence ?
Me: Yes Sir, my AD WS invoice shown the repaired items clearly with date and time.
LTY: That's helpful ! Let me have it duplicate and attach to them for "re-appealing" again, you don't pay the fine first and await for their reply.
NEXT MPS IN THE SECOND WEEK MPS.
LTY: Mr.F..., congratulation ! You've been pardon and excused this time with final warning, no more similar type of traffic offence again ! okay ?
Me: Thank you, sir. I will be warning my AD WS as what you had told me "Final Warning with no similar fault"
LTY: Okay lah....I meant you don't abuse the traffic regulation system, we are just doing our very best to help you.
Me: Yes sir, I hope no more "next time" again.
LTY: Hahahaha............ Bye Bye
Edited by Yewheng, 02 August 2016 - 09:01 PM.
This one reasonable what.. You got evidence to show that your car light signal indeed faulty at that time of offence..
TP isn't interested to accept "Any Faulty" excuses, he said it is my responsibility to make sure car conditions are in good order.
Took his summon and expressed my apology than quickly drive straight to AD WS to check the lighting circuit problems.
Why cannot? You know what is beh chia lor?
�
Where is beh Chia lor NOW?
Where is beh Chia lor NOW?
? ? ? ? ? ? �
�
Four Horses Road Guan Yin Temple �
Edited by 2BDriver, 02 August 2016 - 09:19 PM.
Edited by Mustank, 02 August 2016 - 09:33 PM.
No worries. I am not offended by any post here. Like I've said multiple times since this afternoon, i admit i got fault. But that volkswagen chap really shouldn't just cut in like that.
Didn't know by uploading a video i make all senior members here started a war on whose right or wrong so i decided to ask you to delete the post. Learnt my lesson, will continue to share if got interesting videos. BUT will never admit i am the cam car liao. Hahaha!Haha
�
You make all the old bastiches argue amongst themselves like worse than old men in a barber shop!
�
Next tell us you own turtle soup shop and I come eat!
? ? ? ? ? ? �
�
Four Horses Road Guan Yin Temple �
�
? ? ?
got horse carriage meh nowadays?
TP isn't interested to accept "Any Faulty" excuses, he said it is my responsibility to make sure car conditions are in good order.
Took his summon and expressed my apology than quickly drive straight to AD WS to check the lighting circuit problems.
�
If like that, i sure complain 1.
�
Dear sirs,
I had checked my car before i drove out of MSCP that morning. �I found my signal light to be faulty. �So, i drove down to AD immediately, On my way, i was stopped by your officer xxx. �I had explained to him that i am on my way to AD now. �Unfortunately, your officer xxx said it is my responsibilty and he issued me a summon immediately.
�
I would like to seek your clarification on this matter. �Does it mean that i have to call a tow truck to tow my car to fix faulty signal light? �If not, what would be the best avenue to fix a faulty signal light?�
It happened just outside De La Salle School along Choa Chu Kang St.52
But I have difficulty loading the fileAttached Files
�trim.460DF812-64EB-44B7-AE5A-C839A0F067A8.MOV ��1.13MB ��198 downloads
Edited by BanCoe, 02 August 2016 - 10:14 PM.
another motorcycle accident.... stupid taxi
That's why I very scared of bikes riding near me. Better siam far far.
Ownself cam also hard to proof innocence with bikes. Lucky got 3rd party evidence in this case.
Cannot believe it --Narrow escape from death!!
It happened just outside De La Salle School along Choa Chu Kang St.52
But I have difficulty loading the fileWah lan eh ! �
Drive until like that
��the malay man and the girl pedestrians �
try walking for 3 solid days.....sleep (if you can) during day time with little vegetation for shelter. You will swear never to swear again....���
Pai miah...
? ? ?
got horse carriage meh nowadays?
Singapore zoo horse carriage ride. Go and try, very fun especially when the horseman gets the horse on fast trotting. Klik klock klik klock . . .
Biker ownself banged still wanted to kpkb. Huh .... shouldn't accident vehicle involving injury cannot move until TP arrives and site investigation completed?
Trying to con that driver and make a fast buck?
Where is beh Chia lor NOW?
Every road if you are Hokkien? Heh heh!
Embedded.
�
Just a normal straight road. Except for suicide, I can't think of another possibility of crashing a car like this.
�
Oh wait.. there's idiocy too.
�
There should be some similarity in above and below car crashes with silly mistakes by not holding the steering wheel firmly tight in high speeds.
Road debris, pot hole and winds impacts would cause the steering tie rod to sway the car out of straight line that lead to drifting and spinning out of control.
Edited by 2BDriver, 03 August 2016 - 08:07 AM.
Alot of the taxi lau their night vision is terok one...add on night time headlamp/streetlight glare, the singular motorcycle headlight might have blended in with the car that was further behind him.
�
So the Taxi lau probably thought he can make the turn avoiding the car but did not see the motorcycle that was infront and travelling much faster.
�
�
another�motorcycle accident.... stupid taxi
�
�
sianz....missed the ownself-pawn-ownself block buster of the month here.... cannot even see the veedio liao
�
Can only read and infer
�
Ok folks
Let's cut the turtle some slack
He msg me and is really apologetic and he knows he was I wrong
Let's not assassinate la... Turtles are in extinct list haaaa
Thks all�
to be on a fair note, it is definitely not intentional but the vision of these "veteran" taxi lao might not be as good as they want them to be. Astigmatism could have hinter their sight.
sianz....missed the ownself-pawn-ownself block buster of the month here.... cannot even see the veedio liao
�
Can only read and infer
�
forever cum late lo...hahaha
Agree with you. We Singaporeans are too used to the system whereby if the government never say can do, means cannot do.
We cannot be depended upon to make our own judgement when negotiating unsignalized junctions.
�
So many accidents involving right turns, either with pedestrian, motorcycles or cars going straight. LTA should seriously think of changing to controlled junctions for all vehicles.
�
No worries. I am not offended by any post here. Like I've said multiple times since this afternoon, i admit i got fault. But that volkswagen chap really shouldn't just cut in like that.
Didn't know by uploading a video i make all senior members here started a war on whose right or wrong so i decided to ask you to delete the post. Learnt my lesson, will continue to share if got interesting videos. BUT will never admit i am the cam car liao. Hahaha!�
I didn't see the video, but I can guess what happens.
�
If there's obstruction on one lane, and the vehicle is going fast, you can bet he'll try to filter in, whether he can make it or not.
For such cases, live and let live. Slow down and let them in, whether you're right or wrong.
�
And take it easy. Otherwise, your blood will boil everytime. Not good for health.
sianz....missed the ownself-pawn-ownself block buster of the month here.... cannot even see the veedio liao
�
Can only read and infer
Bro V, no worries be happy, MCF already infested with many self pawn self buddies, there are plenty of them lurks around.
Sometime, somewhere and somehow, when you are least expected someone will post video and says.....
Edited by 2BDriver, 03 August 2016 - 08:57 AM.
�
saw on reddit just now ... geez ><
Actually, it is an offense to drive a car with lighting fault lor,� according to highway code and educational video after you pass your layson.
�
Driver should PRE CHECK car everytime before driving the vehicle.
�
Is crazy,for me I check lighting every 2 week in the morning.
�
Anyway, my Carens signal turn lighting will blink very fast if one of the bulb is OC.
�
�
�
It is very dangerous to you and other road users if your lighting is faulty lor.� Especially with so many keeping car beyond 10 years hor.� I see quite a number of cars with totally FAILED brake light these days.� Imagine the driver drive on the expressway at 110km/h and no brake light.
�
�
�
�
�
�
This one reasonable what.. You got evidence to show that your car light signal indeed faulty at that time of offence..
�
I only think it is time to do a major revision to the Highway Code lor..... cheaper.� For example, for us, when we approached an uncontrolled junction, we only need to give way to the right ?? Left.
�
In US, when you approached an uncontrolled junction is first come first to go.� How ?
After a few time being horned, if you reached the junction and see 2 cars, then you can move off after the 2 cars have completed lor. Include full access of right turn, left turn or go straight lor
�
And patience ..... ya .....
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Agree with you. We Singaporeans are too used to the system whereby if the government never say can do, means cannot do.
We cannot be depended upon to make our own judgement when negotiating unsignalized junctions.
�
�
saw on reddit just now ... geez ><
The Citroen missed by 6 inches
I only think it is time to do a major revision to the Highway Code lor..... cheaper. For example, for us, when we approached an uncontrolled junction, we only need to give way to the right ?? Left.
In US, when you approached an uncontrolled junction is first come first to go. How ?
After a few time being horned, if you reached the junction and see 2 cars, then you can move off after the 2 cars have completed lor. Include full access of right turn, left turn or go straight lor
And patience ..... ya .....
truck cannot hit that citroen!!!!!
�
is that a C6? It is rare!!!!!
saw on reddit just now ... geez ><
Woohooooooo!!!!!
�
saw on reddit just now ... geez ><
�
Nowadays a lot lorry driver are very reckless.
�
Lucky no one was injured.
Seems to be driving quite fast at a school zone, this kind should not drive
http://www.tnp.sg/ne...banned-20-years
�
Seriously WTF sia the sentencing !!!
Already on banned and drive with comsumption of alcohol, this kind should get max penalty.�
�
Really speechless how lenient SG traffic laws are and how long it have not be reviewed. Our traffic laws seriously need to change.
Edited by WoeiSongKeh, 03 August 2016 - 11:35 AM.
That pacik reaction is so slooooooow that he seem to be aware of how luck he was only after the car flew pass him and crashed.....
on the other hand the young companion seem to have started running pretty early....
�
�
Wow, after 14 weeks, can start driving again.� Hey, why should I need a license when everybody can drive without a license.
�
�
�
�
�
http://www.tnp.sg/ne...banned-20-years
�
Seriously WTF sia the sentencing !!!
Already on banned and drive with comsumption of alcohol, this kind should get max penalty.�
�
Really speechless how lenient SG traffic laws are and how long it have not be reviewed. Our traffic laws seriously need to change.
�
That pacik reaction is so slooooooow that he seem to be aware of how luck he was only after the car flew pass him and crashed.....
on the other hand the young companion seem to have started running pretty early....
Nowadays a lot lorry driver are very reckless.
Lucky no one was injured.
Seems to be driving quite fast at a school zone, this kind should not drive
Should play with crazy train song
http://www.tnp.sg/ne...banned-20-years
Seriously WTF sia the sentencing !!!
Already on banned and drive with comsumption of alcohol, this kind should get max penalty.
Really speechless how lenient SG traffic laws are and how long it have not be reviewed. Our traffic laws seriously need to change.
this one not reckless... just an idiot, bully ....�
this one not reckless... just an idiot, bully ....
Nothing will happen just like Adrain case
�
ya, send this video to stomp, hardwarezione... so whole sg know this idiot
truck cannot hit that citroen!!!!!
�
is that a C6? It is rare!!!!!
�
Yes, it is a C6, very rare indeed
this one not reckless... just an idiot, bully ....�
�
Nowadays way too many childish behaviour from drivers. But its true whampoa market carparks always a lot of this kind of cases. I know coz I go there to eat very often. Usually I will try the one nearest to the hawker centre first, then the above video carpark. If I cant find a lot over at the stated carpark in the video I will drive to empty field that side. More lots over there.�
this one not reckless... just an idiot, bully ....�
�
Look like the same person to me.
Seriously doing this kind of thing really cb kia, hope he get his karma�
Nowadays way too many childish behaviour from drivers. But its true whampoa market carparks always a lot of this kind of cases. I know coz I go there to eat very often. Usually I will try the one nearest to the hawker centre first, then the above video carpark. If I cant find a lot over at the stated carpark in the video I will drive to empty field that side. More lots over there.�
�
I don't even bother to wait. Lol. Just drive straight to the biggest carpark there. Sure got lot. Walk back and start eating already and I still see the same people waiting for a lot.
Look like the same person to me.
Seriously doing this kind of thing really cb kia, hope he get his karma
Nobody want to scratch one lah
Truck crash compilation
Should play with crazy train song
�This is what you like and the real meaning of powerful �
Edited by 2BDriver, 03 August 2016 - 11:51 PM.
This of kind of thing happened because
�
a) Cam car did not indicate he/she is waiting for THE slot - most likely she or ah pek
b) Cam car on the "wrong" side - most likely she again or ah pek.
�
And Vandalism is a penal offence lor, very serious.
�
And again no proof.
�
�
For me, I also angry one, sound horn before he move lor, if no response, what to do, it already happened, let move on.
�
My colleague got a BIG F on the bonnet (she), while my HR manager (she) the car got a scratch AROUND her car.
�
�
As for me, I also took a slot, the other party quick reverse to my car and demand an explanation. My explanation was, you are 6~7 slots away and on the opposite side. So ...... you still want the slot ? The driver angrily drove off lor
�
I really don't mind driving out again, after all it is only a car park slot .......
�
�
�
this one not reckless... just an idiot, bully ....�
�
Vandalism is a criminal offence if State Properties are involved. If its between two chaps, the police will ask u to settle yourself. And pls dont think that this chap will be jailed or fined etc. Its not going to happen because there is no witnesses or video evidence indicating the criminal act. One top criminal lawyer who has since went to heaven last year told me personally when i ask him about this kind of cases.
�
between both private parties likely to be mischief instead.�
This of kind of thing happened because
a) Cam car did not indicate he/she is waiting for THE slot - most likely she or ah pek
b) Cam car on the "wrong" side - most likely she again or ah pek.
And Vandalism is a penal offence lor, very serious.
And again no proof.
For me, I also angry one, sound horn before he move lor, if no response, what to do, it already happened, let move on.
My colleague got a BIG F on the bonnet (she), while my HR manager (she) the car got a scratch AROUND her car.
As for me, I also took a slot, the other party quick reverse to my car and demand an explanation. My explanation was, you are 6~7 slots away and on the opposite side. So ...... you still want the slot ? The driver angrily drove off lor
I really don't mind driving out again, after all it is only a car park slot .......
Yah true. It's just a parking lot.
This is what you like and the real meaning of powerful
That one most probable got lots
From the report, seemed like a LL driver ignoring everything and played with fire then LL kenna played back by fire. Both parties have to be considerate.Attached Thumbnails
go whampoa eat, consperm is park the furthest lot one
That one most probable got lots
I always go Whampoa market eat or tabao. I will go at non-peak, sure got lots of lots one.
�
4.30pm I go eat or tabao dinner liao. Sure have lots, no need to wait. Cos nobody eats dinner at 4.30pm.
Struck lottery big time and gave his car as offering hor.
From the report, seemed like a LL driver ignoring everything and played with fire then LL kenna played back by fire. Both parties have to be considerate.
This type how to claim ah?
�
This type claim ownself lor ~�
This type how to claim ah?
�
claim from the other side ?
http://www.tnp.sg/ne...banned-20-years
�
Seriously WTF sia the sentencing !!!
Already on banned and drive with comsumption of alcohol, this kind should get max penalty.�
�
Really speechless how lenient SG traffic laws are and how long it have not be reviewed. Our traffic laws seriously need to change.
�
�
I really don understand the sentence...
�
"ban 20 years for driving"... this bugger already still carry on driving while serving his driving ban period... so what even if the judge ban him 100 years... make no different to him... he will still drive...
�
14 weeks is too lenient... the victim suffered so much... �
�
In sillypore... the best way to murder someone is to drink and drive then hit to kill... even best if the murderer drive lexus... �
I always go Whampoa market eat or tabao. I will go at non-peak, sure got lots of lots one.
�
4.30pm I go eat or tabao dinner liao. Sure have lots, no need to wait. Cos nobody eats dinner at 4.30pm.
�
I also do that. Go there early but the crowd comes. Park at the other big car park and just walk a few more steps. I hate to look for parking lots during perk hours. So stressful. Rather eat early and let the body have time to digest the dinner before going to bed
I usually park at Whampoa Spring HDB and just take a leisurely stroll to the hawker.
�
�
Thank you leh! I usually avoid that place because of parking woes in the area. Thanks you the idea.
Remember this case?
�
http://news.asiaone....-serangoon-road
�
�
�
The first car, toyota wish belongs to my fren. Spoke to him yesterday. In the end, company boss unable to pay for all cars damage. The ah neh driver was drink driving so he has to do self-claim on his own insurance. Total repair cost is $12k. COE left one year. His NCD not affected, he told me that insurance company will be suing the company for the claim.
Vandalism is a criminal offence if State Properties are involved. If its between two chaps, the police will ask u to settle yourself. And pls dont think that this chap will be jailed or fined etc. Its not going to happen because there is no witnesses or video evidence indicating the criminal act. One top criminal lawyer who has since went to heaven last year told me personally when i ask him about this kind of cases.
�
If this considered as between two parties, as no state properties involved, so police will say settle ownself. Then can beat the shxt of out that guy, and say it's between two parties (no state properties), police no need to get involved too�
�
Btw, someone here had evidence of an idiot scratching his car and police didn't do anything...
I really don understand the sentence...
"ban 20 years for driving"... this bugger already still carry on driving while serving his driving ban period... so what even if the judge ban him 100 years... make no different to him... he will still drive...
14 weeks is too lenient... the victim suffered so much...
In sillypore... the best way to murder someone is to drink and drive then hit to kill... even best if the murderer drive lexus...
Basically mean... The law is applicable only to those who need/want to abide to it.
Edited by Joseph22, 04 August 2016 - 02:14 PM.
Thank you leh! I usually avoid that place because of parking woes in the area. Thanks you the idea.
�
oops...maybe I shouldn't hab post that
I usually park at Whampoa Spring HDB and just take a leisurely stroll to the hawker.
�
I park there too if I am going to the hawker at lunch time peak hour. But I seldom go there at that point of time�
http://statutes.agc....e Depth:0;rec=0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Vandalism is a criminal offence if State Properties are involved. If its between two chaps, the police will ask u to settle yourself. And pls dont think that this chap will be jailed or fined etc. Its not going to happen because there is no witnesses or video evidence indicating the criminal act. One top criminal lawyer who has since went to heaven last year told me personally when i ask him about this kind of cases.
�
If this considered as between two parties, as no state properties involved, so police will say settle ownself. Then can beat the shxt of out that guy, and say it's between two parties (no state properties), police no need to get involved too�
�
Btw, someone here had evidence of an idiot scratching his car and police didn't do anything...
�
Yah. Wonder how is he now? Flying drone I guess?�
I park there too if I am going to the hawker at lunch time peak hour. But I seldom go there at that point of time�
�
That means very often izit?
�
maybe we should start a Alternative Parking Kangtaos thread!
That means very often izit?
�
maybe we should start a Alternative Parking Kangtaos thread!
�
Definitely at least 2 times per week�
�
Maybe we should because some places parking really have problems. Thats why sometimes I tell myself dont go these places during peak, especially when the places I like to go are hawker centres.�
�
Thanks for showing to us that SPF is sleeping on the job again.
Definitely at least 2 times per week�
�
Maybe we should because some places parking really have problems. Thats why sometimes I tell myself dont go these places during peak, especially when the places I like to go are hawker centres.�
�
�
you're a good husband
�
Seriously, before we are OT further, if we want to park at�hotspots, we must be prepared for such shenanigans.
�
If a buay zi dong driver take�another�driver's�perceived�"rightful" lot, what can one do?� I dunno.....may get out of the car and hantam the fella meh??� Mai la....eben though I probably would�mentally doing dat to the fella�
In other countries, ppl already mano o mano.
�
Here, ppl juz hide behind the law to flame others.� The worst are those who take camera out.
Definitely at least 2 times per week
Maybe we should because some places parking really have problems. Thats why sometimes I tell myself dont go these places during peak, especially when the places I like to go are hawker centres.That means very often izit?
�
maybe we should start a Alternative Parking Kangtaos thread!
�
ok ... but please remember to SEARCH before creating new thread ...
�
ok ... but please remember to SEARCH before creating new thread ...
ok ... but please remember to SEARCH before creating new thread ...
�
�
He always say final warning��
Maybe deliberately burned own car then bet 4D on car plate number - claim SG Pool lor ... hehe ... ���
eh....i was the honda civic lar.....i wanted to pee.....so got to drive fast!)))
�
got kui bee tec??
Obviously not the Mercedes fault in braking to avoid colliding van at the front, it's the motorcyclist slip into unbalanced and fall all by his own after passing the Mercedes.
Opens Mercedes driver door to blame the driver for braking that caused his fall and sat down again to show he's hurt is about compensation motive.
The Mercedes driver move his vehicle is a grave mistake in Traffic accident with someone suffered injury.
�
cannot say mistake because merc was not involved in the accident at all.
�
its like boh dai boh ji somebody fall down beside u becomes your fault??
![[hur]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uys6JwxPl0oajOXAcZQwJ_0mVm-E8F27BHtLac0KUK80cXyRDUldPEi1vi-13QBD1D0pAtS0p9GEAa7LnooM2ASnW4QLnveFnvhRQKkAM75RCI8wdsEpbxGjQSQwPEqTwkfg=s0-d)
This evening I have got my car to go for the annual car horn inspection. �Long time never horn, I afraid insects will get into the horn.
�
Tested Passed. �Dual Tone is working.
�
Remember, always use original horn recommended by your car manufacturer.
�
Don't be like my friend went to a motorbike shop to buy horn for his car. �Doesn't mean same size same power.
�
Now his car sound like not a motorcycle but a Ice Cream Van ......
�
Car horn one low tone, one high tone and it sound like PORE MORE read together.
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
She ask for it lor ....... 50/50, Driver loss NCD and she can only claim half or less of the losses.�
�
It is the Hungry Ghost Festival month lor, my friend say really can see more during these month. �He can see dead people.
�
�
�
�
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
�
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
�
This one is really never keep a proper look out already la. The lady in that lane for quite a while already but the driver still never slow down. Must be dreaming.
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
CB Jaywalker
Dont even bother to turn her head to see right side before crossing
KNN...deserve it.
Like tat all lose lor.
Dangerous combination
Timely reminder to all divers to be alert at all times!!!!
Pug also a lady driver.
Dangerous combination
Timely reminder to all divers to be alert at all times!!!!�
Once Pokemon Go hits Singapore.......drivers please be extra alert!
The pug driver probably siam to the right after seeing the jay walker, but jay walker die die must move faster to try her best to get into the path of the car instead of stopping first....
�
Woman plus woman, deadly combination!
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
�
Thinks that's a male driver.
Lady in yellow came out from the rear, then a male (in white) came out and went back to the driver's seat.
Anyway, whatever it is, driver is at fault with the traffic law here...
Even though the jay walker is the one asking for it by not looking out.
Hope insurance don't payout to the 'victim', since it really looks like she is asking for it...
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
Edited by Jellandross, 05 August 2016 - 01:01 AM.
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
�
I wonder where did the car�come from? Either from junction turn�or behind the camera car switching lane?? Jaywalker did look out for cars, but took it for granted assuming the scenario will�remain the same when she approach lane 1. But alas, it was not to be.
got kui bee tec??
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
I wonder where did the car�come from? Either from junction turn�or behind the camera car switching lane?? Jaywalker did look out for cars, but took it for granted assuming the scenario will�remain the same when she approach lane 1. But alas, it was not to be.
�
There's no junction here, this is a straight road from TPE exit / Sengkang Hospital �into Punggol. A downslope and vehicles tend to travel fast at this stretch.�
CB Jaywalker
Dont even bother to turn her head to see right side before crossing
KNN...deserve it.
well, consolation is hospital nearby but ccb the jayalker. �Lady driver oso, so no sympathy lah hahahaha
Got SK Hospital ??
�
When ?� New one ah ?
�
�
�
�
There's no junction here, this is a straight road from TPE exit / Sengkang Hospital �into Punggol. A downslope and vehicles tend to travel fast at this stretch.�
�
Got SK Hospital ??
When ? New one ah ?
Thinks that's a male driver.
Lady in yellow came out from the rear, then a male (in white) came out and went back to the driver's seat.
Anyway, whatever it is, driver is at fault with the traffic law here...
Even though the jay walker is the one asking for it by not looking out.
Hope insurance don't payout to the 'victim', since it really looks like she is asking for it...
�
Ya. It was a guy driver.
IMH nearby right?
Thinks that's a male driver.
Lady in yellow came out from the rear, then a male (in white) came out and went back to the driver's seat.
Anyway, whatever it is, driver is at fault with the traffic law here...
Even though the jay walker is the one asking for it by not looking out.
Hope insurance don't payout to the 'victim', since it really looks like she is asking for it...
�
Deleted. Duplicate
Edited by Fireball0088, 05 August 2016 - 09:34 AM.
both jaywalker and driver not looking, driver probably realize that last minute but can't stop in time.
Can the driver's view be blocked by the vehicle that recorded the footage? Especially so if the said vehicle is a tall one? It's so unfortunate.
Oh ...... then mostly like she is not send there ...... as she is going to "wait until die" .... Cause of Death : Die by Waiting .... hahaaaa
�
And hope the driver got valid driving licence, insurance and road tax.� If not, she better have the Khaw Super 8 Card lor ...
�
Then MC on National Day ....... wasted.
�
�
�
Still under construction lah. Go there receive treatment from Bangla izit LOL
�
�
Can the driver's view be blocked by the vehicle that recorded the footage? Especially so if the said vehicle is a tall one? It's so unfortunate.
�
There might b a possibility that the A pillar of the car block the driver's view totally. For this only driver will know, cos it happened to me b4. But Heng ah~ Guan Yin Ma po pi
�I wasn't in the fast mode and able to brake in time.�
�
This case, driver will need to bear the liability but on the bright side it's not 100% any more.. Recent years, law finally open their eyes to see that it's not always the driver's fault
��
Jay walk at least look right for oncoming traffic la.
Like tat all lose lor.�
I realized alot of ppl don't do that.. CCB.. school never teach or something.. Jay walk but their CB eyes look the other direction.. Pssst~ Sunday, Serangoon road many many
�in fact no need sunday.. it's everyday
It's sad but reality.�Often, it depends on the state of mind and how much attention one is�paying on the roads, be it operating a motor vehicle or walking.�Sometimes the mind just wanders off or one may be using a mobile device, engaging in a conversation, work fatigue, tiredness, etc. So guys, please be mindful on the roads and�often remind and remind your loved ones,�observe�safety.�
There might b a possibility that the A pillar of the car block the driver's view totally. For this only driver will know, cos it happened to me b4. But Heng ah~ Guan Yin Ma po pi
�
This case, driver will need to bear the liability but on the bright side it's not 100% any more.. Recent years, law finally open their eyes to see that it's not always the driver's fault
�
I realized alot of ppl don't do that.. CCB.. school never teach or something.. Jay walk but their CB eyes look the other direction.. Pssst~ Sunday, Serangoon road many many
�
Serangoon rd, Jalan Besar, Race Course rd and any small roads in between�
There might b a possibility that the A pillar of the car block the driver's view totally. For this only driver will know, cos it happened to me b4. But Heng ah~ Guan Yin Ma po pi
This case, driver will need to bear the liability but on the bright side it's not 100% any more.. Recent years, law finally open their eyes to see that it's not always the driver's fault
I realized alot of ppl don't do that.. CCB.. school never teach or something.. Jay walk but their CB eyes look the other direction.. Pssst~ Sunday, Serangoon road many many
Look like the same person to me.
Seriously doing this kind of thing really cb kia, hope he get his karma�
�
arm with this knowledge that there is nothing you can do about it.
�
Would you insist on your right to the parking lot the next time you are confronted with a bully ?
�
We keep saying gracious society.�
So give and take ...
�
We keep saying no one owes us a living
So we become more aggressive in our interpretation of protecting our "rights" and fight for ourselves
�
But what are we really saying when it comes to 50 years of well meaning intend to have justice and equality only to have our belief that Singapore is run by law and order�
�
Now its more like IF you know the law and flirt with the fact that you will not get caught,
�
Its almost as good as some hooligan in the market cutting queue and taking up what you have invested time in.
A piece of parking lot so that you can proceed to do what you do best. Continue with life and have lunch.
�
in principal is what you had being discipline in and culturally brought up to believe that following the rules is what makes this place a better wholesome environment that you call home.
�
Instead, its more like every man for himself. If you dont like what I do, then its your prerogative..tough luck.
�
For a while when the Kim jong il honda civic episode occurs, it looks like
�
Unified as a whole, what anyone should do is to do what we do best.
Stand up to a bully and no one should be subjected to such a treatment of being harasses.
�
Now it would seem like
�
catch me if you have time and money..
in the meanwhile, haha to your scratch car...
�
Only time will tell if this person would be subjected to social media CSI and have a KIm Jong Li moment�
�
Or
Its just two boys being boys.. ego bruise and life goes on...
CB Jaywalker
Dont even bother to turn her head to see right side before crossing
KNN...deserve it.
Pruss huan
ouch, painful lesson. By the way, in my personal view only, I understand the black Toyota (think so) on the left trying to help. But kindly please whoever trying to help in the event, move your car to the side in order not to cause Long whole stretch traffic jam. Of coz appreciate those who helped out.
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
�
The car stopped at the third lane to 'help' is just as idiot as the jaywalker.
The more I look at it, the more I feel this is a 100% pedestrian fault.�
�
We often say drivers have to practice defensive driving. I say pedestrian also have to practice 'defensive-crossing'.
�
The pedestrian despite not looking in the direction of on-coming traffic clearly sense that there is a vehicle coming her away as she hasten her pace to complete the crossing. That was when a few steps into her hasten pace, she was knocked down.�
�
Since she has sensed an approaching vehicle, she should really have look up and judge for herself. If she stop in her track after sensing an approaching vehicle, she would have save herself for this accident.
�
I have comes across many pedestrians, stop to look-out for vehicle, see an approaching vehicle, continue to dash out to try to beat the traffic and complete their crossing. I am really curious what is going through their mind. What is the point of stopping and check for traffic, see an approaching vehicle and still dash out. I wonder why it does not occur to these pedestrians why they are never going to beat a fast moving vehicle. If they wanna cross like that, they might as well cross without looking. I really don't see a difference.�
Edited by Gizmore, 05 August 2016 - 01:30 PM.
There's no junction here, this is a straight road from TPE exit / Sengkang Hospital �into Punggol. A downslope and vehicles tend to travel fast at this stretch.�
�
Oh, so the location is near SK hospital?� No wonder I find the location familiar.
�
Hope we have something here to regulate lanesplitting too!
California Assembly Unanimously Passes Bill To Regulate LanesplittingA bill authorizing the California Highway Patrol to set hard guidelines for �lane splitting,� motorcycles making way between lanes of traffic, passed through the state assembly with a 69-0 vote. Once Governor Jerry Brown signs it, which is expected, CA will be the first state with formally legal lane splitting.
�
While never explicitly legal or illegal, California cops and motorcyclists have maintained a tacit understanding about lane splitting� it�s allowed, within reason. Putter through gridlocked cars and they won�t raise an eyebrow. Bash somebody�s side-mirror off at full noise and the cops might decide to come after you.
�
The bill supposedly started out specifying that a biker could split lanes �only when a motorcycle was moving no more than 15 miles per hour faster than the traffic around it, and it prohibited the practice at speeds above 50 mph�... ...
�
��
Another Sonata suspected SUA incident at inspection centre.
�
When is our LTA going to take further action such SUA? At least 3 cases has been reported here iirc, NOT serious enough? Must wait till someone get killed or seriously injuried? I am deeply concern.
The day will come when pedestrian will mount action camera on their head when crossing the road so that they can also record moments of impacts.
�
They can use the evidence to prove to court that she got check both left and right before crossing.
�
Of course, the court ruling shall be conducted in her hospital, or funeral party.
And there is a signalized junction /pedestrian crossing <20m ahead.....
�
Alot of times, these foolhardy jaywalkers are not drivers themselves.
�
So they have no inkling of the reaction timing, blindspots individual driver skills and attention-level......
�
�
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
�
SG is so safe that it gives a false sense of security as if accident can never happen to you. Some people have lost their survival instinct through the years and end up doing things that will endanger their own lives on a daily basis. I've always wondered how some jaywalkers and escooter riders can survive for so long on roads. I guess you can be safe for 20 years but it just take one little mistake on the 21st year to end it all.
Is that why we have big celebration for 21st birthday?
Is that why we have big celebration for 21st birthday?
because can vote mah?
but still dunno how to cross the road...
because can vote mah?
but still dunno how to cross the road...
21 year old can vote but dont know how to jay walk also complain.The driver definitely played a part in the accident.
�
The jaywalker already crossed to the middle of the lane and still got knocked down?
�
I say the driver was not paying attention at all until too late.
�
Yeah. The driver really not paying attention. No matter how big the cam car is, once the pedestrian reaches the white lane marking, should be visible to vehicles on lane 1 already. By the time the lady got hit, she was already halfway in lane 1. That is when the driver started braking only.
The driver definitely played a part in the accident.
�
The jaywalker already crossed to the middle of the lane and still got knocked down?
�
I say the driver was not paying attention at all until too late.
2 reasons why the pedestrian is at fault.
a) jaywalking
b) failed to look-out before crossing.
��� When we were young, we were taught to look right-left-right before crossing and continue to look-out while doing so.
�
Drivers attention is�not only in the front. Occasionally, he/she also have to�watch the rear and�sides...
How slow depends on how fast you can react and stop, if something appears out of lane 2.
�
Let say a bus stops at a traffic junction. It just so happens, it's also a bus stop and it's alighting passengers.
The traffic junction is green in your favour. Do you speed pass the bus on the right lane ?
�
Bcuz some passengers may appear in front of the bus and try to dash across.
And you can't see them.
�
Fair or not to you is immaterial, when you have hit somebody.
�
yes , so how slow can you go based on your reaction time ? How "fast" do you reckon the car was going ? The opposite of slow isn't necessary speeding.�
Looks like the TP very busy rushing somewhere else. Bo eng entertain the hogger but gave him a dagger stare before zooming off LOL.
The hogger didn't look like he understood that he was hogging. More like... Oh shit TP lai liao ka kin zam brakes slow down further. TP be like... KNN never give way still zam brake slow me down $&#!He even applied brakes when TP was at his butt!
Likely lost focus or bike skidded. Think injury quite serious, see right body red maybe blood. Hope not that serious.
Wrong judgement. He did not realise the van slowed down...
Another Sonata suspected SUA incident at inspection centre.
Edited by Mustank, 05 August 2016 - 08:25 PM.
Obviously not the Mercedes fault in braking to avoid colliding van at the front, it's the motorcyclist slip into unbalanced and fall all by his own after passing the Mercedes.
Opens Mercedes driver door to blame the driver for braking that caused his fall and sat down again to show he's hurt is about compensation motive.
The Mercedes driver move his vehicle is a grave mistake in Traffic accident with someone suffered injury.
Wah piang eh! This biker did not prepare to go home safely and yet got the cheek to confront the Merc driver!�
Edited by Mustank, 05 August 2016 - 08:25 PM.
Agreed. �It is pedestrian's parent fault. �Never properly teach which results in the accident.
�
And yes, at 18 years old your reflexes response take about 250ms. �Then it is down hill from there.
�
That why F1 driver need young lad. �
�
�
�
2 reasons why the pedestrian is at fault.
a) jaywalking
b) failed to look-out before crossing.
��� When we were young, we were taught to look right-left-right before crossing and continue to look-out while doing so.
�
Drivers attention is�not only in the front. Occasionally, he/she also have to�watch the rear and�sides...
�
And Inspection Centre also say Huat Ah !!!�
�
�
Ownself
�
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
�
bloody jaywalker, walk also dont bother to check the lane
the car probably see her only last minute.
�
that being said, the car was not speeding, else the jaywalker would have flown a distance away
We are responsible for our own safety on the roads first and foremost.
Walking across a road and looking the other way instead of in the direction of possible oncoming traffic is as stupid as it gets.
She might wreck her own life and also that of the driver of the car.
The speed of the car looks ok, think the driver couldnt stop in time by the time he saw her sudden dash across the road
The driver must be feeling terrible
Hope we have something here to regulate lanesplitting too!
California Assembly Unanimously Passes Bill To Regulate LanesplittingA bill authorizing the California Highway Patrol to set hard guidelines for �lane splitting,� motorcycles making way between lanes of traffic, passed through the state assembly with a 69-0 vote. Once Governor Jerry Brown signs it, which is expected, CA will be the first state with formally legal lane splitting.
�
While never explicitly legal or illegal, California cops and motorcyclists have maintained a tacit understanding about lane splitting� it�s allowed, within reason. Putter through gridlocked cars and they won�t raise an eyebrow. Bash somebody�s side-mirror off at full noise and the cops might decide to come after you.
�
The bill supposedly started out specifying that a biker could split lanes �only when a motorcycle was moving no more than 15 miles per hour faster than the traffic around it, and it prohibited the practice at speeds above 50 mph�... ...
�
��
�
When is our LTA going to take further action such SUA? At least 3 cases has been reported here iirc, NOT serious enough? Must wait till someone get killed or seriously injuried? I am deeply concern.
I remember already an old Lady got killed...early this year,if i not wrong,in Bedok...
Edited by ER-3682, 05 August 2016 - 09:51 PM.
For those who have car cameras, can confirm what I notice from my camera?� From the video, object may seem further away than it actually is viewed with own eyes?
For those who have car cameras, can confirm what I notice from my camera?� From the video, object may seem further away than it actually is viewed with own eyes?
�
Video view is not exactly the same as the real thing.
�
Your eyes move about when you're driving, it has a larger field of view. By comparison, the camera is fixed at a position.
�
Video speed appears to be faster (I think), than the real eye/brain perception.
yes , so how slow can you go based on your reaction time ? How "fast" do you reckon the car was going ? The opposite of slow isn't necessary speeding.�
�
Speeding is relative. If a 3 lane road is straight and wide with little traffic, you can safely do 90km/h.
But if the sign says 70km/h, you will be deemed speeding.
�
I can't judge how fast the car is going, so I'm not saying he's "speeding" or not.
�
If you think your reaction time is super quick, your car has one of those big brake kit and can stop on a dime, then you can do 50km/h or more. For most of us, in that kind of situation, you would be better off doing 20km/h.
For those who have car cameras, can confirm what I notice from my camera?� From the video, object may seem further away than it actually is viewed with own eyes?
�
Depends also on the field of view of your camera's lens. A lot of car cams use a wide-angle lens which makes things look smaller.
For those who have car cameras, can confirm what I notice from my camera?� From the video, object may seem further away than it actually is viewed with own eyes?
�
yes, from my experience with different cameras. Video footage always look�
�
1. further
2. faster�
Pokemon Go has landed on the dot, folks. We're going to have to be even more careful now with people focusing on their phones while walking the roads... or worse, drivers playing it on their phone holders.
Pokemon Go has landed on the dot, folks. We're going to have to be even more careful now with people focusing on their phones while walking the roads... or worse, drivers playing it on their phone holders.
Pokemon Go has landed on the dot, folks. We're going to have to be even more careful now with people focusing on their phones while walking the roads... or worse, drivers playing it on their phone holders.
�
Already seen drivers playing while driving. The phone in their phone holder so according to what TP just clarified, it is legal. I saw one guy who just on hazard light and pulled over just to catch a pokemon....
�
Infact, in the pokemon go facebook group, there are drivers offering seats in their cars to people who want to join them while they drive around hunting for pokemon.... Dangerous on so many levels. Could be perverts/kidnappers luring young kids into their cars and driving while playing is dangerous also.
Edited by Nzy, 06 August 2016 - 07:49 PM.
Who's fault?
jay walker pedestrian already in the lane, lady driver slow to react?
�
maybe i cockeyed but the "lady driver" came out from the rear door while the "male passenger" came out a few secs later from the driver's door�
Toddler dashes out onto the road to chase after a bird, & was returned back to his/her parents later back in the coffeeshop.
Thankful to the adult leaning on the gate for catching hold of toddler although he is limping with a hurt leg.��
SG have so many irresponsible parents�
maybe i cockeyed but the "lady driver" came out from the rear door while the "male passenger" came out a few secs later from the driver's door�
Haha, first to exit the car may not necessarily be the driver!
bloody jaywalker, walk also dont bother to check the lane
the car probably see her only last minute.
�
that being said, the car was not speeding, else the jaywalker would have flown a distance away
�
IMHO, �I am not sure if the victim really don't bother to check.�
�
18:47:17 �Victim stepped on double yellow lines and started to cross.�Total 7 steps.First 3 steps (almost 2 secs), victim seems to be looking in the direction behind the back of the car with camera.��18:47:20�Victim on the second lane. �Total 5 steps to cross.First 3 steps, victim look straight ahead.On the 4th step, victim seems to tilt head a bit to the right and taking a glance.�18:47:23Victim on 3rd lane.Victim took 1 step, then started to run with small steps and seems to brace for impact before being hit.�
Edited by Kklee, 06 August 2016 - 08:24 PM.
�
IMHO, �I am not sure if the victim really don't bother to check.�
�
18:47:17 �Victim stepped on double yellow lines and started to cross.�Total 7 steps.First 3 steps (almost 2 secs), victim seems to be looking in the direction behind the back of the car with camera.��18:47:20�Victim on the second lane. �Total 5 steps to cross.First 3 steps, victim look straight ahead.On the 4th step, victim seems to tilt head a bit to the right and taking a glance.�18:47:23Victim on 3rd lane.Victim took 1 step, then started to run with small steps and seems to brace for impact before being hit.��
�
you are right. she checked and decided to touch the car, hence speeding up to guarantee the contact�
Edited by Othello, 06 August 2016 - 09:10 PM.
Toddler dashes out onto the road to chase after a bird, & was returned back to his/her parents later back in the coffeeshop.
Thankful to the adult leaning on the gate for catching hold of toddler although he is limping with a hurt leg.
SG have so many irresponsible parents
Where are the f-ing parents??!!
Where are the f-ing parents??!!
�
having a f-ing session??
having a f-ing session??
Where are the f-ing parents??!!
f**ked Up Beyond All Recognition.
Where are the f-ing parents??!!
Parents playing POKEMON.
�
Children playing BIRDKEMON
yes, from my experience with different cameras. Video footage always look�
�
1. further
2. faster�
�
So those trying to judge the woman being knocked down should take into account that the woman is nearer to the car than what the video showed and hence�no way could the car avoid knocking her.
min-star as in minister? shanmugam?
Guessing that it could possibly be a chase?
Want to clear carbon, better to head North.
�
to me it seems like the cyclist realized that he is at fault as he quickly walked off with his bike.
�
our roads are really getting dangerous for drivers as there are a lot more reckless road-users around, maybe this thread should be renamed Singapore Reckless Drivers Videos instead
�
Us drivers really have to practice defensive driving at all times, anticipate what other road users are doing or going to do and be fully focused on the road. �Damn stressed sometimes
Well done LTA!
�Happened at Bedok North Road and Bedok North Ave 3 junction. Cyclist ride across the junction when red man is on
�
�
�
Wasted. Natural selection was only 1 second away.
Boh mata = Boh Cheng Fu
What's happening now is TP fault.
Boh mata = Boh Cheng Fu
They can spend so much on sophisticated speed cams to catch speeding but cannot catch these illegal cyclist... Come to think of it Drivers pay road tax and Coe where else ahem.....
They can spend so much on sophisticated speed cams to catch speeding but cannot catch these illegal cyclist... Come to think of it Drivers pay road tax and Coe where else ahem.....
�
Sorry hor.
�
It is not juz the cyclist. �The entire road is in a mess because there is no TP petrol.
Already seen drivers playing while driving. The phone in their phone holder so according to what TP just clarified, it is legal. I saw one guy who just on hazard light and pulled over just to catch a pokemon....
Infact, in the pokemon go facebook group, there are drivers offering seats in their cars to people who want to join them while they drive around hunting for pokemon.... Dangerous on so many levels. Could be perverts/kidnappers luring young kids into their cars and driving while playing is dangerous also.
Wasted! Not Buang by King Kong lorry!Happened at Bedok North Road and Bedok North Ave 3 junction. Cyclist ride across the junction when red man is on
They can spend so much on sophisticated speed cams to catch speeding but cannot catch these illegal cyclist... Come to think of it Drivers pay road tax and Coe where else ahem.....
Illegal E-Bikes under LTA not TP...
This cyclist court own death die also no one pity.. but I pity the vezel though.. have right of way but get hit for nothing.
1/2 a second from going to hell ....
If the cyclist doesn't want to wake up after this incident, guarantee he won't be so lucky the next time !
Pissed off with this kind of cyclist that made the road so dangerous ....
For those who have car cameras, can confirm what I notice from my camera?� From the video, object may seem further away than it actually is viewed with own eyes?
Yes, most car cam uses wide angle lens. Things look further than actually is.�
So those trying to judge the woman being knocked down should take into account that the woman is nearer to the car than what the video showed and hence�no way could the car avoid knocking her.
Have seen many commented on various video that cam car driver reaction slow. But in actual fact the distance are really closer.
Illegal E-Bikes under LTA not TP...
Oh yes, �there is indeed an e-bike gang, look like a motorcycle but it is e-bike lor.
�
They are like Kings of the road.
�
�
�
Just saw a convoy of 7 illegal e-bikes plying eunos area.
Well done LTA!�
Sorry hor.
It is not juz the cyclist. The entire road is in a mess because there is no TP petrol.The Vezel at least suffered some dents and paintwork damaged. Repair cost expensive in SG hor.
Shiok ... can speed beside LTA bike next time ...Who said out TP bo chor kang�
�
the last part of this video is best, TP at 160km/hr�
Who said out TP bo chor kang
the last part of this video is best, TP at 160km/hr
Actually this kind of issue the police won't do anything with it.
I find that it's best to settle it with the party involved directly is the best.
It's like quarrel or fights in office, friends, etc.. don't need to get police to help. They can't be really bothered to help settle it anyway.
The usual practise is just take down particulars, file a report. That's it.
And what do you want for compensation if you do go to the police ?�
DO you think they will issue a warrant or summon ? No either.
But if you can't feel good not going to police and not daring to confront the driver, then you just stay home and feel angry about it and then.. that's about it. You gave up your chance to vet it out against this reckless driver yourself.
�
Saying - if you can't help yourself, nobody can help you.
�
no lah, i think those hot headed days are behind me. �If nothing really serious happen, I will just let it past, probably curse the other driver that's all. �
�
But really, for me in greater scheme of things, I find no point continue to think about once it is over.
This has to be the most outrageous taxi driver I've ever confronted !
My several confrontation with taxi drivers were usually typically the Guai Lan taxi uncles?or play Ya Ya Papaya !
But this Comfort Taxi Driver SHA3193G has to be the most ridicluous and spoken of utter nonsense to me.
�
Voices recorded were a little muted due to my car camera mic unable to pick up clear voices with the commotion happening behind my car , but I had edited the video to amplify the volume.
Take it with a pinch of salt if you do not believe the words from me and especially from the driver ( which was too soft to be recorded, as he spoke inside his own taxi )
�
I got out to confront him for his reckless act of cutting through my left turning lane and I opened his door.
He reacted in a slight shock though, but I didn't had physical contact with the driver.
I opened the door so that just in case he reversed his car to get away, I can yank the door off ? Or can't I ? LOL�
�
I questioned him on why the F&*k did he dash through his right turn to almost collide to my front of my car ( pardon the claim but it was quite a close proximity, despite the camera wide angle )
He replied and said " won't lah " in mandarin, assuming what he meant was that his act probably won't harm me or any people around.
�
So I questioned him did you know that I am already making the turn to the lane, and that he is suppose to look out and not cut into me from his " right turning " act?
�
He said " don't know ".
WTF ??
�
Since he everything don't know, everything ??? ???? �i just give him something he sure know lor... pardon my vulgarities in the end of the video, but that was necessary so that I can be remembered by him today.�
�
�
�
live and let live..�
�
u did not need to chase him to proof a point.
�
I had people who reverse and nearly bang into me while I was walking and I was holding my child hand as she was a height of slightly taller then the bumper.
�
The driver being a BMW 5 series driver had the cheek to tell me..�
when I ask him. Do u know that you nearly knock down my kid and me when you speed up to park your car
�
his reply was I dont know
�
I ask why would you not know when you have parking sensor ?
�
Do you know how to drive
�
I dont know leh.. you want to teach me ?
�
..
�
It takes all sort of people to get their just desert one day .. so relax...
20 min journey become 2 hours
no lah, i think those hot headed days are behind me. �If nothing really serious happen, I will just let it past, probably curse the other driver that's all. �
�
But really, for me in greater scheme of things, I find no point continue to think about once it is over.
�
In short, you have learn and grown to be more matured.
�
Stay cumm...and carry on.
Can't stand taxi chei in front of you, don't drive.
The reaction is more worrying for me.
Seriously......�
When I 1st got my driving license, i often got tips and advise about bad cabbie encounters.
Yet, my experience tells me otherwise.
�
Perhaps I had been lucky , or perhaps I had been a little more observant. Here is what I found:
a) Majority of cabbies DO try to signal their intend, Even� during erupt lane switching or sudden stops.
b) Most of these occur when they have client on board or trying to fetch a potential client.
c) Some of them are driven by folks in their senior years.
�
I am NOT saying cabbies are saints and giving them excuses.
�
I am just saying I tried to put myself in their shoes.
Seriously, like that also need to step out of car to confront, I might have to do it multiple times a day on a bad day especially raining day.....
"This has to be the most outrageous taxi driver I've ever confronted !
My several confrontation with taxi drivers were usually typically the Guai Lan taxi uncles?or play Ya Ya Papaya !"
My goodness.. He says I have ever confronted.. Been doing that all these while
Edited by Chucky2007, 10 August 2016 - 12:05 PM.
When I 1st got my driving license, i often got tips and advise about bad cabbie encounters.
Yet, my experience tells me otherwise.
Perhaps I had been lucky , or perhaps I had been a little more observant. Here is what I found:
a) Majority of cabbies DO try to signal their intend, Even during erupt lane switching or sudden stops.
b) Most of these occur when they have client on board or trying to fetch a potential client.
c) Some of them are driven by folks in their senior years.
I am NOT saying cabbies are saints and giving them excuses.
I am just saying I tried to put myself in their shoes.
![[bounce1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vCUNCxHq8Ma6DEfCb0s4JbVOTHk-esNodQHk6GtiJjLlpXCl0HoT13AlLRSWzVL21I62LAkmi9NreHtWAowuenFswRIdfp_9ugXZL4_slvUPPw2CFoXRYynGUBcRBh-3QzciB0F7V6=s0-d)
![[:/]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_v2R2fPesyn0NjbEAh_LC3nNKKRqD1yG1X-c3FtYxD9RM3zyt_AmMeigf-DgrPXy60l3XkFmYhHlN_OMIAcazy_0_vayh8LJ6GNQGSdFvqSeI_MFBxNT0AinTEk3gFYl1BRDk34QR8=s0-d)
![[shocked]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tvVN_PYyY-AvlB9OIlP0lnAoE8gtcbap5cO6Hton6ZmbEWmrPUWWumN_XDI0Akw835Rg0_R_lVB7fw6M86PdPsTy1VhRRS3rRA4bik8zNrTR4glZXErhOdgdNGpu6Rm8S0fAuscxY=s0-d)
![[rolleyes]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sRzG2FWfWKcQZ9AgfQRRWZzPWI0swr_W6pIV1QTqXFEGOIUaEpZ0BQDt8TKsXP_Q3fPHibZN3aRZfrGfDAaBlbJnhJRD4mfCUTKp3YGip70KcbyzqLcvsO2RGfu7g1k5bTByzN4LTozA=s0-d)
![[smallcry]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_t14Uklp2Zb2ztKrQDw8DMJpM1WurTMQaIXyB5hH5Da9ydaMpvaUnWj1W-y9VbkPmefgpuIBXCrX2dJGZBaAQ8CFZ1M5QOLdZafhqR84WMH3KXWQp6z73YXU5Gtat50ejUoAG-BjoD16A=s0-d)
![[mad]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_v2Y_08dU1RI2IbX0eum_ZNWteeTsZKlOzjp_CmybP5u05PvZ1o_a3ARYJ-YkkjCo5H0BUcb2x0viUrNSz-Cz2xiOyZ7Zgo8os8D2E-yx1i6re5F7cDaqihiugrknPOArUHkOM=s0-d)
![[rifle]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uKmMP2vjPNWNfDLfvLo1WK9GoDPSzXHA9a90JqfIj_tBqFnDflJN2UCZWBZMiHTckQHCHVmvSg-u5N95gUOty7vMmArpdnVG8MbJ10vl6JV3x-4JhAJ9Nx8F32iazzNcd6ffus=s0-d)
![[nod]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tTy0Wn-JUF2ZfObilJFoHXlMdv4DEwlO5tMX3IdmN1DTxVKa3RT1TbP69x_UmD12p5OpJW4UmHgAlzqedQck9iQQf5JGExWzJx2HJbgbs3DGrqKuSvposB0KwvlUBkU0sKag=s0-d)
![[dead]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sTwNfFQcEhWFZVh1orxck39I-PgFq0M_vCJ3voeZ2j_4Xe3kcVbITRURkqghpcNoTbsFQu9703RKIQJlTuN_1OO5Xnio_QxgTdPemS9d0dHxsLyqy_yLEKajp1tKAGbXOVbhIu=s0-d)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét